EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 346 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 346 (2026) 02027 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2026
25th Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas (RFPPC2025)
Article Number 02027
Number of page(s) 8
Section Wave Heating and Current Drive in Present and Future Fusion Devices
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634602027
Published online 07 January 2026
  1. L. Garzotti et al., Development of high-current base-line scenario for high deuterium-tritium fusion performance at JET, Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 67, 075011 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ ade008 [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Van Eester et al., RF power as key contributor to high performance "baseline" scenario experiments in JET DD and DT plasmas in preparation for ITER, AIP Conf. Proc. 2984, 030004 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0162425 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Maslov et al., JET D-T scenario with optimized non-thermal fusion, Nucl. Fusion 63, 112002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ace2d8 [Google Scholar]
  4. V. K. Zotta et al., Fusion power predictions for βN 1.8 baseline scenario with 50–50 D–T fuel mix and NBI injection in preparation to D–T operations at JET (2022) Nucl. Fusion 62, 076024 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac5f19 [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Pucella et al., Onset of tearing modes in plasma termination on JET: the role of temperature hollowing and edge cooling, Nucl. Fusion 61, 046020 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abe3c7 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Chomiczewska et al., ICRH-related impurity source and control across experiments in H, D, T plasmas at JET-ILW, Nucl. Fusion 64, 076058 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad5369 [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Telesca et al., COREDIV simulations of D and D–T high current–high power Baseline pulses in JET-ITER like wall, Nucl. Fusion 64 066018 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3bcd [Google Scholar]
  8. A. R. Field et al., The impact of fuelling and W radiation on the performance of high-power, ITER-baseline scenario plasmas in JET-ILW, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 63, 095013 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ac1567 [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Piron et al., Psep/PLH control in deuterium and deuterium–tritium JET plasmas, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 67, 055006 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Barabaschi et al., ITER progresses into new baseline, Fusion Engineering and Design 215, 114990 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114990 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Hobirk et al., The JET hybrid scenario in Deuterium, Tritium and Deuterium-Tritium, Nucl. Fusion 63, 112001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1741-4326/acde8d [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Giroud et al., The core–edge integrated neonseeded scenario in deuterium–tritium at JET, Nucl. Fusion 64 106062 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1741-4326/ad69a2 [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Lerche et al., Optimization of ICRH for core impurity control in JET-ILW, Nuclear Fusion 56, 036022 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/ 56/3/036022 [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Garzotti et al., Development of a high-current, high fusion performance scenario on JET: physics insights and operational challenges, 51st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Vilnius, Lithuania 2025 [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Van Eester et al., Maximising D-T fusion power by optimising the plasma composition and beam choice in JET, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 055014 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ ac5a09 [Google Scholar]
  16. J. D. Gaffey, Energetic ion distribution resulting from neutral beam injection in tokamaks, J. Plasma Phys. 16, 149 (1976). https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0022377800020134 [Google Scholar]
  17. T. H. Stix, Waves in Plasmas, (American Institute of Physics, New York, USA, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Van Eester et al., Transient versus steady-state solutions: a qualitative study, J. Plasma Phys. 90, 995900201 (2024). https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0022377824000187 [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Kalupin et al., Numerical analysis of JET discharges with the European Transport Simulator, Nucl. Fusion 53, 123007 (2013). https://doi.org/10. 1088/0029-5515/53/12/123007 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. U. Lamalle, Nonlocal theoretical generalization and tridimensional numerical study of the coupling of an ICRH antenna to a tokamak plasma, PhD Thesis, (LPP-ERM/KMS Report 101, Université de Mons 1994) [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Hirvijoki et al., ASCOT: Solving the kinetic equation of minority particle species in tokamak plasmas, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  22. J.A. Heikkinen, S.K. Sipilä and T.J.H. Pättikangas, Monte Carlo simulation of runaway electrons in a toroidal geometry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 76, 215 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(93) 90133-W [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Van Eester and E.A. Lerche, Simple 1D Fokker–Planck modelling of ion cyclotron resonance frequency heating at arbitrary cyclotron harmonics accounting for Coulomb relaxation on non-Maxwellian populations, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53, 092001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0741-3335/53/9/092001 [Google Scholar]
  24. H.S. Bosch and G.M. Hale, Improved formulas for fusion cross-sections and thermal reactivities, Nucl. Fus. 32, 611 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0029-5515/32/4/I07 [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Huynh et al., European transport simulator modeling of JET-ILW baseline plasmas: predictive code validation and DTE2 predictions, Nucl. Fusion 61, 096019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ ac0b34 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.