Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 313, 2024
22nd Joint Workshop on Electron Cyclotron Emission and Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (EC22)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02002 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Experiment | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202431302002 | |
Published online | 15 November 2024 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202431302002
Appearance and analysis of a reflecting coating damage
1 Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany
2 Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Atomistilor Str 409, Magurele 077125, Romania
3 see author list of H. Zohm et al., 2024 Nucl. Fusion, https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad249d
* Corresponding author: Martin.Schubert@ipp.mpg.de
Published online: 15 November 2024
Eight reflecting gratings are installed into the plasma facing wall of ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) in order to provide a controlled second pass through the plasma centre in 140 GHz heating scenarios with reduced single pass absorption. Four of these gratings are machined out of W1.4901 steel and coated with tungsten to increase the reflectivity. During plasma operation three of them worked very well, only one showed a strong correlation between the launcher On-time and an unusual increase in plasma radiation. After completion of the 2022 experimental campaign, this tile was carefully inspected. Traces of local melting were visible and the tile was examined with a scanning electron microscope to determine the surface material composition. The image of backscattered electrons revealed that tungsten is missing locally and along some of the ridges of the complex topology of this grating. Within these areas, the steel surface started to melt, which is in accordance with the assumption, that an intact tungsten coating indeed prevents the steel from melting. The damaged tile is currently being replaced and we have implemented two measures in order to prevent such damage on the new tile. The first measure is to consequently finish all machining steps before the coating procedure. This is because a mechanical damage of the coating before the installation could not be ruled out. The second measure is to control and minimize the surface roughness after machining and before the coating procedure. It turned out that the roughness was up to 3 microns in the past, which seems to be too high for the desired quality of this particular coating. We have tested and developed an electropolishing procedure to decrease the surface roughness to the order of 1 micron and keep the grating topology as precise as possible.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.