Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
Article Number 03010
Number of page(s) 18
Section Civil Engineering & Infrastructure Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534303010
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. Lindsey, R. (2022). Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Climate.gov; NOAA. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide [Google Scholar]
  2. Alasinrin Babatunde, K., Faizah Said, F., Ghani, N., Nor, M., Rawshan, A., & Begum. (2019). Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Malaysian Power Sector: Current Issues and Future Directions (Mengurangkan Pengeluaran Karbon Dioksida dalam Sektor Tenaga di Malaysia: Isu Semasa dan Arah Masa Hadapan). Jurnal Kejuruteraan SI, 1(6), 59–69. https://www.ukm.my/jkukm/wp-content/uploads/2018/si1/6/8.pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. Soong, Y., Howard, B. H., Hedges, S. W., Haljasmaa, I., Warzinski, R. P., Irdi, G., & McLendon, T. R. (2014). CO2 Sequestration in Saline Formation. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14(2), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.06.0195 [Google Scholar]
  4. IPCC. (2005). Bert, M., Ogunlade, D., Heleen C., Manuela, L, & Leo, M. (Eds.), Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 431–431). Cambridge University Press, UK. [Google Scholar]
  5. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25259. [Google Scholar]
  6. Celia, M. A., Bachu, S., Nordbotten, J. M., & Bandilla, K. W. (2015). Status of CO2storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resources Research, 51(9), 6846–6892. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017609 [Google Scholar]
  7. Salvi, B. L., & Jindal, S. (2019). Recent developments and challenges ahead in carbon capture and sequestration technologies. SN Applied Sciences, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0909-2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson, E. J., Johnson, T. L., & Keith, D. W. (2003). Regulating the Ultimate Sink: Managing the Risks of Geologic CO2Storage. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(16), 3476–3483. https://doi.org/10.1021/es021038+ [Google Scholar]
  9. Ajayi, T., Gomes, J. S., & Bera, A. (2019). A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Petroleum Science, 16(5), 1028–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Szulczewski, M., & Juanes, R. (2009). A simple but rigorous model for calculating CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers at the basin scale. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 3307–3314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.117 [Google Scholar]
  11. Soong, Y., Hedges, S. W., Howard, B. H., Dilmore, R. M., & Allen, D. E. (2013). Effect of contaminants from flue gas on CO2sequestration in saline formation. International Journal of Energy Research, 38(9), 1224–1232. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3140 [Google Scholar]
  12. Michael, K., Golab, A., Shulakova, V., Ennis-King, J., Allinson, G., Sharma, S., & Aiken, T. (2010). Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers—A review of the experience from existing storage operations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(4), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  13. Torp TA, Gale J. (2004). Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: the Sleipner and SACS projects. Energy. 2004;29(9):1361–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(04)00153-7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bachu, S., Gunter, W. D., & Perkins, E. H. (1994). Aquifer disposal of CO2: Hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energy Conversion and Management, 35(4), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(94)90060-4 [Google Scholar]
  15. Oldenburg, C. M. (2012). Geologic Carbon Sequestration geologic/geological carbon sequestration: Sustainability and Environmental Risk. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, 4119–4133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_200 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasbollah, D. Z. A. and Junin, R. (2015). A preliminary basin scale evaluation framework of potential sedimentary basins in Malaysia for carbon dioxide sequestration, Chemical Engineering Transactions 45, pp 1537–1542. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kartikasurja, D. O., Lin, T. G., Sukahar, M. W., & Viratno, B. (2008). Study of Produced CO2 Storage into Aquifer in an Offshore Field, Malaysia. Onepetro.org; OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/114553-MS [Google Scholar]
  18. Das, D. B., Gill, B. S., Abidoye, L. K., & Khudaida, K. J. (2014). A numerical study of dynamic capillary pressure effect for supercritical carbon dioxide-water flow in porous domain. AIChE Journal, 60(12), 4266–4278. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14577 [Google Scholar]
