EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 346 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 346 (2026) 02026 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2026
25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas (RFPPC2025)
Article Number 02026
Number of page(s) 7
Section Wave Heating and Current Drive in Present and Future Fusion Devices
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634602026
Published online 07 January 2026
  1. J. Adam, Review of tokamak plasma heating by wave damping in the ion cyclotron range of frequency, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 29, 443 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/29/4/001 [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Ongena et al., Recent advances in physics and technology of ion cyclotron resonance heating in view of future fusion reactors, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 59, 054002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aa5a62 [Google Scholar]
  3. X. J. Zhang et al., First results from H-mode plasmas generated by ICRF heating in the EAST, Nucl. Fusion. 53, 023004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/53/2/023004 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. R. Wilson and P. T. Bonoli, Progress on ion cyclotron range of frequencies heating physics and technology in support of the International Tokamak Experimental Reactor, Phys. Plasmas. 22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4901090 [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Ott, B. Hui and K. R. Chu, Theory of electron cyclotron resonance heating of tokamak plasmas, No. NRL-MR-4028. Naval Research Lab. (NRL), Washington, DC (United States), 1979 [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Lloyd, Overview of ECRH experimental results, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 40, A119 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/40/8A/010 [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Zaar et al., Iterative addition of parallel non-local effects to full wave ICRF finite element models in axisymmetric tokamak plasmas, Nucl. Fusion. 64, 066017 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3c51 [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Lerche et al. Optimization of ICRH for core impurity control in JET-ILW, Nucl. Fusion. 56, 036022 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/56/3/036022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. O. Kazakov et al. Potential of ion cyclotron resonance frequency current drive via fast waves in DEMO, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 57, 025014 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/57/2/025014 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. J. Casson et al. Predictive multi-channel flux-driven modelling to optimise ICRH tungsten control and fusion performance in JET, Nucl. Fusion. 60, 066029 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab833f [Google Scholar]
  11. A. D. Siena et al., Electromagnetic turbulence suppression by energetic particle driven modes, Nucl. Fusion. 59, 124001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab4088 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Brambilla, Modelling heating and current drive in the ion cyclotron frequency range, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 35, A141 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/35/SA/009 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Brambilla, A note on the toroidal plasma dispersion function, Phys. Lett. A. 188, 376 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(94)90479-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Brambilla, Numerical simulation of ion cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 41, 1 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/41/1/002 [Google Scholar]
  15. E. F. Jaeger et al., Advances in full-wave modeling of radio frequency heated, multidimensional plasmas, Phys. Plasmas. 9, 1873-1881 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1455001 [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Vallejos et al. Effect of poloidal phasing on ion cyclotron resonance heating power absorption, Nucl. Fusion. 59, 076022 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab1ab7 [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Vallejos et al., Iterative addition of finite Larmor radius effects to finite element models using wavelet decomposition, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 62, 045022 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ab6f55 [Google Scholar]
  18. J. H. Zhang, X. J. Zhang and C. M. Qin. Finite elements method-based ICRF wave heating simulation integrating with SOL plasma for EAST tokamak, Nucl. Fusion. 62, 076032 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac5451 [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Lu et al., Ion cyclotron wave coupling in the magnetized plasma edge of tokamaks: impact of a finite, inhomogeneous density inside the antenna box, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 58, 055001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/58/5/055001 [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Usoltceva et al., Simulation of the ion cyclotron range of frequencies slow wave and the lower hybrid resonance in 3D in RAPLICASOL, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 61, 115011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ab476d [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Shiraiwa, Finite element modeling of RF waves in fusion plasmas: progress in past decades and future role, 25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas, Schloss Hohenkammer, Germany, May 19-22 (2025). https://www.ipp.mpg.de/5534048 [Google Scholar]
  22. T. H. Stix, Waves in Plasmas (New York: American Institute of Physics, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. F. Jaeger et al., All-orders spectral calculation of radio-frequency heating in two-dimensional toroidal plasmas, Phys. Plasmas. 8, 1573 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1359516 [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Van Eester, E. Lerche, and M. Evrard, A 2D finite element wave equation solver based on triangular base elements, AIP Conference Proceedings. 1187, 597 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3273822 [Google Scholar]
  25. A. J. Cerfon and J. P. Freidberg, “One size fits all” analytic solutions to the Grad–Shafranov equation, Phys. Plasmas 17, 032502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3328818 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.