Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2017
ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
Article Number 04045
Number of page(s) 4
Section Fission Physics and Observables
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714604045
Published online 13 September 2017
  1. IAEA IRDFF: the IAEA Coordinated Research Projection Testing and Improving the International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File ([IRDFF]). https://www-nds.iaea.org/IRDFFtest/ [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Martini et al., NEANDC(E)-161U,152 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Košťál, M. Schulc, V. Rypar, E. Novák, S. Zaritskyi, VVER-1000 Mock-up Physics Experiments in Heaxagonal Lattices (1.275 cm pitch) of Low Enriched U(2.0, 3.0, 3.3 wt.% 235U)O2 Fuel Assemblies in Light Water with H3BO3, LR(0) – VVER – RESR - 002, benchmark OECD, NEA, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Košťál, Z. Matěj, F. Cvachovec, V. Rypar, E. Losa, J. Rejchrt, F. Mravec, M. Veškrna, Measurement and calculation of fast neutron and gamma spectra in well defined cores in LR-0 reactor, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 120, 45–50 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Košťál, M. Švadlenková, P. Baroň et al., Measurement of 23Na(n,2n) cross section in well-defined reactor spectra, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 111, 1-7 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Košťál, V. Rypar, J. Milčák, V. Juříček, E. Losa, B. Forget, S. Harper, Study of graphite reactivity worth on well-defined cores assembled on LR-0 reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 87, 601–611 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Košťál, M. Švadlenková, P. Baroň et al., Determining the axial power profile of partly flooded fuel in a compact core assembled in reactor LR-0. Ann. Nucl. Energy 90, 450–458 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Košťál, M. Veškrna, F. Cvachovec et al., Comparison of fast neutron spectra in graphite and FLINA salt inserted in well-defined CORE assembled in LR-0 reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 83, 216–225 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Košťál, V. Rypar, M. Schulc et al., Measurement of 75As(n,2n) cross section in well-defined spectrum of LR-0 special core, Ann. Nucl. Energy 100, 42–49 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Goorley, et al., Initial MCNP6 Release Overview, Nuclear Technology 180, 298–315 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Žerovnik, M. Podvratnik, L. Snoj, On normalization of fluxes and reaction rates in MCNP criticality calculations. Ann. Nucl. Energy 63, 126–128 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  12. M.B. Chadwick, P. Obložinský et al., ENDF/B-VII.0: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. Nucl. Data Sheets 107, 2931–3060 (2006) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Koning, R. Forrest, M. Kellett, R. Mills, H. Henriksson and Y. Rugama, The JEFF-3.1 Nuclear library, NEA 6190 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Koning et al., Status of the JEFF Nuclear data library, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Korea, p. 1057 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Shibata, O. Iwamoto, T. Nakagawa et al., JENDL-4.0: A new library for nuclear science and engineering, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1–30 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Shibata, T. Kawano, T. Nakagawa et al., Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 3 Revision 3: JENDL-3.3, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 39, 1125 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Zabrodskaya, A. Ignatyuk, V. Kosheev et al., ROSFOND – Russian national library of neutron data VANT, Ser. Nucl. Const. pp. 1–21 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  18. Z.G. Ge et al., The updated version of Chinese evaluated nuclear data library (CENDL-3.1), Proceedings of international conference on nuclear data for science and technology, Jeju Island, Korea, April, pp. 26–30 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  19. M.B. Chadwick, E. Eupont et al., The CIELO collaboration, Nuclear Data Sheets 118, April 1–25 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R.E. Mac Farlane and D.W. Muir, The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, Version 91, LA-12740-M (1994) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.