EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 361 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 361 (2026) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 361, 2026
ASPOWERCN 2024 – The 8th Joint Conference of Aerospace Propulsion and the 44th Aerospace Propulsion Technology Information Society (APTIS) Technical Conference
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 22
Section Heat and Mass Transfer and Integrated Thermal Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636101002
Published online 13 April 2026
  1. Pornet C, Isikveren A T. “Conceptual Design of Hybrid-Electric Transport Aircraft,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 79: 114–135. Doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.09.002. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schäfer A W, Evans A D, Reynolds T G, et al. “Costs of Mitigating CO2 Emissions from Passenger Aircraft,” Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(4): 412–417.. Doi: 10.1038/nclimate2865. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gnadt A R, Speth R L, Sabnis J S, et al. “Technical and Environmental Assessment of All-Electric 180-passenger Commercial Aircraft,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 105: 1–30. Doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.11.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barzkar A, Ghassemi M. “Electric Power Systems in More and All Electric Aircraft: A Review,” IEEE Access, 2020. Doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024168. [Google Scholar]
  5. Schäfer A W, Barrett S R H, Doyme K, et al. “Technological, Economic and Environmental Prospects of All-Electric Aircraft,” Nature Energy, 2019, 4(2): 160–166. Doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0294-x. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kakaras L F D P. “Integrated CHP with autothermal biomass gasification and SOFC–MGT,” Energy Conversion and Management, 2008: DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2007.06.013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duan L, He B, Yang Y. “Parameter optimization study on SOFC-MGT hybrid power system,” International Journal of Energy Research, 2011, 35(8):721–732. DOI:10.1002/er.1725. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tola C V. “SOFC-MGT hybrid power plants fuelled by methanol and DME,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2008. DOI:10.1007/s10800-008-9508-4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Perna A, Minutillo M, Jannelli E, et al. “Performance assessment of a hybrid SOFC/MGT cogeneration power plant fed by syngas from a biomass down-draft gasifier,” Applied Energy, 2017:80–91. Doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.077. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kawabata Y, Tachikawa Y, Taniguchi S, et al. “New Applications of SOFC-MGT Hybrid Power Generation System for Low-Carbon Society,” ECS Transactions, 2017, 78(1):197–208. Doi: 10.1149/07801.0197ecst. [Google Scholar]
  11. R Dückershoff, Berg H P, Himmelberg A, et al. “Influence on the Electrical Efficiency of a Hybrid MGT-SOFC-System by μ-fogging in a-Two-Staged Compressor System,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 886(1): 012041 (8pp). Doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/886/1/012041. [Google Scholar]
  12. Berg H P, Kleissl M, Himmelberg A, et al. “Heat balancing of direct reforming fuel cells in MGT-SOFC hybrid systems,” IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 501(1): 012007. Doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/501/1/012007. [Google Scholar]
  13. Di, Carlo, Borello, et al. “Process simulation of a hybrid SOFC/mGT and enriched air/steam fluidized bed gasifier power plant,” INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, 2013, 2013, 38(14)(-):5857–5874. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  14. Andrea, Di, Carlo, et al. “Process simulation of a hybrid SOFC/mGT and enriched air/steam fluidized bed gasifier power plant,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  15. Waters D F, Cadou C P. “Engine-Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Efficient Electrical Power Generation on Aircraft,” Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 284:588–605. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.108. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ji Z, Qin J, Cheng K, et al. “Thermodynamic Analysis of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Jet Hybrid Engine for Long-Endurance Unmanned Air Vehicles,” Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 183:50–64. Doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.076. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cocco D, Tola V. “Use of alternative hydrogen energy carriers in SOFC-MGT hybrid power plants,” Energy Conversion & Management, 2009, 50(4):1040–1048. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.12.019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Savino S, Comini G, Nonino C. “Effect of corner angle on convection enhancement in wavy ducts with trapezoidal cross-sections,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2004, 44. Doi: 10.1002/fld.686. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yau H T, Wang C C, Cho C C, et al. “A NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION INTO ELECTROOSMOTIC FLOW IN MICROCHANNELS WITH COMPLEX WAVY SURFACES, Thermal Science,” 2011, 15(suppl.1): 87–94. Doi: 10.2298/TSCI11S1087Y. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sucipta M, Kimijima S, Suzuki K. “Performance analysis of the SOFC–MGT hybrid system with gasified biomass fuel,” Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 174(1):124–135. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.102. [Google Scholar]
