EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 365 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 365 (2026) 07008 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 365, 2026
BPU12 Congress – 12th General Conferences of the Balkan Physical Union
Article Number 07008
Number of page(s) 18
Section Physics Education, History and Philosophy of Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636507008
Published online 15 April 2026
  1. Knight, R. D., & Burciaga, J. R. (2004). Five Easy Lessons: Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching. Am. J. Phys. 72(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1639012 [Google Scholar]
  2. Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. Am. J. Phys. 50(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12989 [Google Scholar]
  3. McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Phys. Today 37(7), 24–32. [Google Scholar]
  4. Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common Sense Concepts About Motion. Am. J. Phys. 53, 1056–1065. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arons, A. B. (1990). A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching. Wiley, 23–50. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 64–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuczmann, I. (2021). Misconceptions in mechanics and their elimination. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1929, 012005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lyu, X. (2024). Exploring the Cognitive Obstacles in High School Students' Learning of Physics and Mechanics. Contemporary Education Frontiers 2(2). [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, H. (2020). A Study on the Thinking Obstacles of High School Students in Physics and Mechanics Learning. China New Communications 20(18), 205. [Google Scholar]
  10. Haize, R. (2020). Exploration of Problem-Solving Skills and Application Practice in High School Physics Mechanics. Science and Technology Wind 2020(09), 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bryan, J. A. (2010). Investigating the conservation of mechanical energy using video analysis: four cases. Phys. Educ. 45(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/1/005 [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosi, T., Onorato, P., & Oss, S. (2021). Learning motion concepts using Augmented Reality Active Learning (AnReAL) activities. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1929, 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012036 [Google Scholar]
  13. Rojas, T., & Arias Navarro, E. (2025). Applying video analysis to oscillatory motion: a tool for experimental physics. Phys. Educ. 60(3), 035019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brungardt, J. B., & Zollman, D. (1995). Influence of interactive videodisc instruction using simultaneous-time analysis on kinematics graphing skills of high school physics students. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 32(8), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320808 [Google Scholar]
  15. Caetano, T. C., Moreira, C. C., & Junior, M. F. R. (2024). Computer-Aided Experiments (CAE): A Study Regarding a Remote-Controlled Experiment, Video Analysis, and Simulation on Kinematics. IEEE Trans. Educ. 67(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3349092 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown, D. (2023). Tracker (6.1.3) [Software]. Available: https://physlets.org/tracker/ [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown, D., & Cox, A. J. (2009). Innovative Uses of Video Analysis. Phys. Teach. 47(3), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1119/L3081296 [Google Scholar]
  18. Wee, L. K., Chew, C., Goh, G. H., Tan, S., & Lee, T. L. (2012). Using Tracker as a pedagogical tool for understanding projectile motion. Phys. Educ. 47(4), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/47/4Z448 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wee, L. K., Tan, K. K., Leong, T. K., & Tan, C. (2015). Using Tracker to understand 'toss up' and free fall motion: A case study. Phys. Educ. 50(4), 436. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/50/4/436 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fianti, et al. (2020). Video tracker analysis: a strategy for measuring students communication and collaboration skill. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1567, 022019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Prima, E. C., Mawaddah, M., Winarno, N., & Sriwulan, W. (2016). Kinematics investigations of cylinders rolling down a ramp using Tracker. AIP Conf Proc. 1708. https://doi.org/10.1063/L4941183 [Google Scholar]
  22. Amoroso, A., & Rinaudo, M. (2018). Study of oscillatory motion using smartphones and tracker software. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1076, 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1076/1Z012013 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bhakat, P., Chakraborty, S., & Mandal, P. (2024). Tracking the Motion of a Simple Pendulum with Tracker. Reson. 29, 1085–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-024-1085-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Claessens, T. (2017). Analyzing Virtual Physics Simulations with Tracker. Phys. Teach. 55(9), 558–560. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5011834 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sarkar, S. (2022). Video Based Analysis Using Tracker Software for Solving Problems in Mechanics. Reson. 27, 1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-022-1455-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Putri, R. T., Alhusni, H. Z., & Lestari, N. A. (2023). Design and Prototype Testing of the Video Tracker Analysis-Based Uniformly Varied Rectilinear Motion Tool for Uniformly Accelerated and Decelerated Rectilinear Motion Experiments. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2623, 012035. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hirt, C., Claessens, S., Fecher, T., Kuhn, M., Pail, R., & Rexer, M. (2013). New ultrahigh resolution picture of Earth's gravity field. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40(16), 4279–4283. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50838 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. NIST Reference on Constants, Units and Uncertainty: Standard acceleration of gravity. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value7gn [Google Scholar]
  29. Bissell, J. J. (2023). Proof of the small angle approximation sin 9 « öusing the geometry and motion of a simple pendulum. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 56(3), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2258885 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.