EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 343 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 343 (2025) 02007 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 11
Section Aerospace Engineering & Aerodynamics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534302007
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. Moreau, E., Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 40(3), 605–636 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Thomas, F. O., Corke, T. C., & Patel, M., Plas,ma actuators for separation control on stationary and oscillating airfoils. AIAA Journal, 47(12), 2820–2831 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  3. Enloe, C. L., McLaughlin, T. E., Van Dyken, R. D., et al., Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actuator: Plasma morphology. AIAA Journal, 42(3), 595–604 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  4. Corke, T. C., Enloe, C. L., & Wilkinson, S. P. Dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 42, 505–529 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. Debien, A., Auffray, J., & Deleuze, A., Sliding discharge for plasma flow control: Electrical properties. Journal of Electrostatics, 70(2), 171–181 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. Little, J., Nishihara, M., Adamovich, I., & Samimy, M., High-lift airfoil leading edge separation control using nanosecond pulse-driven DBD plasma actuators. Experiments in Fluids, 48(4), 521–537 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. Pons, J., & Moreau, E., Corona discharge actuators for airflow control. Journal of Electrostatics, 66(7-8), 440–145 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimmel, S., & Ricker, R. Glow discharge plasma actuators for flow acceleration. Plasma Science and Technology, 13 (2), 238–243 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  9. Patel, M., Corke, T. C., & Gordeyev, S. Plasma flow control with peristaltic-like plasma actuators. AIAA Paper, 2007–1037 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. Zong, H., & Kotsonis, M., Vectorized plasma actuators: A new approach for directional flow control. AIAA Journal, 53(10), 2858–2869 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi, K. S., Jukes, T. N., Whalley, R. D., Feng, L., Wang, J., Matsunuma, T., & Segawa, T., Plasma virtual actuators for flow control. Journal of Flow Control, Measurement & Visualization, 5(01), 22 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. Thomas, F., & Huang, J., Documentation and Control of Flow Separation on a Low Pressure Turbine Linear Cascade of Pak-B Blades Using Plasma Actuators (No. NASA/CR-2007-214677) (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. Grundmann, S., & Tropea, C., Experimental transition delay using glow-discharge plasma actuators. Experiments in fluids, 42, 653–657 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Poggie, J., McLaughlin, T., & Leonov, S., Plasma aerodynamics: current status and future directions. Aerospace Lab, (10) (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. W. Strunk Jr., E.B. White, The Elements of Style, third ed., Macmillan, New York, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  16. Asada, K., Ninomiya, Y., Fujii, K., & Oyama, A. (2009, January). Airfoil flow experiment on the duty cycle of DBD plasma actuator. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (p. 531). [Google Scholar]
  17. Benard, N., & Moreau, E., Electrical and mechanical characteristics of surface AC dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators applied to airflow control. Experiments in Fluids, 55, 1–43 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. Neretti, G., Active flow control by using plasma actuators. Recent Progress in Some Aircraft Technologies, 1, 13 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  19. Cristofolini, A., Borghi, C. A., & Neretti, G., Charge distribution on the surface of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator for fluid-dynamic control. Journal of Applied Physics, 113(14) (2013). [Google Scholar]
  20. Borghi, C. A., Cristofolini, A., Grandi, G., Neretti, G., & Seri, P., A plasma aerodynamic actuator supplied by a multilevel generator operating with different voltage waveforms. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 24(4), 045018 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. Borghi, C. A., Carraro, M. R., Cristofolini, A., & Neretti, G., Electrohydrodynamic interaction induced by a dielectric barrier discharge. Journal of Applied Physics, 103(6) (2008). [Google Scholar]
  22. Cristofolini, A., Neretti, G., Roveda, F., & Borghi, C. A., Schlieren imaging in a dielectric barrier discharge actuator for airflow control. Journal of Applied Physics, 111(3) (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Cristofolini, A., Neretti, G., & Borghi, C. A., Effect of the charge surface distribution on the flow field induced by a dielectric barrier discharge actuator. Journal of Applied Physics, 114(7) (2013). [Google Scholar]
  24. Neretti, G., Cristofolini, A., Borghi, C. A., Gurioli, A., & Pertile, R., Experimental results in DBD plasma actuators for airflow control. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 40(6), 1678–1687 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  25. F.O. Thomas, T.C. Corke, M. Iqbal, A. Kozlov, and D. Schatzman. Optimization of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Active Aerodynamic Flow Control. AIAA Journal. 2009;47:2169–2178. DOI: 10.2514/1.41588 [Google Scholar]
  26. Corke, T. C., Enloe, C. L., & Wilkinson, S. P., Dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for flow control. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 42(1), 505–529 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  27. Font, G. I., Enloe, C. L., & McLaughlin, T. E. Plasma volumetric effects on the force production of a plasma actuator. AIAA journal, 48(9), 1869–1874 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  28. West, T., & Hosder, S., Numerical investigation of plasma actuator configurations for flow separation control at multiple angles of attack. In 6th AIAA flow control conference (p. 3053) (2012). [Google Scholar]
  29. Neretti, G., Cristofolini, A., & Borghi, C. A., Experimental investigation on a vectorized aerodynamic dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator array. Journal of Applied Physics, 115(16) (2014). [Google Scholar]
  30. Choi, K. S., Jukes, T. N., Whalley, R. D., Feng, L., Wang, J., Matsunuma, T., & Segawa, T., Plasma virtual actuators for flow control. Journal of Flow Control, Measurement & Visualization, 3(01), 22 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  31. Ntantis EL, Xezonakis V. Aerodynamic design optimization of a NACA 0012 airfoil: An introductory adjoint discrete tool for educational purposes. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. 53(3):611–630 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  32. Airfoil Tools (2024, November 3). Clark Y Airfoil (clarky-il). http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=clarkv-il#volar [Google Scholar]
  33. Ntantis, E.L., Francis, E., Pugazendi, V., George, J., Tarek, A., Emthias, M., & Rasheed, S., Study of sinusoidal perturbations on the leading edge of an aircraft wing. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics, and Aviation, 53(3), 375–386 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  34. Ntantis, E.L., & Xezonakis, V., Improving transonic performance with adjoint-based NACA 0012 airfoil design optimization. Results in Engineering, 24, 103189 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  35. Ntantis, E.L., Francis, E., Fazel, H., George, J., Blal, M., Emthias, M., & Pugazendi, V., Numerical study on a supersonic flow around a bullet. WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics, 18, 1–9. 12 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  36. David, L.C.F., Pazo, J., Ntantis, E.L., Siddharth, K.S. Cross-Correlation of Schlieren Images to Retrieve Velocity Information. In: Sharma, R., Kannojiya, R., Garg, N., Gautam, S.S. (eds) Advances in Engineering Design. FLAME 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore (2023). [Google Scholar]
  37. Patel, M. P., Ng, T. T., Vasudevan, S., Corke, T. C., & He, C., Plasma actuators for hingeless aerodynamic control of an unmanned air vehicle. Journal of Aircraft, 44(4), 1264–1274 (2027). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.