Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2017
ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 06024 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Integral Experiments, Benchmarks and Data Validation | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714606024 | |
Published online | 13 September 2017 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714606024
Benchmarking comparison and validation of MCNP photon interaction data
1 Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 3DB, UK
2 Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
a e-mail: Bethany.Colling@ukaea.uk
Published online: 13 September 2017
The objective of the research was to test available photoatomic data libraries for fusion relevant applications, comparing against experimental and computational neutronics benchmarks. Photon flux and heating was compared using the photon interaction data libraries (mcplib 04p, 05t, 84p and 12p). Suitable benchmark experiments (iron and water) were selected from the SINBAD database and analysed to compare experimental values with MCNP calculations using mcplib 04p, 84p and 12p. In both the computational and experimental comparisons, the majority of results with the 04p, 84p and 12p photon data libraries were within 1σ of the mean MCNP statistical uncertainty. Larger differences were observed when comparing computational results with the 05t test photon library. The Doppler broadening sampling bug in MCNP-5 is shown to be corrected for fusion relevant problems through use of the 84p photon data library. The recommended libraries for fusion neutronics are 84p (or 04p) with MCNP6 and 84p if using MCNP-5.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.