EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 346 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 346 (2026) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2026
25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas (RFPPC2025)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 8
Section Theory and Modeling of Radio-Frequency Waves in Plasmas
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634601013
Published online 07 January 2026
  1. N. J. Fisch„ Theory of current drive in plasmas, Reviews of Modern Physics 59, 175 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.59.175 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Brambilla, Numerical simulation of ion cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 41, 1 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0741-3335/41/1/002 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. P. Smirnov, and R. W. Harvey, The GENRAY ray tracing code, CompX Report CompX-2000-01 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  4. R. W. Harvey and M. G. McCoy, The CQL3D Fokker–Planck code, IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Simulation and Modeling of Thermonuclear Plasmas, 489–526 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  5. Á. Sánchez-Villar, Z. Bai, N. Bertelli, E. W. Bethel, J. Hillairet, T. Perciano, S. Shiraiwa, G. M. Wallace and J. C. Wright, Machine learning enhanced predictions of ICRF heating: Overcoming numerical limitations via data curation, Physics of Plasmas 32, 062504 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0268341 [Google Scholar]
  6. Á. Sánchez-Villar, Z. Bai, N. Bertelli, E. W. Bethel, J. Hillairet, T. Perciano, S. Shiraiwa, G. M. Wallace and J. C. Wright, Real-time capable modeling of ICRF heating on NSTX and WEST via machine learning approaches, Nuclear Fusion 64, 096039 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad645d [Google Scholar]
  7. G. M. Wallace, Z. Bai, R. Sadre, T. Perciano, N. Bertelli, S. Shiraiwa, E. W. Bethel, and J. C. Wright, Towards fast and accurate predictions of radio frequency power deposition and current profile via data-driven modelling: applications to lower hybrid current drive, Journal of Plasma Physics, 88, 895880401 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0022377822000708 [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Prater, D. Farina, Yu. Gribov, R. W. Harvey, A. K. Ram, Y.-R. Lin-Liu, E. Poli, A. P. Smirnov, F. Volpe, E. Westerhof, et al., Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under ITER conditions, Nuclear Fusion 48, 035006 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/ 48/3/035006 [Google Scholar]
  9. R. L. Iman, Latin hypercube sampling, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. T. H. Stix, Waves in plasmas, Springer Science & Business Media (1992). [Google Scholar]
  11. X. M. Zhai et al., Theoretical analysis of key factors achieving reversed magnetic shear q-profiles sustained with lower hybrid waves on EAST, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 61, 045002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aaffe5 [Google Scholar]
  12. O. Ronneberger et al., U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: MICCAI 2015, Part III, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9351, 234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-24574-4_28 [Google Scholar]
  13. G. D. Kerbel, and M. G. McCoy, Kinetic theory and simulation of multispecies plasmas in tokamaks excited with electromagnetic waves in the ion cyclotron range of frequencies, Physics of Fluids 28, 3629 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.865319 [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Paoletti et al., Lower hybrid current drive accessibility study with reconstructed magnetic equilibria in PBX-M, Nuclear Fusion 34, 771 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/34/6/I01 [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Bonoli, Linear theory of lower hybrid heating, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 12, 95–107 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.1984.4316302 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Brambilla, Waveguide launching of lower hybrid waves, Nuclear Fusion 19, 1343 (1979). https://doi. org/10.1088/0029-5515/19/10/006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Z. Wang et al., Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 600–612 (2004). https://doi. org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.