Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 4
Section Investigation of Atmospheric Transport and Mixing Processes in the Atmosphere using Lidar
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636203006
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. T. Schoennagel, et al., “Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes,” PNAS 114(18), 4582–4590 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  2. P. E. Dennison, et al., “Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011”. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2928–2933 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. P. J. Crutzen, et al. “Biomass Burning As a Source of Atmospheric Gases CO, H2, N2O, NO, CH3Cl, and COS”, Nature, 282(5736), 253–356 (1979). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. O. Andreae, et al., “Biomass-burning emissions and associated haze layers over Amazonia,” J. Geophys. Res., 93, 1509 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Dreessen, et al. “Observations and impacts of transported Canadian wildfire smoke on ozone and aerosol air quality in the Maryland region on June 9– 12, 2015”, J. Air & Waste Management Assoc., 66(9), 842–862 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. O. Langford, et al. “Were wildfires responsible for the unusually high surface ozone in Colorado during 2021?”, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres, 128, e2022JD037700 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Xu, et al., Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes. Sci. Adv., 7, eabl3648 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. P. S. Rickly, et al., “Influence of Wildfire on Urban Ozone: An Observationally Constrained Box Modeling Study at a Site in the Colorado Front Range”, Environ. Sci. Technol. 57(3), 1257–1267 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Wu, et al., “Intra-continental wildfire smoke transport and impact on local air quality observed by ground-based and satellite remote sensing in New York City”, Atmos. Environ., 187, 266–281 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Wu, et al., “Synergistic aircraft and ground observations of transported wildfire smoke and its impact on air quality in New York City during the summer 2018”, Science of the Total Environment, 773, 145030 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Li, et al., “Tropospheric Ozone Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) Development at New York City” In: Proceedings of the 30th International Laser Radar Conference. ILRC 2022. J. T. Sullivan et al. ed. (Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer), Cham. 71. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. A. Brotzge, et al., A Technical Overview of the New York State Mesonet Standard Network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 37, 1827–1845 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Shrestha, et al., “Overview and Applications of the New York State Mesonet Profiler Network”, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 60, 1591–1611 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Mok, et al. “Impacts of brown carbon from biomass burning on surface UV and ozone photochemistry in the Amazon Basin”, Sci. Rep., 6, doi:10.1038/srep36940 (2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.