EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 363 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 363 (2026) 01029 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 363, 2026
International Conference on Low-Carbon Development and Materials for Solar Energy (ICLDMS’26)
Article Number 01029
Number of page(s) 16
Section Energy Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636301029
Published online 16 April 2026
  1. A. A. Barakat, A. A. Ahmed, B. M. Darras, and M. A. Nazzal, “Towards Sustainable Metal-to-Polymer Joining: A Comparative Study on Friction Stir Welding, Self-Piercing Riveting, and Adhesive Bonding,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 9, (2024), doi: 10.3390/su16093664. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Milcic, D. Klobcar, D. Milcic, N. Zdravkovic, A. Duric, and T. Vuherer, “Comparison between Mechanical Properties and Joint Performance of AA 2024-T351 Aluminum Alloy Welded by Friction Stir Welding, Metal Inert Gas and Tungsten Inert Gas Processes,” Materials, vol. 17, no. 13, (2024), doi: 10.3390/ma17133336. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. S. Baghel and P. K. Kumar Soni, “Mechanical and metallurgical characterization of friction stir welded AA2024 to pure copper using specific variables and positioning,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 238, no. 11, pp. 5014–5025, (2024), doi: 10.1177/09544062231217610. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Sharma, Z. A. Khan, A. N. Siddiquee, and M. Arif, “Study of friction stir welding effects on the microstructure & mechanical properties of AA3003 pipes,” Phys. Scr., vol. 100, no. 1, (2025), doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad9ee4. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. K. Choudhary and R. Jain, “Process mechanics and flow stream investigation during FSW of thick AA2024 plate by eccentric square pin,” Mater. Chem. Phys., vol. 345, (2025), doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.131239. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Naseri, M. Alvand, O. Imantalab, D. Gholami, and E. Borhani, “EFFECT OF POST-WELD HEAT TREATMENT ON TENSILE PROPERTIES OF FRICTION STIR-WELDED JOINTS OF NANOSTRUCTURED AA2024 ALLOY,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 791–798, (2025), doi: 10.59957/jctm.v60.i5.2025.10. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Krishna, G. Mrudula, Y. Yanda, P. Prakash, D. V Janaki, and M. V. N. V. Satyanarayana, “Mechanical Properties Enhancement in Friction Stir Processed AA2024 Alloy through Pin Profile Optimization,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 1221–1233, (2025), doi: 10.1007/s40033-024-00751-3. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Xing, J. Sun, C. Zhang, H. Shou, L. Jia, and N. Lv, “Effect of joining material direction on material flow, microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar AA2024/7075 joints fabricated by friction stir welding,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 35, pp. 3679–3692, (2025), doi: 10.1016/jjmrt.2025.02.007. [Google Scholar]
  9. F. A. Mir, N. Z. Khan, K. A. Sheikh, I. A. Badruddin, and S. Kamangar, “Performance analysis of Al stainless steel joints fabricated by friction stir welding: Microstructure, mechanical, and tribology,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, vol. 238, no. 10, pp. 1234–1246, (2024), doi: 10.1177/13506501241246841. [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Kheirabadi, B. Beidokhti, S. Khadivi, and A. Davodi, “Investigation on Microstructure and Residual Stress Distribution in Dissimilar AA3105/AA2024 Friction Stir Joints,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 33, no. 15, pp. 7763–7769, (2024), doi: 10.1007/s11665-024-09681-3. [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Jamshidi Aval, “Effect of heat input in dissimilar friction stir welding of A390-10 wt.% SiC composite-AA2024 aluminum alloy,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, (2024), doi: 10.1007/s43452-024-00957-y. [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Chekalil et al., “Effect of corrosion environments on the mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum alloy AA3003,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 33, pp. 2353–2364, (2024), doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.09.167. [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Chekalil, R. Chadli, A. Ghazi, A. Miloudi, M.-P. Planche, and A. Amrouche, “Corrosion behavior of AA3003 friction stir welded joints,” Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 680, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.(2023).132673. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. P. Das and S. Chakraborty, “In search of the best multi-criteria decision makingparticle swarm optimization-based hybrid approach for parametric optimization of friction stir welding processes,” OPSEARCH, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1764–1794, (2024), doi: 10.1007/s12597-024-00757-1. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Kumari and B. Acherjee, “A novel hybrid multi-criteria decision methodology for assessing tool materials in friction stir welding process,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 4963–4986, (2024), doi: 10.1007/s12008-024-01783-5. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. P. Edlabadkar, B. Mudadla, K. Karthick, M. S. Kumar, A. Adams, and M. Selvaraju, “Optimization of Machining Parameters and Performance Analysis of AA2024/ZrO2 Metal Matrix Composite Using TOPSIS: Insights into Squeeze Casting and Tribological Behavior,” Journal of Environmental Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 181192, (2025), doi: 10.13074/jent.2025.03.2441016. [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Viswanathan, A. K. Babuchellam, V. Vimala, and M. Selvaraju, “Optimizing underwater friction-stir welding parameters for AA356/SiC composites using CoCoSo and MEREC: enhancing joint performance and quality,” Revista Materia, vol. 30, (2025), doi: 10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2024-0948. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Srinivasan et al., “Investigation on the Mechanical Properties of Powder Metallurgy-Manufactured AA7178/ZrSiO4Nanocomposites,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. (2023), 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/3085478. [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Dinesh Kumar et al., “Study of Microstructure and Wear Resistance of AA5052/B4C Nanocomposites as a Function of Volume Fraction Reinforcement to Particle Size Ratio by ANN,” J. Chem., vol. 2023, (2023), doi: 10.1155/2023/2554098. [Google Scholar]
  20. I. Solomon, P. Sevvel, J. Gunasekaran, and J. Vasanthe Roy, “OPTIMIZING FSW PARAMETERS FOR AZ31B-AA6082 ALLOYS USING HYBRID MCDM AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE RSM MODELS: A NUMERICAL DECISION-MAKING APPROACH,” Surface Review and Letters, (2025), doi: 10.1142/S0218625X25500994. [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Sabry, “Exploring the effect of friction stir welding parameters on the strength of AA2024 and A356-T6 aluminum alloys,” Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems, vol. 8, (2024), doi: 10.1016/jjalmes.2024.100124. [Google Scholar]
  22. P. K. Mouria, R. M. Singari, and R. Wattal, “Microstructural and mechanical response of SiC and TiO2 particles reinforced friction stir welded AA7075 and AA2024,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 13311343, (2024), doi: 10.1007/s12008-023-01667-0. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Nikzad-Dinan, R. Jamaati, and H. Jamshidi Aval, “Enhanced microstructure, strength, and wear resistance of AA2024-AlB2 composites via multi-pass friction stir processing,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 36, pp. 4293–4307, (2025), doi: 10.1016/jjmrt.2025.04.043. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. A. Abolarin et al., “A CRITIC-BPNN APPROACH TO FRICTION STIR WELDING PARAMETRIC SELECTION AND PREDICTION USING AA6082-T6 MATERIAL,” Kufa Journal of Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 421–449, (2025), doi: 10.30572/2018/KJE/160123. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, “Optimization of friction stir welding processes using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method in neutrosophic fuzzy environment,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1979–1994, (2023), doi: 10.1007/s12008-023-01308-6. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.