Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 355, 2026
4th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies and Advances in Automation, Aerospace and Robotics (STAAAR 2025)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 18
Section Additive Manufacturing and Sustainable Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635502005
Published online 03 March 2026
  1. L. Ismail, Advancing sustainability and performance: a review on recycled aggregates and Portland slag cement in construction. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Trends 10, 1917–1923 (2024). https://doi.org/10.61137/IJSRET.VOL.10.ISSUE5.241 [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Rajashekar, D. Bandhu, K. Aravinda, M.K. Vishkarma, A. Singla, S. Ziara, Evaluation of green energy impacts for achieving global economic and environmental sustainability, in E3S Web Conf. 552, 01057 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.J. Munir, S.M.S. Kazmi, Y.F. Wu, X. Lin, M.R. Ahmad, Development of novel design strength model for sustainable concrete columns: a new machine learning-based approach. J. Clean. Prod. 357, 131988 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.131988 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. El-Hawary, A. Al-Yaqout, K. Nouh, Durability of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating slag. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Waste Resour. Manag. 172, 107–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.18.00025 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Al-Yaqout, M. El-Hawary, K. Nouh, P.B. Khan, Corrosion resistance of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating slag. ACI Mater. J. 117, 111–122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14359/51722406 [Google Scholar]
  6. O.P. Singh, N. Choudhary, Regression analysis of compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete with ground granulated blast-furnace slag and fly ash. Int. J. Concrete Technol. 8, 9–16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.37628/IJCT [Google Scholar]
  7. R.K. Majhi, A.N. Nayak, Bond, durability and microstructural characteristics of ground granulated blast furnace slag based recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 212, 578–595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.017 [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Bandhu, E. Umashankari, A. Dutt, P. Kumar, T.A.A.U. Abedi, A detailed review on sustainable engineering methods integrated with waste management practices, in E3S Web Conf. 552, 01058 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Xu et al., Modification of recycled cement with phosphogypsum and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136241 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Cheruku, R.P. Kumar, Recycling of construction and demolition waste for sustainability—an overview of the use of recycled concrete aggregates (2013). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264047629 [Google Scholar]
  11. L.F.M. Sanchez, M. Noel, G. Fathifazal, B. Damineli, Recent advances on the use of sustainable structural concrete: a materials perspective (2016). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305427923 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Sakir, S.N. Raman, M. Safuddin, A.B.M.A. Kaish, A.A. Mutalib, Utilization of by-products and wastes as supplementary cementitious materials in structural mortar for sustainable construction. Sustainability 12, 3888 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093888 [Google Scholar]
  13. R.K. Majhi, A.N. Nayak, B.B. Mukharjee, Development of sustainable concrete using recycled coarse aggregate and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 159, 417–430 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.118 [Google Scholar]
  14. R.K. Majhi, A.N. Nayak, Production of sustainable concrete utilising high-volume blast furnace slag and recycled aggregate with lime activator. J. Clean. Prod. 255, 120188 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120188 [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Voit, O. Zeman, I. Janotka, R. Adamcova, K. Bergmeister, High-durability concrete using eco-friendly slag-pozzolanic cements and recycled aggregate. Appl. Sci. 10, 8307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228307 [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Xu et al., Investigations on the rehydration of recycled blended SCMs cement. Cem. Concr. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.107036 [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Tejas, D. Pasla, Assessment of mechanical and durability properties of composite cement-based recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 387, 131620 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.131620 [Google Scholar]
  18. B.M. Johny, M.V. George, E. John, Study of properties of sustainable concrete using slag and recycled concrete aggregate. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 3, 68–72 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Yang, H. Lee, Structural performance of reinforced RCA concrete beams made by a modified EMV method. Sustainability (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010131 [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Sriravindrarajah, N.D.H. Wang, L.J.W. Ervin, Mix design for pervious recycled aggregate concrete. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 6, 239–246 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-012-0024-x [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Kim, Ł. Sadowski, The equivalent mortar volume method in the manufacturing of recycled aggregate concrete. Czasopismo Techniczne 11, 123–140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737xct.19.119.11335 [Google Scholar]
  22. E.E. Anike, M. Saidani, E. Ganjian, M. Tyrer, A.O. Olubanwo, Evaluation of conventional and equivalent mortar volume mix design methods. Mater. Struct. 53, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-1457-3 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Hayles, L.F.M. Sanchez, M. Noël, Eco-efficient low cement recycled concrete aggregate mixtures for structural applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 169, 724–732 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.127 [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Butler, J. West, S. Tighe, Effect of recycled concrete aggregate properties on mixture proportions of structural concrete. Transp. Res. Rec. 2290, 105–114 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3141/2290-14 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.