EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 367 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 367 (2026) 04009 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 367, 2026
Fifth International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Automation and Control Technologies (RIACT 2026)
Article Number 04009
Number of page(s) 17
Section AI & Machine Learning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636704009
Published online 29 April 2026
  1. Olawade, D. B., David-Olawade, A. C., Wada, O. Z., Asaolu, A. J., Adereni, T., & Ling, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in healthcare delivery: Prospects and pitfalls. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 3, 100108. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldasoro, I., Gambacorta, L., Korinek, A., Shreeti, V., & Stein, M. (2024). Intelligent financial system: how AI is transforming finance. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ifenthaler, D., Majumdar, R., Gorissen, P., Judge, M., Mishra, S., Raffaghelli, J., & Shimada, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Implications for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(4), 1693–1710. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aijaz, N., Lan, H., Raza, T., Yaqub, M., Iqbal, R., & Pathan, M. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in agriculture: Advancing crop productivity and sustainability. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 101762. [Google Scholar]
  5. Herath, H. M. K. K. M. B., & Mittal, M. (2022). Adoption of artificial intelligence in smart cities: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100076 [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. Heliyon, 10(21). [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulut, O., Beiting-Parrish, M., Casabianca, J. M., Slater, S. C., Jiao, H., Song, D., ... & Morilova, P. (2024). The rise of artificial intelligence in educational measurement: Opportunities and ethical challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18900. [Google Scholar]
  8. Karaçeper, R. D., & Kıray, G. (2026). ChatGPT-4o as an automated scoring tool for writing assessment: Strengths and weaknesses. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 13(1), 66–94. [Google Scholar]
  9. Faldu, K., Sheth, A., Kikani, P., Gaur, M., & Avasthi, A. (2021). Towards tractable mathematical reasoning: Challenges, strategies, and opportunities for solving math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05364. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cimatti, A., Griggio, A., Schaafsma, B. J., & Sebastiani, R. (2013, March). The mathsat5 smt solver. In International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (pp. 93–107). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sangwin, Christopher. (2007). Assessing elementary algebra with STACK. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 38. 987- 1002. 10.1080/00207390601002906. [Google Scholar]
  12. Roth, Vicki & Ivanchenko, Volodymyr & Record, Nicholas. (2008). Evaluating student response to WeBWorK, a web-based homework delivery and grading system. Computers & Education. 50. 1462–1482. 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gomes, Dipta. (2024). Intelligent Tutoring System A Comprehensive Study of Advancements in Intelligent Tutoring Systems through Artificial Intelligence Education Platform. 10.4018/979-8-3693-6170-2.ch008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lan, A. S., Vats, D., Waters, A. E., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2015, March). Mathematical language processing: Automatic grading and feedback for open response mathematical questions. In Proceedings of the second (2015) ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 167–176). [Google Scholar]
  15. Weegar, R., & Idestam-Almquist, P. (2024). Reducing workload in short answer grading using machine learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2), 247–273. [Google Scholar]
  16. Morris, W., Holmes, L., Choi, J. S., & Crossley, S. (2025). Automated scoring of constructed response items in math assessment using large language models. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 35(2), 559–586. [Google Scholar]
  17. Baral, S., Botelho, A. F., Erickson, J. A., Benachamardi, P., & Heffernan, N. T. (2021). Improving Automated Scoring of Student Open Responses in Mathematics. International Educational Data Mining Society. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, F., Xi, X., Cui, Z., Li, D., & Zeng, W. (2023). Automatic essay scoring method based on multi-scale features. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6775. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, M., Baral, S., Heffernan, N., & Lan, A. (2022). Automatic short math answer grading via in-context meta-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15219. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.