EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 361 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 361 (2026) 09001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 361, 2026
ASPOWERCN 2024 – The 8th Joint Conference of Aerospace Propulsion and the 44th Aerospace Propulsion Technology Information Society (APTIS) Technical Conference
Article Number 09001
Number of page(s) 17
Section Electric Propulsion
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636109001
Published online 13 April 2026
  1. Darnon F, Arrat D, d’Escrivan S, et al. Overview of electric propulsion activities in France[C]//43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. 2005: 5165. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rolfo A, Cadiou A, Secheresse O, et al. Plasma thrusters development in France[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2002, 51(1-9): 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu, D. Principles of space electric propulsion[M]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology Press, 2014:23–45. [Google Scholar]
  4. Morozov A I, Balebanov V M, Bugrova A I, et al. ATON-thruster plasma accelerator[C]//The 4th All-Russian Seminar on Problems of Theoretical and Applied Electron Optics. Moscow: SPIE, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rathsman P, Kugelberg J, Bodin P, et al. SMART-1: development and lessons learnt[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2005, 57(2-8): 455–468. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Y, & Zhang, X. (Year). Research status and prospects of various thrust-level Hall thrusters. Journal of Aerospace Power, 37(12), 2782–2796. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hargus Jr W A. Investigation of the plasma acceleration mechanism within a coaxial Hall thruster[M]. Stanford University, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  8. Haas J M. Low perturbation interrogation of the internal and near-field plasma structure of a hall thruster using a high-speed probe positioning system[M]. University of Michigan, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yu, S., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (Year). Research progress and analysis of high-power Hall electric propulsion. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 42(2), 289–297. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yu Bo, Huang Hao, Xu Yanan, et al. Study on the influence law of magnetic field on gas ionization rate of Hall thruster [J/OL]. Propulsion Technology, 1–13 [2024-03-19]. [Google Scholar]
  11. Barkalov E E, Veselovzorov A N, Pogorelov A A, et al. Composition of the beam of an SPT-100 stationary plasma thruster[J]. Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 2008, 51: 263–267. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sankovic J M, Hamley J A, Haag T W. Performance evaluation of the Russian SPT-100 thruster at NASA LeRC[C]//IEPC Conference. 1994 (IEPC-93-094). [Google Scholar]
  13. MacDonald-Tenenbaum N, Pratt Q, Nakles M, et al. Background pressure effects on ion velocity distributions in an SPT-100 Hall thruster[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(2): 403–412. [Google Scholar]
  14. Steven R O, John M S. Advanced Hall electric propulsion for future in-space transportation[C]//3rd International Spacecraft Propulsion Conference, Cannes, France. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  15. Darnon F, Arrat D, d’Escrivan S, et al. Overview of electric propulsion activities in France[C]//43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. 2005: 5165. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gascon N, Dudeck M, Barral S. Wall material effects in stationary plasma thrusters. I. Parametric studies of an SPT-100[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2003, 10(10): 4123–4136. [Google Scholar]
  17. Barral S, Makowski K, Peradzyński Z, et al. Wall material effects in stationary plasma thrusters. II. Near-wall and in-wall conductivity[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2003, 10(10): 4137–4152. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rolfo A, Cadiou A, Secheresse O, et al. Plasma thrusters development in France[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2002, 51(1-9): 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rossetti P, Casaregola C, Andrenucci M. 30 kW-Class Hall Thruster: a Key Building Block for Propulsion Needs of Future Space Transportation and Exploration[C]//32nd International Electric Propulsion Conference, IEPC-2011-211. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Szabo J, Pote B, Byrne L, et al. Eight Kilowatt Hall thruster system characterization[C]//33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, Washington, DC, United States. 2013: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Szabo J, Pote B, Hruby V, et al. A commercial one Newton Hall effect thruster for high-power in-space missions[C]//47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. 2011: 6152. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofer R R, Cusson S E, Lobbia R B, et al. The H9 magnetically shielded Hall thruster[C]//35th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Electric Rocket Propulsion Soc., 2017: 2017–232. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamhawi H, Huang W, Haag T, et al. Performance and thermal characterization of the NASA-300MS 20 kW hall effect thruster[C]//International Electric Propulsion Conference (IEPC 2013). 2013 (GRC-E-DAA-TN11609). [Google Scholar]
