EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 346 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 346 (2026) 01019 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2026
25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas (RFPPC2025)
Article Number 01019
Number of page(s) 8
Section Theory and Modeling of Radio-Frequency Waves in Plasmas
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634601019
Published online 07 January 2026
  1. P. Lamalle, Dielectric kernels for maxwellian tokamak plasmas, AIP Conference Proceedings 2254, 100001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0014257 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Machielsen, J. Rubin, J. Graves, Exact expression for the hot plasma conductivity kernel in configuration space, Fundamental Plasma Physics 3, 100008 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpp.2023.100008 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Lamalle, Integral dielectric kernels for Maxwellian tokamak plasmas, 20th European Fusion Theory Conference, 2-3 October 2023, Padova, Italy (2023). https://indico.global/event/7904/contributions/69727/contribution.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Ongena, Y.O. Kazakov, B. Schweer, F. Louche, A. Messiaen, M. Vervier, V. Borsuk, R. Bilato, D. Hartmann, K. Hollfeld et al., Physics and applications of ICRH on W7-X, pp. 17–22 (2017). https://scipub.euro-fusion.org/wpcontent/uploads/WPS1CP16_15030_submitted.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Jaeger, L. Berry, E. D’Azevedo, D. Batchelor, M. Carter, K. White, H. Weitzner, Advances in fullwave modeling of radio frequency heated, multi-dimensional plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 9, 1873 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1455001 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Brambilla, Numerical simulation of ion cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 41, 1 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/41/1/002 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Lamalle, On the radiofrequency response of tokamak plasmas, Plasma physics and controlled fusion 39, 1409 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1088/07413335/39/9/011 [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Dumont, Variational approach to radiofrequency waves in magnetic fusion devices, Nuclear Fusion 49, 075033 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/49/7/075033 [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Popovich, W.A. Cooper, L. Villard, A full-wave solver of the Maxwell’s equations in 3d cold plasmas, Computer Physics Communications 175, 250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2006.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Vallejos, T. Johnson, R. Ragona, T. Hellsten, L. Frassinetti, Effect of poloidal phasing on ion cyclotron resonance heating power absorption, Nuclear Fusion 59, 076022 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab1ab7 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Shiraiwa, J. Wright, P. Bonoli, T. Kolev, M. Stowell, RF wave simulation for cold edge plasmas using the MFEM library, EPJ Web of Conferences 157, 03048 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715703048 [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Maquet, B. Reman, D. Van Eester, R. Ragona, Implementation of a fast 2D wave-solver using the BUDE method with NGSolve, 25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas, Schloss Hohenkammer, Germany, May 19-22 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  13. O. Sauter, Nonlocal analyses of electrostatic and electromagnetic waves in hot, magnetized, nonuniform, bounded plasmas, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (1992). https://inis.iaea.org/records/tge38-1ay77 [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Fukuyama, Kinetic full wave analysis in inhomogeneous plasmas using integral form of dielectric tensor, Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids 179, 1520 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2024.2434501 [Google Scholar]
  15. P.U. Lamalle, B.C.G. Reman, C. Slaby, D. Van Eester, F. Louche, e.a. Geuzaine, C., Integral dielectric kernel approach to modelling RF heating in toroidal plasmas, 25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas, Schloss Hohenkammer, Germany, May 19-22 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  16. O. Meneghini, S. Shiraiwa, R. Parker, Full wave simulation of Lower Hybrid waves in Maxwellian plasma based on the finite element method, Physics of Plasmas 16 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3216548 [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Shiraiwa, O. Meneghini, R. Parker, P. Bonoli, M. Garrett, M. Kaufman, J. Wright, S. Wukitch, Plasma wave simulation based on a versatile finite element method solver, Physics of Plasmas 17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3396371 [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Van Eester, V. Maquet, B. Reman, H. Carpiaux, B. Valentin, E. Lerche, P. Lamalle, Almost-off-theshelf tools for ICRH modelling, 25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas, Schloss Hohenkammer, Germany, May 19-22 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Svidzinski, J. Kim, J. Spencer, L. Zhao, S. Galkin, E. Evstatiev, Hot plasma dielectric response to radio-frequency fields in inhomogeneous magnetic field, Physics of Plasmas 23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4966638 [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Svidzinski, L. Zhao, J. Kim, N. Barov, Full wave modeling of radio-frequency beams in tokamaks in the electron cyclotron frequency range, Physics of Plasmas 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194838 [Google Scholar]
  21. D.L. Green, L.A. Berry, A.B. Simpson, T.R. Younkin, Kinetic-j: A computational kernel for solving the linearized Vlasov equation applied to calculations of the kinetic, configuration space plasma current for time harmonic wave electric fields, Computer Physics Communications 225, 122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. P.U. Lamalle, B. Reman (2025), to be submitted for publication [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Aspnäs, A. Signell, J. Westerholm, Efficient assembly of sparse matrices using hashing, International Workshop on Applied Parallel Computing pp. 900–907 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-54075755-9_107 [Google Scholar]
  24. P.R. Amestoy, I.S. Duff, J.Y. L’Excellent, J. Koster, A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 23, 15 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479899358194 [Google Scholar]
  25. P.R. Amestoy, A. Guermouche, J.Y. L’Excellent, S. Pralet, Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems, Parallel computing 32, 136 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2005.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Folk, G. Heber, Q. Koziol, E. Pourmal, D. Robinson, An overview of the HDF5 technology suite and its applications, EDBT/ICDT 2011 workshop on array databases pp. 36–47 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1966895.1966900 [Google Scholar]
  27. HDF Group Hierarchical Data Format version 5, https://github.com/HDFGroup/hdf5 [Google Scholar]
  28. M.W. Scroggs, online; accessed: 16-May-2025, https://defelement.org [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Bateman, A. Erdélyi, Higher transcendental functions, volume II, Bateman Manuscript Project) Mc Graw-Hill Book Company 410 (1953). https://authors.library.caltech.edu/records/cnd32h9x80 [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Vol. 55 (Courier Corporation, 1965) [Google Scholar]
  31. J.A. Stratton, Electromagnetic theory (John Wiley & Sons, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  32. P. Solin, K. Segeth, I. Dolezel, Higher-order finite element methods (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2003), https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203488041 [Google Scholar]
  33. O.G. Ernst, M.J. Gander, Why it is difficult to solve Helmholtz problems with classical iterative methods, Numerical analysis of multiscale problems pp. 325–363 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22061-6_10 [Google Scholar]
  34. A. St-Cyr, M.J. Gander, S.J. Thomas, Optimized multiplicative, additive, and restricted additive Schwarz preconditioning, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 29, 2402 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1137/060652610 [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Dular, C. Geuzaine, F. Henrotte, W. Legros, A general environment for the treatment of discrete problems and its application to the finite element method, IEEE transactions on magnetics 34, 3395 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.717799 [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Royer, E. Béchet, C. Geuzaine, Gmsh-Fem: An efficient finite element library based on Gmsh, 14th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM), ECCOMAS Congress 2020 (2021). https://hdl.handle.net/2268/262394 [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. Güçlü, S. Hadjout, A. Ratnani, PSYDAC: a high-performance IGA library in python, 8th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (2022). [Google Scholar]
  38. E.M. Sánchez, M.C. Pinto, O. Maj et al., Time-splitting methods for the cold-plasma model using Finite Element Exterior Calculus, Journal of Computational Physics p. 114305 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114305 [Google Scholar]
  39. E. Bourne, Y. Güçlü, S. Hadjout, A. Ratnani, Pyccel: a Python-to-X transpiler for scientific high-performance computing, Journal of Open Source Software 8, 4991 (2023). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04991 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.