Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Civil Engineering & Infrastructure Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534303002
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. T. Waight, M.B.W. Fyhn, T.B. Thomsen, T. Van Tri, L.H. Nielsen, I. Abatzis, D. Frei, Permian to Cretaceous granites and felsic volcanics from SW Vietnam and S Cambodia: Implications for tectonic development of Indochina, J. Asian Earth Sci. 219, 104902 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104902 [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Telbisz, Lidar-based morphometry of conical hills in temperate karst areas in Slovenia, Remote Sens. 13, 2668 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142668 [Google Scholar]
  3. I.B.O. Agastya, P.D. Diwyastra, K. Ariantana, Y. Satya, P.M. Utama, Potential geotourism attractions on Nusa Penida Island, Klungkung Regency, Bali, Int. J. Geotourism Sci. Dev. 2, 1–14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.58856/ijgsd.v2i2.18 [Google Scholar]
  4. R.P. Setiadi, A. Damayanti, M. Dimyati, Utilization of the Maros karst landscape based on the morphology (case study in Bantimurung Subdistrict, Maros District, Sulawesi Selatan), IOP Conf. Ser. Earth. Environ. Sci. 683, 012003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012003 [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Waltham, Fengcong, Fenglin, cone karst and tower karst, Cave Karst Sci. 35, 77–88 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Mihevc, R. Mihevc, Morphological characteristics and distribution of dolines in Slovenia: A study of a lidar-based doline map of Slovenia, Acta Carsologica. 50, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v50i1.9462 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Dong, J. Ma, Y. Mo, H. Yang, GIS-based watershed unit forest landscape visual quality assessment in Yangshuo Section of Lijiang River Basin, China, Sustainability. 14, 14895 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214895 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Veress, Karst types and their karstification, J. Earth Sci. 31, 621–634 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1306-x [Google Scholar]
  9. Geological Exploration Report on Kampot limestone deposit, Unpublished report (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Bhatawdekar, E.T. Mohamad, T.N. Singh, D.J. Armaghani, Rockmass classification to artificial intelligent techniques for solving environmental issues due to blasting in tropically weathered rocks, in: 9th Int. Congr. Environ. Geotech. 357–367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.53243/ICEG2023-251 [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Lundborg, A. Persson, A. Ladegaard-Pedersen, R. Holmberg, Keeping the lid on flyrock in open-pit blasting, Eng. Min. J. 176, 95–100 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  12. R.M. Bhatawdekar, E.T. Mohamad, T.N. Singh, P. Pathak, D.J. Armaghani, Rock mass classification for the assessment of blastability in tropically weathered limestones, in: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Inn. Sustain. and Responsible Mining: ISRM 2020. 13–44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60839-2 2 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Bastami, A.A. Bazzazi, H.H. Shoormasti, K. Ahangari, Prediction of blasting cost in limestone mines using gene expression programming model and artificial neural networks, J. Min. Environ. 11, 281–300 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2019.9027.1790 [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Fattahi, H. Ghaedi, D.J. Armaghani, Enhancing blasting efficiency: A smart predictive model for cost optimization and risk reduction, Resour. Policy, 97, 105261 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105261 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.