Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2017
ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
Article Number 02021
Number of page(s) 5
Section Evaluation
Published online 13 September 2017
  1. G. de Saussure, L.C. Leal, R. Perez, N.M. Larson, and M.S. Moore, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 103, 109 (1989) [CrossRef]
  2. N.M. Larson, Updated Users' Guide for SAMMY: Multi-level R-Matrix Fits to Neutron Data Using Bayes's Equations, ENDF-364/R2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA (2008). Available at Radiation Safety Information Computational Center (RSICC) as PSR-158
  3. Stéphane Cathalau, Amal Benslimane, Abdelmajid Maghnouj, and Philippe Fougeras, ”Qualification of the JEFF2.2 Cross Sections in the Epithermal and Thermal Energy Ranges Using a Statistical Approach,” Nucl. Sci. Eng. 121, 326 (1995) [CrossRef]
  4. L.C. Leal, H. Derrien, N.M. Larson, and R.Q. Wright, “R-Matrix Analysis of 235U Neutron Transmission and Cross-Section Measurements in the 0- to 2.25-keV Energy Range”, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 131, 230 (1999) [CrossRef]
  5. M. Fukushima, Y. Kitamura, T. Kugo and S. Okajima, “Benchmark models for criticalities of FCA-IX assemblies with systematically changed neutron spectra”, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., Published online: Jun (2015)
  6. International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments, NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency September 2006 (rev)
  7. NEA/NSC/WPEC/DOC(2011)433, Final Report of WPEC Subgroup 29 on 235U Capture Cross-section in the keV to MeV Energy Region, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2011
  8. Y. Danon, “Nuclear Data Measurements at RPI”, 2011 Cross Section Evaluation Working Group Meeting, National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, November 16, 2011
  9. M. Jandel et al., “New Precision Measurements of the 235U(n,γ) Cross Section”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Carlson A.D. et al. “International Evaluation of Neutron Cross Section Standards”, N. D. S. (2009) 3215-3324 (pg 3291). See also
  11. L. Erradi, A. Santamarina, and O. Litaize, “The Reactivity Temperature Coefficient Analysis in Light Water Moderated UO2 and UO2-PuO2 Lattices”, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 144, 47 (2003) [CrossRef]
  12. R.R. Spencer, J.A. Harvey, N.W. Hill, and L. Weston, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 96, 318 (1987) [CrossRef]
  13. J.A. Harvey, N.W. Hill, F.G. Perey, G.L. Tweed, and L.C. Leal, Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Mito, Japan, May 30– June 3, 1988
  14. R. Gwin, R.R. Spencer, R.W. Ingle, J.H. Todd, and S.W. Scoles, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 88, 37 (1984) [CrossRef]
  15. L.W. Weston and J.H. Todd, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 111, 415 (1992) [CrossRef]
  16. L.W. Weston and J.H. Todd, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 88, 567 (1984) [CrossRef]
  17. C. Paradela et al. “High accuracy 235U(n,f) data in the resonance region”, The European Physical Journal, Vol. 111 (2016), WONDER-2015 4th International Workshop on Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor Application, Aix-en-Provence, France, 5–8 October 2015
  18. C. Wagemans, P. Schillebeeckx, A.J. Deruyter, and R. “Subthermal Fission Cross Section Measurements for 235U and 239Pu”, Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, p. 91, Mito, Japan (1988)
  19. J.A. Wartena, H. Weigmann, and C. Burkholz, Report IAEA Tecdoc 941, 123 (1987)
  20. H. Weigmann, P. Geltenbort, B. Keck, K. Shrenckenbach, and J.A. Wertena, Proc. Intern. Conf. on The Physics of Reactors, Marseille P1, 133 (1990)
  21. R.B. Perez, G. de Saussure, and E.G. Silver, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 52, 46 (1973) [CrossRef]
  22. G. de Saussure, R. Gwin, L.W. Weston, and R.W. Ingle, “Simultaneous Measurements of the Neutron Fission and Capture Cross Section for 235U for Incident Neutron Energy from 0.4 eV to 3 keV”, ORNL/TM-1804, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Oak Ridge, TN (1967)

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.