  21. You H, Han J, Liu Y, et al. “4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of a micro poly-generation system based on SOFC/MGT/MED and organic steam ejector refrigerator,” Energy, 2020, 206. Doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118122. [Google Scholar]
  22. Krummrein T, Henke M, Kutne P, et al. “Corrigendum to ‘Numerical analysis of operating range and SOFC-off-gas combustor requirements of a biogas powered SOFC-MGT hybrid power plant’ [Appl. Energy 232 (2018) 598-606],” Applied Energy, 2019, 235(FEB.1):1668–1668. Doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.079. [Google Scholar]
  23. Krummrein T, Henke M, Kutne P, et al. “Numerical analysis of operating range and SOFC-off-gas combustor requirements of a biogas powered SOFC-MGT hybrid power plant,” Applied Energy, 2018, 232:598–606. Doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.166. [Google Scholar]
  24. Capstone Turbine Coporation, “Advanced MicroTurbine system (AMTS): C200 micro turbine and ultra-low emissions MicroTurbine,” United States, March 31, 2007. Doi:10.2172/975026. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Lagerstrm, and M. Xie, “High Performance and Cost Effective Recuperator for Micro-Gas Turbines,” ASME Turbo Expo, 2002: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, pp. 1003–1007, June 3–6, 2002. Doi: 10.1115/GT2002-30402. [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Utriainen and B. Sundén. “Recuperators in Gas Turbine Systems.” Proceedings of the ASME 1998 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition. Vol. 3, June 2–5, 1998. Doi: 10.1115/98-GT-165. [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Utriainen, and B. Sundén, “Numerical analysis of a primary surface trapezoidal cross wavy duct,” International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, Vol. 10, No. 6 pp. 634–648, September 1, 2000. Doi: doi.org/10.1108/09615530010347213. [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Utriainen, and B. Sundén, “A Comparison of Some Heat Transfer Surfaces for Small Gas Turbine Recuperators,” Asme Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, & Air, Vol. 3, June 4–7, 2001. Doi: 10.1115/2001-GT-0474. [Google Scholar]
  29. Q. W. Wang, et al., “Experimental investigation on heat transfer and pressure drop in a microturbine recuperator with cross-wavy primary surface channels,” In: ASME turbo expo, Vol. 3, pp.293–298, June 6–9, 2005. Doi: 10.1115/GT2005-68255. [Google Scholar]
  30. H. X. Liang, Q. W. Wang, and J. W. Wang, “Experimental study on flow and heat transfer of CW primary surface recuperator for microturbine,” J Eng Thermophys, Vol. 27, pp. 865–7, September 1, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. L. X. Du, T. Ma, M. Zeng, Z. X. Guo and Q. W. Wang, “Numerical Investigations on the Thermohydraulic Performance of Cross-Wavy Channels with Multi-Periodic Boundary Conditions,” Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, Vol. 65, pp.732–749, 2014. Doi: 10.1080/10407782.2013.846634. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. W. Seo, C. Y. Cho, S. Lee, and Y. D. Choi, “Thermal Characteristics of a Primary Surface Heat Exchanger with Corrugated Channels,” Entropy, Vol. 18, pp.15, 2016. Doi: 10.3390/e18010015. [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Ma, et al., “Experimental and numerical study on heat transfer and pressure drop performance of Cross-Wavy primary surface channel,” Energy Conversion & Management, Entropy, Vol. 125, pp.80–90, 2016. Doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.055. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yue-Tzu Yang, Hsiang-Wen Tang and Shih-Jie Jian, “Numerical simulation and optimization of turbulent nanofluids in a three-dimensional wavy channel,” Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, Vol. 69, pp.1169–1185, 2016. Doi: 10.1080/10407782.2015.1125729. [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Cai, X. Huai, and W. Xi, “An optimal design approach for the annular involute-profile cross wavy primary surface recuperator in microturbine and an application case study,” Energy, Vol. 153, pp.80–89, 2018. Doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.016. [Google Scholar]
  36. X. S. Shi, Y. W. Wang, X. L. Huai, and K. Cheng, “Influence of structure parameters on entropy generation performance in cross wavy channels with fluid-solid coupled heat transfer,” Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 181, pp. 115882, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115882. [Google Scholar]
  37. H Li, et al., “Thermal performance of a microchannel primary surface recuperator for portable microturbine generators: Design and experimental study,” Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 206, pp. 118103, 2022. Doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118103. [Google Scholar]
  38. H. G. Kwon, D. H. Sang, and H. H. Cho, “Flow and heat/mass transfer in a wavy duct with various corrugation angles in two dimensional flow regimes,” Heat & Mass Transfer, Vol. 45, pp. 157–165, 2008. Doi: 10.1007/s00231-008-0422-4. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.