Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 200, 2019
The International Symposium on Education in Astronomy and Astrobiology (ISE2A 2017)
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 01 February 2019
  1. Carayol, N. and Nguyen Thi, T. U., Why Do Academic Scientists Engage in Interdisciplinary Research?, 2004, revised 2005, on: (15.08.2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. Conway, S. M., Life’s Solution. Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fischer, J., Exzentrische Positionalität im Kosmos. Weltraumfahrt im Blick der modernen Philosophischen Anthropologie, edited by J. Fischer and D. Spreen, Soziologie der Weltraumfahrt, transcript, Bielefeld, 2014, pp. 21-40. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer,J. and Spreen, D., Soziologie der Weltraumfahrt. Zur Einleitung, edited by J. Fischer and D. Spreen, Soziologie der Weltraumfahrt, transcript, Bielefeld, 2014, pp. 7-20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Frodeman, R., Interdisciplinary research and academic sustainability: managing knowledge in an age of accountability, Environmental Conservation, Vol. 38, No 2, 2011, pp.105-112, on: (15.08.2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. Gould, S. J., Nonoverlapping Magisteria, Natural History 106 (1997), pp 16-22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Green, Brian P., Is it ethical to colonize Mars?, accessed September 16 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  8. Kolb, Michael Spiel als Phänomen-Das Phänomen Spiel. Studien zu phänomenologischanthropologischen Spieltheorien, Sankt Augustin 1990. [Google Scholar]
  9. McKay, Christopher, Zubrin, Robert, Do Indigenous Martian Bacteria have Precedence over Human Exploration?, accessed September 16 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  10. Metzger, N. and Zare, R. N., Interdisciplinary Research: From Belief to Reality, Science, Vol. 283, no. 5402, 1999, pp. 642-643, on:˜jorcutt/VO/Metzger_and_Zare.pdf (15.08.2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W. and Allen, B., Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, October 1997, on: (15.08.2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. Rammert, W., Technik-Handeln-Wissen. Zu einer pragmatistischen Technik- und Sozialtheorie, 2nd, revised edition, Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sherwood, B, Ponce, A., Waltemathe, M., Forward Contamination of Ocean Worlds: A Stakeholder Conversation, 68th International Astronautical Congress, Adelaide, Australia. Copyright 2017 by Caltech/JPL. Published by the IAF, with permission and released to the IAF to publish in all forms., IAC-17.A1.6.1x40187 [Google Scholar]
  14. Sokal, A., Bricmont, J., Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science, New York: Picador 1998. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sokal, A. D., Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity", Social Text, 46/47 (1996),pp. 217-252, doi:10.2307/466856, retrieved 30 September 2017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spreen, D., Weltraum, Körper und Moderne. Eine soziologische Annäherung an den astronautischen Menschen und die Cyborggesellschaft, edited by J. Fischer and D. Spreen, Soziologie der Weltraumfahrt, transcript, Bielefeld, 2014, pp. 41-88. [Google Scholar]
  17. The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy, The design and delivery of inter- and pluri-disciplinary research", Proceedings from MUSCIPOLI Workshop Two, Report from The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy 2002/7, on: (15.08.2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. Vogel, Walter, Religionspädagogik kommunikativ-vernetzt. Möglichkeiten religionspädagogischer Arbeit im Internet, Münster, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weinberg, Steven, Sokal’s Hoax, The New York Review of Books, Volume XLIII, No. 13, pp 11-15, August 8, 1996, on:, (15.02.2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. Ziman, J., Prometheus bound: Science in a dynamic steady state, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.