Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
ANIMMA 2021 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04010 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Research Reactors and Particle Accelerators | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125304010 | |
Published online | 19 November 2021 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125304010
Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device
1
CEA Cadarache, DES/IRESNE/DER, F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France
2
CEA Cadarache, DES/DIMP/DCET, F-13108 Saint-Paul lez-Durance, France
3
CEA Saclay, DES/ISAS/DM2S, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
4
CEA Cadarache, DES/DIMP/DPED, F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France
5
CEA Saclay, DES/ISAS/DMN, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Published online: 19 November 2021
The development of the JHR experimental devices rely on the operational feedback from previous French material testing reactors (i.e. SILOE and OSIRIS). The experimental devices used for the irradiation of structural material were already facing technological limitations, in particular regarding the control of irradiation temperature and of the thermal gradients in the experimental samples, which is essential to ensure the quality of the experiments. Obtaining satisfactory thermal fields (in compliance with the setpoint and the homogeneity) is all the more difficult as the level of nuclear heating is higher in the JHR. This paper attempts to characterize the irradiation conditions in different experimental positions of the JHR and to compare them with the conditions and the empirical criteria of maximum acceptable temperature measured in OSIRIS. The study shows that the irradiation conditions obtained inside the experimental devices can sometimes be significantly different from the measured conditions using instrumentation devices. The interpretation of the experimental results and their transposition to other situations will always require a calculation versus measurement adjustment and the intensive use of computer simulation. However, despite all simulation and transposition efforts, the control of temperature conditions is not yet fully demonstrated and nothing will ultimately replace experimental validation.
Key words: Material Test Reactor (MTR) / differential calorimeter / experimental devices / Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.