EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 365 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 365 (2026) 06001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 365, 2026
BPU12 Congress – 12th General Conferences of the Balkan Physical Union
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Interdisciplinary Physics, Mathematical and Computational Methods
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636506001
Published online 15 April 2026
  1. W.M. Elsasser, Induction effects in terrestrial magnetism Part I. Theory. Phys. Rev. 69, 106 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.106 [Google Scholar]
  2. P.H. Roberts, G.A. Glatzmaier, Geodynamo theory and simulations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 1081–1123 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.1081 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Olson, U.R. Christensen, G.A. Glatzmaier, Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanisms of field generation and equilibration. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 104, 10383–10404 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900013 [Google Scholar]
  4. G.A. Glatzmaier, P.H. Roberts, A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal. Nature 377, 203–209 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377203a0 [Google Scholar]
  5. U.R. Christensen, J. Wicht, Numerical dynamo simulations. In: G. Schubert (ed.), Treatise on Geophysics, Vol. 8: Core Dynamics, pp. 245–282 (Elsevier, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452748-6.00149-X [Google Scholar]
  6. C.A. Jones, Planetary magnetic fields and fluid dynamos. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 583–614 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160727 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Wicht, A. Tilgner, Theory and modeling of planetary dynamos. Space Sci. Rev. 152, 501–542 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9573-y [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Aubert, T. Gastine, A. Fournier, Spherical convective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime. J. Fluid Mech. 813, 558–593 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.789 [Google Scholar]
  9. U.R. Christensen, J. Aubert, Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 97–114 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03009.x [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P.A. Davidson, Scaling laws for planetary dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 195, 67–74 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt267 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E.M. King, K.M. Soderlund, Convective heat transfer in planetary dynamo models. Proc. R. Soc. A 471, 20150216 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0216 [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Oruba, E. Dormy, Predictive scaling laws for spherical rotating dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 198, 828–847 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu154 [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Nimmo, Energetics of the core. In: G. Schubert (ed.), Treatise on Geophysics (2nd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 27–55) (Elsevier, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00142-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. B.A. Buffett, Earth's core and the geodynamo. Science 288, 2007–2012 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5473.2007 [Google Scholar]
  15. J.R. Lister, Expressions for the dissipation driven by convection in the Earth's core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 140, 145–158 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Stelzer, A. Jackson, Extracting scaling laws from numerical dynamo models. Geophys. J. Int. 193, 1265–1276 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt060 [Google Scholar]
  17. R.K. Yadav, T. Gastine, U.R. Christensen, L.D.V. Duarte, Scaling laws in spherical shell dynamos with free-slip boundaries. Geophys. J. Int. 204, 1120–1133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv489 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. K.M. Soderlund, M.H. Heimpel, E.M. King, J.M. Aurnou, Turbulent models of ice giant internal dynamics: Dynamos, heat transfer, and zonal flows. Icarus 224, 97–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2012.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Gastine, L. Duarte, J. Wicht, Dipolar versus multipolar dynamos: The influence of the background density stratification. Astron. Astrophys. 546, A19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219641 [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Aubert, Chronology of geomagnetic reversals from numerical simulations and observations. Geophys. J. Int. 214, 531–547 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy161 [Google Scholar]
  21. H.K. Moffatt, Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids. Cambridge University Press (1978). [Google Scholar]
  22. F.H. Busse, Homogeneous dynamos in planetary cores and in the laboratory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 383–408 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.383 [Google Scholar]
  23. P.H. Roberts, E.M. King, On the genesis of the Earth's magnetism. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 096801 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/9/096801 [Google Scholar]
  24. S.I. Braginsky, P.H. Roberts, Equations governing convection in Earth's core and the geodynamo. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 79, 1–97 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/03091929508228992 [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Schaeffer, D. Jault, H.-C. Nataf, A. Fournier, Turbulent geodynamo simulations: a leap towards Earth's core. Geophys. J. Int. 211, 1–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx265 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. U.R. Christensen, Dynamo scaling laws and applications to the planets. Space Sci. Rev. 152, 565–590 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9553-2 [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Gastine, J. Wicht, J.M. Aurnou, Turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in spherical shells. J. Fluid Mech. 808, 690–732 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.684 [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Dormy, L. Oruba, Free decay modes in rotating spherical fluid shells. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 111, 274–300 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03091929.2017.1313264 [Google Scholar]
  29. C.A. Jones, A dynamo model of Jupiter's magnetic field. Icarus 241, 148–159 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.06.020 [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Schaeffer, Efficient spherical harmonic transforms aimed at pseudo-spectral numerical simulations. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 751–758 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20071 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M.A. Calkins, K. Julien, S.M. Tobias, J.M. Aurnou, A multiscale dynamo model driven by quasi-geostrophic convection. J. Fluid Mech. 780, 143–166 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.470 [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Schaeffer, D. Jault, H.-C. Nataf, A. Fournier, Turbulent geodynamo simulations: a leap towards Earth's core. Geophys. J. Int. 211, 1–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx265 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Marti, N. Schaeffer, R. Hollerbach, D. Cebron, C. Nore, F. Luddens, J.L. Guermond, J. Aubert, Full sphere hydrodynamic and dynamo benchmarks. Geophys. J. Int. 197, 119–134 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt518 [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Aubert, T. Gastine, A. Fournier, Spherical convective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime. J. Fluid Mech. 813, 558–593 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.789 [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Vidal, N. Schaeffer, P. Cardin, Magnetic induction by helical waves in a rotating sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 851, 371–406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.509 [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Aubert, Geomagnetic acceleration and rapid hydromagnetic wave dynamics in advanced numerical simulations of the geodynamo. Geophys. J. Int. 222, 1365–1383 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa238 [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Raynaud, E. Dormy, Intermittency and self-similarity in numerical dynamos. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 306, 106552 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106552 [Google Scholar]
  38. E.M. King, K.M. Soderlund, Convective heat transfer in planetary dynamo models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333-334, 1–10 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.03.038 [Google Scholar]
  39. K.M. Soderlund, The role of buoyancy in generating zonal flow and magnetic fields in planetary interiors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0289 [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Gastine, J. Wicht, J.M. Aurnou, Turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in spherical shells. J. Fluid Mech. 808, 690–732 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.684 [Google Scholar]
  41. J.M. Aurnou, M.A. Calkins, J.S. Cheng, K. Julien, E.M. King, D. Nieves, K.M. Soderlund, S. Stellmach, Rotating convective turbulence in Earth and planetary cores. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 246, 52–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  42. U.R. Christensen, Iron snow, stable layers and core evolution. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 247, 45–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2015.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  43. W. Dietrich, J. Wicht, A hemispherical dynamo model: Implications for the Martian crustal magnetization. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 123, 574–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005371 [Google Scholar]
  44. P.A. Davidson, The role of Ekman pumping and helicity in planetary dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. 198, 1832–1847 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu221 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.