  24. Kamhawi H, Haag T W, Jacobson D T, et al. Performance evaluation of the NASA-300M 20 kW Hall effect thruster[J]. AIAA Paper, 2011, 5521: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hofer R R. Development and characterization of high-efficiency, high-specific impulse xenon Hall thrusters[M]. University of Michigan, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Katz I, Lopez Ortega A, Goebel D, et al. Performance and Facility Background Pressure Characterization Tests of NASA’s 12.5-kW Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding Thruster[C]//14th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference, ESA/ESTEC. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamhawi H, Huang W, Haag T, et al. Performance, Facility Pressure Effects, and Stability Characterization Tests of NASA’s Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding Thruster[C]//AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. 2016 (GRC-E-DAA-TN33862). [Google Scholar]
  28. Tu Z H, Mao W, Hu Y L, et al. Magnetic circuit design method based on size optimization in Hall thrusters [J]. Aerospace Control and Application, 2024, 50, (1): 117–126 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  29. Manzella D H, Jacobson D T, Jankovsky R S, et al. Magnetic circuit for Hall effect plasma accelerator[P]. U.S. Patent:7,624, 566, 2009-12-1. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dannenmayer K, Mazouffre S. Elementary scaling laws for sizing up and down Hall effect thrusters: Impact of simplifying assumptions[C]//Proceedings of the 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference (Ann Arbor), IEPC. 2009: 09–077. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dannenmayer K, Mazouffre S. Elementary scaling relations for Hall effect thrusters[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2011, 27(1): 236–245. [Google Scholar]
  32. Daren Y, Yongjie D, Zhi Z. Improvement on the scaling theory of the stationary plasma thruster[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21(1): 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhurin V V, Kaufman H R, Robinson R S. Physics of closed drift thrusters[J]. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 1999, 8(1): R1. [Google Scholar]
  34. Khayms V, Martinez-Sanchez M. Design of a miniaturized Hall thruster for microsatellites[C]//32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 1996: 3291. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rossi A, Messine F, HÉnaux C. Parametric optimization of a Hall effect thruster magnetic circuit[J]. Aerospace Technology Japan, 2016, 14(30):197–202. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu Zongqi, Tian Leichao, Wang Pingyang, et al. Simulation study on the influence of magnetic shield size on the performance of Hall thruster [J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science and Technology, 2023, 43(04): 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  37. Reza M, Ferrato E, Faraji F, et al. Magnetic circuit optimization for Hall thrusters design[C] //The 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Vienna: University of Vienna, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  38. Laurent B, Rossi A, Öberg M, et al. High throughput 1.5 kW Hall thruster for Satcoms[C]//The 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Vienna: University of Vienna, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  39. Richard R H, Robert S J. The influence of current density and magnetic field topography in optimizing the performance, divergence, and plasma oscillations of high specific impulse Hall thrusters[C]. //The 28th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Toulouse: AIAA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  40. Richard R H, Alec D, Gallimore. The role of magnetic field topography in improving the performance of a high voltage Hall thruster[C]//The 38th Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Washington D.C.: AIAA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. E Peng. Study on the influence of magnetic field inside the channel of Hall thruster on discharge characteristics [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  42. Keidar M, Boyd I D. On the magnetic mirror effect in Hall thrusters[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2005, 87(12):121501. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gawron D, Mazouffre S, Sadeghi N, et al. Influence of magnetic field and discharge voltage on the acceleration layer features in a Hall effect thruster[J]. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2008, 17(2): 025001. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mao W, Wu N, Hu Y L, et al. Life test research of a high specific impulse Hall thruster HEP-140MF[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2020, 22(09):157–166. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.