  19. Birkholzer, J., Zhou, Q., & Tsang, C. (2009). Large-scale impact of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: A sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bachu, S., & Adams, J. J. (2003). Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO2 in solution. Energy Conversion and Management, 44(20), 3151–3175. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(03)00101-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Naderi Beni, A., Kühn, M., Meyer, R., & Clauser, C. (2011). Numerical Modeling of a Potential Geological CO 2 Sequestration Site at Minden (Germany). Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 17(4), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9295-x [Google Scholar]
  22. Ranjith, P. G., Perera, M. S. A., & Khan, E. (2012). A study of safe CO2storage capacity in saline aquifers: a numerical study. International Journal of Energy Research, 37(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.2954 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pruess, K., Garcia, J., Kovscek, T., Oldenburg, C., Rutqvist, J., Steefel, C., & Xu, T. (2002). Intercomparison of numerical simulation codes for geologic disposal of CO2. www.osti.gov.https://www.osti.gov/biblio/813566 [Google Scholar]
  24. Junin, R. and Hasbollah, D. Z. A. (2016). CO2 Storage Capacity Assessment of Deep Saline Aquifers in Malaysia [Paper presentation]. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, WASET 2016, London. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, Y., Vuik, C., & Hajibeygi, H. (2022). Analysis of hydrodynamic trapping interactions during full-cycle injection and migration of CO2 in deep saline aquifers. Advances in Water Resources, 159, 104073. https://doi.org/10.10167j.advwatres.2021.104073 [Google Scholar]
  26. Yongqiang, T., Zihao, L., Wang, R., Cui, M., Wang, X., Lun, Z., & Lu, Y. (2019). Experimental Study on the Density-Driven Carbon Dioxide Convective Diffusion in Formation Water at Reservoir Conditions. ACS Omega, 4(6), 11082–11092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00627 [Google Scholar]
  27. Frailey, S. M., & Leetaru, H. (2009). Geological factors affecting CO2 plume distribution. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 3107–3112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.091 [Google Scholar]
  28. Azaroual, M., André, L., Peysson, Y., Pironon, J., Broseta, D., Dedecker, F., Egermann, P., Desroches, J., & Hy-Billiot, J. (2012). Behaviour of the CO2 injection well and the near wellbore during carbon dioxide injection in saline aquifers. Hal-Brgm.archives-Ouvertes.fr. https://hal-brgm.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00755073 [Google Scholar]
  29. Bandilla, K. W., Kraemer, S. R., & Birkholzer, J. T. (2012). Using semi-analytical solutions to approximate the area of potential impact for carbon dioxide injection. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 7. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1210902 [Google Scholar]
  30. Samuel, R. J., & Mahgerefteh, H. (2019). Investigating the impact of flow rate ramp-up on carbon dioxide start-up injection. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 88, 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.04.025. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, Z. F., White, S. K., & White, M. D. (2015). Delineating the horizontal plume extent and CO2 distribution at geologic sequestration sites. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 43, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.018 [Google Scholar]
  32. Teng, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, G., Suekane, T., Wang, D., & Song, Y. (2017). Experimental Evaluation of Injection Pressure and Flow Rate Effects on Geological CO2 Sequestration Using MRI. Energy Procedia, 114, 4986–4993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1642 [Google Scholar]
  33. Azin, R., Mahmoudy, M., Raad, S. M. J., & Osfouri, S. (2013). Measurement and modeling of CO2 diffusion coefficient in Saline Aquifer at reservoir conditions. Open Engineering, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-012-0069-2 [Google Scholar]
  34. Iglauer, S. (2011). Dissolution Trapping of Carbon Dioxide in Reservoir Formation Brine - A Carbon Storage Mechanism, Mass Transfer - Advanced Aspects, Dr. Hironori Nakajima (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-636-2, InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/mass-transfer-advanced-aspects/dissolutiontrapping-of-carbon-dioxide-in-reservoir-formation-brine-a-carbon-storage-mechanism [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu, T., Ajo-Franklin, J., Daley, T. M., & Marone, C. (2019). Dynamics of geologic CO 2 storage and plume motion revealed by seismic coda waves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2464–2469. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810903116 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stanislaw Lasocki, & Orlecka-Sikora, B. (2020). High Injection Rates Counteract Formation of Far-Reaching Fluid Migration Pathways at The Geysers Geothermal Field. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl086212 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mohammadian, E., Hadavimoghaddam, F., Kheirollahi, M., Jafari, M., Chenlu, X., & Liu, B. (2023). Probing Solubility and pH of CO2 in aqueous solutions: Implications for CO2 injection into oceans. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 71, 102463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102463 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.