EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 170, 2018ANIMMA 2017
|Number of page(s)||6|
|Section||Safeguards, homeland security|
|Published online||10 January 2018|
- A.P. Simpson, et al., “A review of neutron detection technology alternatives to helium-3 for safeguards applications,” INMM 52nd Annual Meeting, vol. 8, 2011.
- P. Peerani, et al., “Testing on novel neutron detectors as alternatives to 3He for security applications,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A, vol. 696, pp. 110–120, Dec. 2012. [CrossRef]
- P. Buzhan, et al., “Silicon photomultiplier and its possible applications,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A vol. 504, no. 1-3, pp. 48–52, May 2003. [CrossRef]
- P. K. Lightfoot, “Characterisation of a silicon photomultiplier device for applications in liquid argon based neutrino physics and dark matter searches,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 3, Oct. 2008. [CrossRef]
- AdvanSiD, Trento, Italy
- First Sensor, Berlin, Germany
- Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan
- Ketek, Munich, Germany
- SensL, Cork, Ireland
- R. Brun and F. Rademakers, “ROOT – An object oriented data analysis framework,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A., vol. 389, no. 1-2, pp. 81–86, Apr. 1997. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Eljen, Sweetwater, Texas, United States of America
- M. L. Roush, “Pulse shape discrimination,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 31, no.1, pp. 112–124, Dec. 1964. [CrossRef]
- C. Liao and H. Yang, “Pulse shape discrimination using EJ-299-33 plastic scintillator coupled with a Silicon Photomultiplier array,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A., vol. 789, pp. 150–157, Jul. 2015. [CrossRef]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.