EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 170 (2018) EPJ Web Conf., 170 (2018) 07001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 170, 2018
ANIMMA 2017 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 07001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Safeguards, homeland security
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817007001
Published online 10 January 2018
  1. D. Henzlova, R. Kouzes, R. McElroy, P. Peerani, M. Aspinall, K. Baird, A. Bakel, A. Borella, M. Bourne, L. Bourva, F. Cave, R. Chandra, D. Chernikova, S. Croft, G. Dermody, A. Dougan, J. Ely, E. Fanchini, P. Finocchiaro, V. Gavron, M. Kureta, K. Ianakiev, K. Ishiyama, T. Lee, C. Martin, K. M. Kinny, H. Menlove, C. Orton, A. Pappalardo, B. Pedersen, D. Peranteau, R. Plenteda, S. Pozzi, M. Schear, M. Seya, E. Siciliano, S. Stave, L. Sun, M. Swinhoe, H. Tagziria, J. Takamine, S. Vaccaro, A. L. Weber, T. Yamaguchi, H. Zhu, “Current status of helium-3 alternative technologies for nuclear safeguards,” prepared for National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, and The Euratom Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), Dec. DOI: 10.2172/1227248 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Enqvist, K. J. Weinfurther, M. Flaska and S. A. Pozzi, “Characterization of a mixed multiplicity counter based on liquid organic scintillators,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 58, pp. 2413–2420, Oct. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2011.2164554 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. L. Dolan, E. C. Miller, A. C. Kaplan, A. Enqvist, M. Flaska, A. Tomanin, P. Peerani, D. L. Chichester and S. A. Pozzi, “Passive measurement of organic-scintillator neutron signatures for nuclear safeguards applications,” in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. and Med. Imag. Conf. (NSS/MIC), Anaheim, CA, USA, 2012, pp. 203–206. DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551093. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. J. Joyce, K. A. A. Gamage, M. D. Aspinall, F. D. Cave and A. D. Lavietes, “A 4-channel multiplex analyzer for real-time, parallel processing of fast scintillators,” in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. and Med. Imag. Conf. (NSS/MIC), Anaheim, CA, USA, 2012, pp. 134–138. DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551077. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. K. Polack, A. Poitrasson-Riviere, M. C. Hamel, K. Ito, S. D. Clarke, M. Flaska, S. A. Pozzi, A. Tomanin and P. Peerani, “Image reconstruction of shielded mixed-oxide fuel using a dual-particle imaging system,” in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. and Med. Imag. Conf. (NSS/MIC), Seattle, WA, USA, 2014, pp. 1–4. DOI:10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431091. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. J. Joyce, K. A. A. Gamage, M. D. Aspinall, F. D. Cave and A. D. Lavietes, “Real-time, fast neutron coincidence assay of plutonium with a 4-channel multiplexed analyzer and organic scintillators,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1340–1348, Jun. 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. J. Joyce, J. Adamczyk, M. D. Aspinall, F. D. Cave and R. Plenteda, “Real-time, fast neutron detection for stimulated safeguards assay,” in Proc. of 37th ESARDA Symp. on Safeguards and Nucl. Non-Proliferation, Manchester, UK, 2015, pp. 54–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. M. O. Parker, M. D. Aspinall, A. Couture, F. D. Cave, C. Orr, B. Swinson and M. J. Joyce, “Active fast neutron singles assay of 235U enrichment in small samples of triuranium octoxide,” Progress in Nucl. Energy., vol. 93, pp. 59–66, Jul. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.07.022 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Sarwar, M. J. Joyce and C. H. Zimmerman, “Real-time fast-neutron plutonium assay for storage and ageing applications,” in 2nd Annual Meeting DISTINCTIVE University Consortium, Bristol, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Poitrasson-Riviere, M. Flaska, M. C. Hamel, J. K. Polack, M. F. Becchetti, B. M. Wieger, A. Enqvist, S. D. Clarke and S. A. Pozzi, “Digital data acquisition and processing for a neutron-gamma-ray imaging system,” in Nucl. Sci. Symp. and Med. Imag. Conf. (NSS/MIC), Anaheim, CA, USA, 2012, pp. 1597–1599. DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551381. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. J. Joyce, S. Agar, M. D. Aspinall, J. S. Beaumont, E. Colley, M. Colling, J. Dykes, P. Kardasopoulos and K. Mitton, “Fast neutron tomography with real-time pulse-shape discrimination in organic scintillation detectors,” Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 834, pp. 36–45, Jul. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.07.044 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. R. Gilmore, “Spectrometer Calibration,” in Practical Gamma-ray Spectrometry, 2nd ed. Chichester, England: Wiley, 2008, ch. 7, pp. 143–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. D. Aspinall, M. J. Joyce, F. D. Cave, R. Plenteda and A. Tomanin, “Automated response matching for organic scintillation detector arrays,” Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A., vol. 861, pp. 46–54, Jul. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.05.00. 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Marrone, D. Cano-Ott, N. Colonna, C. Domingo, F. Gramegna, E. Gonzalez, F. Gunsing, M. Heil, F. Käppeler, P. Mastinu, P. M. Milazzo, T. Papaevangelou, P. Pavlopoulos, R. Plag, R. Reifarth, G. Tagliente, J. L. Tain and K. Wisshak, “Pulse shape analysis of liquid scintillators for neutron studies,” Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 490, no. 1-2, pp. 299–307, Sep. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01063-X 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. S. Hartwig and P. Gumplinger, “Simulating response functions and pulse shape discrimination for organic scintillation detectors with Geant4,” Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 737, pp. 155–162, Feb. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.11.027 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. D. Aspinall, M. Joyce, A. Lavietes, R. Plenteda, F. Cave, H. Parker, A. Jones and V. Astromskas, “Real-time capabilities of a digital analyzer for mixed-field assay using scintillation detectors,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 945–950, Mar. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2017.2654512 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.