Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 213, 2019
EFM18 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2018
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02076 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Contributions | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921302076 | |
Published online | 28 June 2019 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921302076
Investigation of the velocity field downstream of a benchmark vent using numerical simulation and hot-wire anemometry
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Energy institute, Technicka 2896/2, Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
* Corresponding author: jan.sip@vutbr.cz
Published online: 28 June 2019
The velocity field in the area behind the automotive vent was measured by hot-wire anenemometry in detail and intensity of turbulence was calculated. Numerical simulation of the same flow field was performed using Computational fluid dynamics in commecial software STAR-CCM+. Several turbulence models were tested and compared with Large Eddy Simulation. The influence of turbulence model on the results of air flow from the vent was investigated. The comparison of simulations and experimental results showed that most precise prediction of flow field was provided by Spalart-Allmaras model. Large eddy simulation did not provide results in quality that would compensate for the increased computing cost.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.