EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 343 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 343 (2025) 02003 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 19
Section Aerospace Engineering & Aerodynamics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534302003
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. A. Garni, A.Z. Saeed, A. Garni, Experimental and numerical investigation of 65-degree delta and 65/40 degree double-delta wings. J. Aircr. 45, 71–76 (2008). https://doi.org/10.251471.20243 [Google Scholar]
  2. D.C. Viola, D. Basawaraj, Numerical Simulation of 650 Delta Wing and 650/400 Double Delta Wing to Study the Behaviour of Primary Vortices on Aerodynamic Characteristics. Int. J. Eng. Res. 4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV4IS060764 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Kegelman, F. Roos, Effects of leading-edge shape and vortex burst on the flowfield of a 70-degree-sweep delta-wing, in Proceedings of the 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia (1989). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1989-86 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Luckring, Reynolds number and leading-edge bluntness effects on a 65-deg delta wing, in Proceedings of the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina (2002). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-419 [Google Scholar]
  5. J.M. Luckring, Experimental Investigation Of The Flow About A 65 Delta Wing In The Nasa Langley National Transonic Facility. (Citeseer) [Google Scholar]
  6. J.F. Marchman, Aerodynamics of Inverted Leading-Edge Flaps on Delta Wing. J. Aircr. 18, 1051–1056 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57599 [Google Scholar]
  7. J.J. Miau, K.T. Kuo, W.H. Liu, S.J. Hsieh, S.J. Chou, C.K. Lin, Flow developments above 50-deg sweep delta wings with different leading-edge profiles. J. Aircr. 32, 787–794 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46792 [Google Scholar]
  8. M.A. Mohamed, I. Afgan, M.H. Salim, I.K. Mohamed, Low speed aerodynamic characteristics of non-slender delta wing at low angles of attack. Alex. Eng. J. 61, 9427–9435 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. R.E. Muir, A. Galeana, I.M. Viola, The leading-edge vortex of swift wing-shaped delta wings. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170077 [Google Scholar]
  10. A.A. Pashilkar, Surface pressure model for simple delta wings at high angles of attack. Sadhana 26, 495–515 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Ramakrishna, C.S. Kumar, B. Venkatesh, Influence of leading edge shapes on vortex behaviour of delta wing. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1276/1/012008 [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Verhaagen, Effects of Leading-Edge Radius on Aerodynamic Characteristics of 50o Delta Wings, in Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-323 [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Ashley, T. Vaneck, M.A.M. Jarrah, J. Katz, Unsteady aerodynamic loading of delta wings for low and high angles of attack, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nonsteady Fluid Dynamics (1990) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Atta, D. Rockwell, Leading-edge vortices due to low Reynolds number flow past a pitching delta wing. AIAA J. 28, 995–1004 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.25156 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Bell, A. Burner, Data fusion in wind tunnel testing - Combined pressure paint and model deformation measurement, in Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia (1988). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-2500 [Google Scholar]
  16. C.E. Brown, W.H. Michael, Effect of Leading-Edge Separation on the Lift of a Delta Wing. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 21, 690–694 (1954). https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3180 [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Çelik, M.M. Yavuz, Effect of Edge Modifications on Flow Structure of Low Swept Delta Wing. AIAA J. 54, 1789–1797 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2514/LJ054587 [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Chen, C. Pan, J. Wang, Effects of the sinusoidal leading edge on delta wing performance and mechanism. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56, 772–779 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5143-3 [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Chiba, S. Obayashi, K. Nakahashi, CFD Visualization of Second Primary Vortex Structure on a 65-Degree Delta Wing, in Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina (2024). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-1231 [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Chivey, Navier-Stokes calculation of transonic flow past the NTF 65 deg delta wing. (Old Dominion Univ., NASA/American Society for Engineering Ed., 1991) [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Chu, J.L. Luckring, Experimental Surface Pressure Data Obtained on 65 "delta Wing Across Reynolds Number and Mach Number Ranges. (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1, 1966) [Google Scholar]
  22. E.C. Polhamus, Predictions of vortex lift characteristics by a leading edge suction analogy. J. Aircr. 8, 193–9 (1971) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.