Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 03009
Number of page(s) 13
Section Civil Engineering & Infrastructure Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534303009
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. B. Khoshnevis, Automated construction by contour crafting related robotics and information technologies, Autom. Constr. 13, 5–19 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R.A. Buswell, W.R. Leal de Silva, S.Z. Jones, J. Dirrenberger, 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research, Cem. Concr. Res. 112, 37–19 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.T. Junaid, A. Shweiki, S. Barakat, M. Alhalabi, O. Mostafa, Flexural characterization and ductility assessment of small-scale mortar beams reinforced with 3D-printed polymers, Struct. 45, 1751–1761 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  4. M.T. Junaid, M. Alhalabi, O. Mostafa, S. Barakat, Flexural characterization of concrete beams reinforced with 3D-printed formworks, Mater. Sci. Forum 1108, 181–189 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4028/p-D9r7Sj [Google Scholar]
  5. P.F.G. Banfill, Rheology of fresh cement and concrete, Rheol. Rev. 1994, 61–130 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  6. A.I. Laskar, S. Talukdar, Rheology of fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete, AEI> 2008 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Panda, M.J. Tan, Rheological behavior of high volume fly ash mixtures containing micro silica for digital construction application, Constr. Build. Mater. 162, 286–294 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Xu, Y. Zheng, K. Wu, P. Feng, Y. Yao, Rheology, printability and buildability of 3D printed fly ash cementitious materials: Effect of fly ash and slump-retaining admixture, Cem. Concr. Compos. 126, 104352 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  9. C.F. Ferraris, F.D. Larrard, N. Martys, Fresh concrete rheology: Recent developments, in Materials Science of Concrete VI, 215–241 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Pan, M.J. Tan, Printability region of building scale extruded concrete, Autom. Constr. 95, 263–272 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. R.S. Ahari, T.K. Erdem, I. Koc, An experimental and numerical study on the effect of silica fume on fresh properties of self-compacting concrete, Comput. Concr. 15, 399–420 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Jiao, Z. Shui, Y. Huang, W. Chen, Effects of superfine cement on the fluidity and compressive strength of cement-silica fume paste, Mater. Struct. 50, 11 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. M.A. Moeini, M.J. Tan, A. Perrot, FDM-based discrete element modelling of 3D concrete printing: From flow to filament bonding, Addit. Manuf. 36, 101452 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Roussel, Rheological requirements for printable concretes, Cem. Concr. Res. 112, 76–85 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Reiter, T. Wangler, N. Roussel, R.J. Flatt, Setting on demand for concrete extrusion, Cem. Concr. Res. 112, 86–95 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. A.V. Rahul, M. Santhanam, H. Meena, Z. Ghani, 3D printable concrete: Mixture design and test methods, Cem. Concr. Compos. 97, 13–23 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Jalal, M. Fathi, M. Sharifipour, Effects of fly ash and slag on the mechanical properties, porosity and durability of concrete, Int. J. Civ. Eng. 13, 23–31 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Sahin, K.R. Akça, H. Yalçiner, Influence of silica fume on the rheological properties and buildability of 3D printable concrete, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. (in press) (2024) [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Guo, C. Shi, Z. Wang, J. Xiao, On the rheology of 3D printable cementitious materials: Effect of curing and structural build-up, Constr. Build. Mater. 241, 118044 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Khoshnevis, Automated construction by contour crafting related robotics and information technologies, Autom. Constr. 13, 5–19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00039-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. R.A. Buswell, W.R. Leal de Silva, S.Z. Jones, J. Dirrenberger, 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research, Cem. Concr. Res. 112, 37–49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Gonzalez-Gomez, I. MacLeod, G.J. Gibbons, A critical review of 3D printing in construction: Benefits, challenges, and risks, J. Mater. Sci. 56, 12967–12984 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Jayathilakage, P. Rajeev, J.G. Sanjayan, Challenges and limitations of 3D construction printing, Cem. Concr. Compos. 120, 104064 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104064 [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Perrot, D. Rangeard, E. Courteille, Review of rheology in cement-based materials and its application to 3D printing, Rheol. J. 51, 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00701-w [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Pan, M.J. Tan, Interlayer bonding investigation of 3D printing cementitious materials with fluidity retaining polycarboxylate superplasticizer and high dispersion polycarboxylate superplasticizer, Constr. Build. Mater. 327, 126963 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126963 [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, G. Liu, Y. Yang, M. Wu, B. Pang, Fresh properties of a novel 3D printing concrete ink, Constr. Build. Mater. 174, 263–271 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.115 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Roussel, C. Stefani, R. Leroy, From mini-cone test to Abrams cone test: Measurement of cement-based materials yield stress using slump tests, Cem. Concr. Res. 40, 1517–1521 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Jayathilakage, P. Rajeev, J.G. Sanjayan, Yield stress criteria to assess the buildability of 3D concrete printing, Cem. Concr. Compos. 120, 104064 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104064 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.