EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 363 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 363 (2026) 01028 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 363, 2026
International Conference on Low-Carbon Development and Materials for Solar Energy (ICLDMS’26)
Article Number 01028
Number of page(s) 21
Section Energy Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636301028
Published online 16 April 2026
  1. N. J. Vignesh et al., “ENHANCING AA5083/MgAZ31B PROPERTIES VIA FRICTION STIR WELDING,” Surface Review and Letters, vol. 32, no. 10, (2025), doi: 10.1142/S0218625X24501282. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Swain, A. Shukla, and K. Badheka, “Influence of multi-fluted tool pin geometries on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of AA5083 aluminum alloy Friction stir welds,” Welding International, (2025), doi: 10.1080/09507116.2025.2599884. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. S. Kumar and M. S. Chander, “Effect of tool pin geometry on friction stir welded dissimilar aluminium alloys - (AA5083 & AA6061),” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 647-653, pp. 647–653, (2018) , [Online]. Available:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059231185&partnerID=40&md5=7be1096eb09349334bab205c9be2c04d [Google Scholar]
  4. E. C. P. Nidumolu, R. K. Pittala, and B. Yelamasetti, “A comparative study of microstructure development, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of dissimilar AA5083-AA6082 weldments produced by CMT, FSW and TIG welding processes,” Welding International, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–10, (2026), doi: 10.1080/09507116.2025.2553812. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Vinodh and N. Natrayan, “Integration of ceramic reinforcements in AA5083 composites for enhanced mechanical and thermal properties in friction stir welding,” Engineering Research Express, vol. 7, no. 3, (2025), doi: 10.1088/2631-8695/adef90. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Arora, “EFFECT OF POST PROCESSING TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN TIG WELDED AND FRICTION STIR PROCESSING OF ALUMINIUM JOINT,” Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering, vol. 167, no. A3(S), (2025), doi: 10.5750/ijme.v167iA3(S).1667. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Kothandam, L. Lenin, B. Senthamaraikannan, and P. Yogaraj, “Analyzing the Influence of Tool Plunge Depth and Frictional Heat Generation in Friction Stir Welding of Scandium-Modified Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys,” Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, vol. 78, no. 5, (2025), doi: 10.1007/s12666-025-03581-3. [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Muribwathoho, V. Msomi, and S. Mabuwa, “Optimization of FSP parameters in fabricating AA5083/Coal composites using Taguchi method,” Engineering Research Express, vol. 7, no. 1, (2025), doi: 10.1088/2631-8695/ada41a. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Mothilal and A. Kumar, “Supervised Machine learning models for predicting mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded AA7075-AA5083 aluminum alloys,” Measurement (Lond)., vol. 246, (2025), doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.116653. [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Muribwathoho, V. Msomi, and S. Mabuwa, “Optimizing FSP Parameters for AA5083/SiC Composites: A Comparative Analysis of Taguchi and Regression,” Metals (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 3, (2025), doi: 10.3390/met15030280. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Charonerat, T. Phatungthane, and C. Summatta, “Optimizing friction stir welding parameters for enhanced mechanical properties of dissimilar aluminum alloys AA5083 and AA6063: A Taguchi approach,” International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, vol. 22, no. 3, (2025), doi: 10.6703/IJASE.202509_22(3).006. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Gadakh and C. Nayak, “Multi-response optimization of process parameters for weld performances during underwater friction-stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloys AA6063-T6 and AA5083-H32,” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., vol. 39, no. 19, pp. 2985–3008, (2025), doi: 10.1080/01694243.2025.2525995. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Kumar and S. Sharma, “Influence of FSW Process Parameters on Formability and Mechanical Properties of Tailor Welded Blanks AA6082-T6 and AA5083-O Using RSM with GRA-PCA Approach,” Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 1943–1968, (2021), doi: 10.1007/s12666-021-02255-0. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Sampath, “Experimental investigation and multi-objective optimization of cryogenic Friction-stir-welding of AA2014 and AZ31B alloys using MOORA technique,” Mater. Today Commun., vol. 33, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104937. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. S. Parkhe and R. J. Patil, “Experimental Investigation and Analysis of Friction Stir Welded Aluminium AA3103 Joint by Taguchi Approach,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, (2026), doi: 10.1007/s40033-025-00979-7. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Kolli, C. Sunnapu, and N. R. Nageswara Rao, “Multi-response optimization of friction stir welding process parameter of AA 5083 with Taguchi-VIKOR approach,” Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, vol. 72, no. 1, (2025), doi: 10.1186/s44147-024-00572-x. [Google Scholar]
  17. H. C and S. Chakraborty, “Microstructure evolution and mechanical characterization of dissimilar material (AL6063-T4 and MG AZ31B) in friction stir welding,” Interactions, vol. 246, no. 1, (2025), doi: 10.1007/s10751-025-02324-6. [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Viswanathan, A. K. Babuchellam, V. Vimala, and M. Selvaraju, “Optimizing underwater friction-stir welding parameters for AA356/SiC composites using CoCoSo and MEREC: enhancing joint performance and quality,” Revista Materia, vol. 30, (2025), doi: 10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2024-0948. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Srinivasan, A. Rajakannu, S. Rajesh, J. S. Babu, G. Dinesh, and M. Selvaraju, “Friction Stir Additive Manufacturing of AA7075/Al2O3 and Al/MgB2 Composites for Improved Wear and Radiation Resistance in Aerospace Applications,” Journal of Environmental Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 295–305, (2025), doi: 10.13074/jent.2025.03.2441017. [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Dinesh Kumar et al., “Study of Microstructure and Wear Resistance of AA5052/B4C Nanocomposites as a Function of Volume Fraction Reinforcement to Particle Size Ratio by ANN,” J. Chem., vol. (2023), doi: 10.1155/2023/2554098. [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Zhang, K. Zhang, T. S. Satish Kumar, F. Alimova, S. Mehrez, and S. S Albuhamdan, “Control of microstructure, tribological and mechanical properties in friction stir processed of AA5083 matrix composites reinforced with NbMoTaTiNi refractory high-entropy particles by using a newly designed tool,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 1044, (2025), doi: 10.1016/jjallcom.2025.184524. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. D. Kumar and R. Pugazhenthi, “Achievement of Optimum Characteristics of Friction Stir Welded Joints with Varied Process Parameters,” International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 618–622, (2023), doi: 10.4273/ijvss.15.5.06. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. H. Saad, B. M. Darras, and M. A. Nazzal, “Evaluation of Welding Processes Based on Multi-dimensional Sustainability Assessment Model,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–75, (2021), doi: 10.1007/s40684-019-00184-4. [Google Scholar]
  24. D. K. Mohapatra, P. P. Mohanty, and M. Mallik, “Effect of tool profile on tensile and flexural behaviour of dissimilar friction stir welded AA 6082 and AA2024,” Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 34–44, (2026), doi: 10.1080/00084433.2025.2481708. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Clark and I. Ragai, “Utilizing Taguchi and ANOVA methods to investigate standard deviation of programmed torque for aluminum 6061-T6 friction stir welding with adaptive torque monitoring and control,” Manuf. Lett., vol. 46, pp. 1–4, (2025), doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.08.004. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Rana, S. Deswal, and N. Hooda, “Hybrid heuristic methods exercising to optimize the friction stir welding process parameters for improving the prepared butt joints mechanical properties,” World Journal of Engineering, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 675–694, (2024), doi: 10.1108/WJE-01-2023-0016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.