EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 106 (2016) EPJ Web of Conferences, 106 (2016) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 106, 2016
ISRD 15 – International Symposium on Reactor Dosimetry
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Transport Calculations (Neutron and Gamma-Ray) and Modeling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610603004
Published online 03 February 2016
  1. American Society for Testing and Materials, “Standard Guide for Characterizing Neutron Exposures in Iron and Low Alloy Steels in Terms of Displacements per Atom (DPA)”, ASTM E693 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Petrovic, “Integral Inherently Safe Light Water Reactor (I2S-LWR) Concept – Promoting Safety and Economics”, Nuclear Engineering International, pp. 26–29 (March 2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Petrovic, “Integral Inherently Safe Light Water Reactor (I2S-LWR) Concept: Extending SMR Safety Features to Large Power Output”, Proceedings of ICAPP 2014 Charlotte, USA, Paper 14311 (April 6–9, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Petrovic, K.W. Burn, M. Ciotti, L. Casalini, M. Sarotto, F. Franceschini, M. Carelli, J. Sejvar, J. Johnson, C. Lombardi, J. McKillop, D. Hartmangruber, “Design Features of the IRIS Reactor to Reduce Collective Dose During Operation and Maintenance and to Simplify D&D”, Proc. 8th Intl. Conf. on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids, Dubrovnik, Croatia, paper S2-52 (May 16–20, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. American Society for Testing and Materials, “Standard Guide for Application of Neutron Transport Methods for Reactor Vessel Surveillance”, E706 (IID), ASTM E482-89 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  6. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Calculational and Dosimetry Methods for Determining Pressure Vessel Neutron Fluence”, Regulatory Guide 1.190 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  7. R.E. Maerker, M.L. Williams, and B.L. Broadhead, “Accounting for Changing Source Distribution in Light Water Reactor Surveillance Dosimetry Analysis”, Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 94 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  8. G.P. Cavanaugh et al., “Reduction in Reactor Vessel Irradiation Through Fuel Management”, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 45, p. 98 (October 1983) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Todosow et al., “Pressure Vessel Fluence Reduction Through Selective Fuel Assembly Replacement”, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 45, p. 595 (October 1983) [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Cokinos et al., “Pressure Vessel Damage Fluence Reduction by Low-Leakage Fuel Management”, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 45, p. 594 (October 1983) [Google Scholar]
  11. L.E. Steele, “Neutron Irradiation Embrittlement of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels”, IAEA Technical Report Series No. 163, Inernational Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria (1975) [Google Scholar]
  12. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials, Regulatory Guide 1.99 Revision 2 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  13. SCALE: A Modular Code System for Performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluations, ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.1, Vols. I–III (June 2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. Computing Radiation Dose to Reactor Pressure Vessel and Internals: State of the Art, report NEA/NSC/DOC(96)5, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (1997) [Google Scholar]
  15. D.E. Peplow, MAVRIC: Monaco with Automated Variance Reduction using Importance Calculations. ORNL/TM-2005/39. UT-Battelle, LLC. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (January 2009) [Google Scholar]
  16. J.C. Wagner and A. Haghighat, “Automated Variance Reduction of Monte Carlo Using Discrete Ordinates Adjoint Functions”, Nuclear Science & Engineering, Vol. 128, 186–208 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  17. J.C. Wagner, E.D. Blakeman, & D.E. Peplow, “Forward-Weighted CADIS Method for Global Variance Reduction”, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 97. pp. 630–633 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Todosow and J.F. Carew, “Evaluation of Selected Approximations Used in Pressure Vessel Fluence Calculations”, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 46, p. 658 (June 1984) [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Petrovic and A. Haghighat, “Effects of SN Method Numerics on Pressure Vessel Neutron Fluence Calculations”, Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 22, 167–193 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Haghighat, M. Mahgerefteh, and B. Petrovic, “Evaluation of the Uncertainties in the Source Distribution for Pressure Vessel Neutron Fluence Calculations”, Nuclear Technology, Vol. 109, 54–75 (January 1995) [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Franceschini, B. Petrovic, “Impact of the Detailed Fission Source Distribution on IRIS Shielding Analyses”, Nuclear Technology, Vol. 168, 431–437 (2009) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.