EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 343 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 343 (2025) 02004 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 18
Section Aerospace Engineering & Aerodynamics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534302004
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. E. Baltz, P. Gondolo, Searching for extragalactic planets. (arXiv: Astrophysics, 1999). https://web3.arxiv.org/list/astro-ph/1999-09?skip=500&show=25 [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Baltz, SEARCHING FOR EXTRAGALACTIC PLANETS. (1999). https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9909510 [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Jagtap, U. Inamdar, S. Dere, M. Fatima, N. Shardoor, Habitability of Exoplanets using Deep Learning, in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS52119.2021.9422571 [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Hora, Classifying Exoplanets as Potentially Habitable Using Machine Learning. 203, 212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6602-3 20 [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Luz, R. Braga, E. Ribeiro, Assessment of Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Exoplanet Identification. Electronics 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13193950 [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Deng, X. Zhu, D. Cheng, M. Zong, S. Zhang, Efficient KNN classification algorithm for big data. Neurocomputing 195, 143–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.112 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Baxi, Machine Learning Approach to Classify Transit Signals and Assessing the Exoplanets' Probability for Habitability. (2018). https://norma.ncirl.ie/3436/1/shreyasshrirambaxi.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Saha, S. Basak, M. Safonova, K. Bora, S. Agrawal, P. Sarkar, J. Murthy, Theoretical validation of potential habitability via analytical and boosted tree methods: An optimistic study on recently discovered exoplanets. Astron. Comput. 23, 141–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASCOM.2018.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Konstantinov, L. Utkin, Interpretable Machine Learning with an Ensemble of Gradient Boosting Machines. ArXiv, abs/2010.07388. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/IKNOSYS.2021.106993 [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Bentéjac, A. Csörgo, G. Martinez-Munoz, A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54, 1937–1967 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09896-5 [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Lu, R. Mazumder, Randomized Gradient Boosting Machine. SIAM J. Optim. 30, 2780–2808 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1137/18m1223277 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Basak, S. Agrawal, S. Saha, A. Theophilus, K. Bora, G. Deshpande, J. Murthy, Habitability classification of exoplanets: a machine learning insight. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 2221–2251 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00203-z [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Pratyush, A. Gangrade, Automation Of Transiting Exoplanet Detection, Identification, and Habitability Assessment Using Machine Learning Approaches. ArXiv, abs/2112.03298 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Jin, L. Yang, C. Chiang, Exoplanets Identification and Clustering with Machine Learning Methods. Mach. Learn. Appl. Int. J. 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5121/mlaij.2022.9101 [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Raminaidu, V. Priyadarshini, C. Swaroop, S. Reddy, Building Accurate Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Habitability of Exo-Planets, in Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) (2023) pp. 961–967. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT55814.2023.10061122 [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Cuéllar, P. Granados, E. Fabregas, M. Curé, H. Vargas, S. Dormido-Canto, et al., Deep learning exoplanets detection by combining real and synthetic data. PLoS One 17, e0268199 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268199 [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Rezvani, X. Wang, in Applied Soft Computing (2023) [Google Scholar]
  18. M.S. Jakka, Data-Driven approaches to estimating habitability of exoplanets. (arXiv.org, 2023). https://arxiv.org/html/2305.11204 [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Paul, D. Mukherjee, P. Das, A. Gangopadhyay, A. Chintha, S. Kundu, Improved Random Forest for Classification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27, 4012–4024 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2018.2834830 [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Sharma, Understanding and Applying F1 Score: AI Evaluation Essentials with Hands on Coding. (ArizeAI, June 6 2023). https://arize.com/blog-course/f1-score/#:~:text=F1%20score%20is%20a%20measure,better%20understanding%20of%20model%20performance. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Sarkar, J. Zhou, A. Scaboo, J. Zhou, N. Aloysius, T. Lim, Assessment of soybean lodging using UAV imagery and machine learning. Plants 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162893 [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Sarkar, K. Bhatia, S. Saha, M. Safonova, S. Sarkar, Postulating Exoplanetary Habitability via a Novel Anomaly Detection Method. ArXiv, abs/2109.02273 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3556 [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Liaw, M. Wiener, Classification and Regression by randomForest. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Chaudhary, S. Kolhe, R. Kamal, An improved random forest classifier for multi-class classification. Inf. Process. Agric. 3, 215–222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INPA.2016.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Bugueno, F. Mena, M. Araya, Refining Exoplanet Detection Using Supervised Learning and Feature Engineering, in Proceedings of the 2018 XLIV Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI) (2018) pp. 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2018.00041 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.