Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 176, 2018
The 28th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 28)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 10005 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Large-scale campaigns | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817610005 | |
Published online | 13 April 2018 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817610005
Aerosol profiling during the large scale field campaign CINDI-2
1
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), The Netherlands
2
BIRA-IASB, Brussels, Belgium
3
IUP-Bremen, Germany
4
MPIC, Mainz, Germany
5
IUP-Heidelberg, Germany
6
Bodeker Scientific, Alexandra, New Zealand
7
Various countries world-wide
Published online: 13 April 2018
For the validation of space borne observations of NO2 and other trace gases from hyperspectral imagers, ground based instruments based on the MAXDOAS technique are an excellent choice, since they rely on similar retrieval techniques as the observations from orbit. To ensure proper traceability of the MAXDOAS observations, a thorough validation and intercomparison is mandatory. Advanced MAXDOAS observation and retrieval techniques enable inferring vertical structure of trace gases and aerosols. These techniques and their results need validation by e.g. lidar techniques.
For the proper understanding of the results from passive remote sensing techniques, independent observations are needed that include parameters needed to understand the light paths, i.e. in-situ aerosol observations of optical and microphysical properties, and essential are in particular the vertical profiles of aerosol optical properties by (Raman) lidar.
The approach used in the CINDI-2 campaign held in Cabauw in 2016 is presented in this paper and the results will be discussed in the presentation at the conference.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.