Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 77, 2014
16th International Congress of Metrology
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20147700003 | |
| Published online | 19 August 2014 | |
- BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland 1995 [Google Scholar]
- BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML “Evaluation of Measurement Data – Supplement 2 to the ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement’ – Extension to any number of output quantities”, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, JCGM 102, 2011 [Google Scholar]
- S. Eichstädt, F. Schmähling, G. Wübbeler, K. Anhalt, L. Bünger, U. Krüger and C. Elster “Comparison of the Richardson-Lucy method and a classical approach for spectrometer bandpass correction” Metrologia 50, 107 – 118, 2013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Link, A. Täubner, W. Wabinski, Th. Bruns and C. Elster “Modelling accelerometers for transient signals using calibration measurements upon sinusoidal excitation” Measurement 40 928–35, 2007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. D. Hale, A. Dienstfrey, J. C. M. Wang, D. F. Williams, A. Lewandowski, D. A. Keenan and T. S. Clement “Traceable Waveform Calibration With a Covariance-Based Uncertainty Analysis” IEEE Trans. on Instr. Meas. 58, 10, 3554pp, 2009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer Discrete-Time Signal Processing Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989 [Google Scholar]
- S. Eichstädt “Analysis of Dynamic Measurements - Evaluation of dynamic measurement uncertainty” PhD Thesis, PTB-Bericht IT-16, 2012 [Google Scholar]
- A. Link and C. Elster “Uncertainty evaluation for IIR (infinite impulse response) filtering using a statespace approach” Meas. Sci. Technol. 20, 055104 (5pp), 2009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Elster and A. Link “Uncertainty evaluation for dynamic measurements modelled by a linear timeinvariant system” Metrologia 45, 464–473, 2008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Eichstädt, A. Link, P. Harris and C. Elster “Efficient implementation of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation in dynamic measurements” Metrologia 49, 401–410, 2012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Eichstädt, C. Elster, T. J. Esward and J. P. Hessling “Deconvolution filters for the analysis of dynamic measurement processes: a tutorial” Metrologia 47, 522–533, 2010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. J. Parker and R. P. Bitmead “Approximation of stable and unstable systems via frequency response interpolation” Automatic Control: Proc. 10th Triennial World Congress of IFAC International Congress of Metrology, Munich, Germany, pp 357, 1987 [Google Scholar]
- R. Vuerinckx, Y. Rolain, K. Schoukens and R. Pintelon “Design of stable IIR filters in the complex domain by automatic delay selection” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 44, 2339 – 44, 1996 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- http://www.ptb.de/cms/en/fachabteilungen/abt8/fb-84/ag-842/dynamischemessungen-842.html visited 2013-05-16 [Google Scholar]
- A. Link, A. Täubner, W. Wabinski, T. Bruns and C. Elster “Calibration of accelerometers: determination of amplitude and phase response upon shock excitation” Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, 1888–1894 2006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.