Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 356, 2026
5th International Conference on Condensed Matter and Applied Physics (ICC 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02016 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Applied Physics | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635602016 | |
| Published online | 05 March 2026 | |
- A. Nicolas, J.-L. Barrat, J. Rottler, Effects of inertia on the steady-shear rheology of disordered solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 058303 (2016) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons. Phys. Lett. 8, 214–215 (1964). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Zweig, An (SU(3)) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. CERN Reports No. 8182/TH.401 and No. 8419/TH.412 (1964). [Google Scholar]
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of two resonances in the Λ0bπ± systems and precise measurement of Σ±b and Σ*±b properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 012001 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- A. Poluektov et al. (Belle Collaboration), Evidence for direct (CP) violation in the decay B± → D*K±,D → Κ0Sπ−π+ and measurement of the CKM phase φ3. Phys. Rev. D 81, 112002 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Partial-wave analysis of J/ψ → Κ+Κ−π0. Phys. Rev. D 100, 032004 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a narrow charmoniumlike state in exclusive B± → Κ±π+π−]/ψ decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of the process e+e− → π0π0]/ψ and the neutral charmoniumlike state Zc(3900)0. Phys. Rev. D 102, 012009 (2020); arXiv:2004.13788 [hep-ex]. [Google Scholar]
- P. Krokovny et al. (Belle Collaboration), First observation of the Z0b (10610) in a Dalitz analysis of ϒ(10860) → ϒ(nS)π0π0). Phys. Rev. D 88, 052016 (2013); arXiv:1308.2646 [hep-ex]. [Google Scholar]
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of J/ψp resonances consistent with pentaquark states in Λ0b → J/ψΚ−p decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- C. Alexandrou, J. Berlin, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou, and M. Wagner, Tetraquark interpolating fields in a lattice QCD investigation of the D*s0(2317) meson. Phys. Rev. D 101, 034502 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- V. Patel, J. Oudichhya, and A. K. Rai, Spectroscopy of cccc and sscc tetraquarks within the framework of Regge phenomenology. Few-Body Syst. 66, 39 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- V. Patel, J. Oudichhya, and A. K. Rai, Spectroscopic study of ssbb and bbbb tetraquarks using Regge phenomenology. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40, 2550152 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- V. Patel, J. Oudichhya, and A. K. Rai, Mass spectra of qqqq, ssss, and qqss tetraquarks using Regge phenomenology. Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 218 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- K.-W. Wei, B. Chen, and X.-H. Guo, Some mass relations for mesons and baryons in Regge phenomenology. Phys. Rev. D 78, 056005 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- Y. Nambu, Strings, monopoles, and gauge fields. Phys. Rev. D 10, 4262–4268 (1974). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Nambu, QCD and the string model. Phys. Lett. B 80, 372–376 (1979). [Google Scholar]
- A. B. Kaidalov, Hadronic mass relations from topological expansion and string model. Z. Phys. C 12, 63–66 (1982). [Google Scholar]
- F.-X. Liu, M.-S. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Fully strange tetraquark ssss spectrum and possible experimental evidence. Phys. Rev. D 103, 016016 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- P. Lundhammar and T. Ohlsson, Nonrelativistic model of tetraquarks and predictions for their masses from fits to charmed and bottom meson data. Phys. Rev. D 102, 054018 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- R. Tiwari and A. K. Rai, Mass spectroscopy of hidden charm and hidden strange tetraquarks in the diquark-antidiquark approach. Few-Body Syst. 64, 20 (2023). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.