EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 213 (2019) EPJ Web Conf., 213 (2019) 02017 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 213, 2019
EFM18 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2018
Article Number 02017
Number of page(s) 8
Section Contributions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921302017
Published online 28 June 2019
  1. Y. Tamura, Advanced Environmental Wind Engineering (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, NY, 2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. X. Xie, Z. Huang, and J. Wang, Atmos. Environ. 39, 4519 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Rafailidis, Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 85, 255 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. F. Yassin, Atmos. Environ. 45, 5220 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Takano and P. Moonen, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 123, 107 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Ferrari, M. G. Badas, M. Garau, A. Seoni, and G. Querzoli, HARMO 2016 17th Int. Conf. Harmon. Atmospheric Dispers. Model. Regul. Purp. Proc. 351 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. G. Badas, S. Ferrari, M. Garau, and G. Querzoli, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 162, 24 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Ferrari, M. G. Badas, M. Garau, A. Seoni, and G. Querzoli, Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 62, 22 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Garau, M. G. Badas, S. Ferrari, A. Seoni, and G. Querzoli, Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 167, 123 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. N. Meroney, M. Pavageau, S. Rafailidis, and M. Schatzmann, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 62, 37 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  11. K. J. Craig, D. J. D. Kock, and J. A. Snyman, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 44, 551 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Bagieński, Environ. Prot. Eng. 32, 37 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Mensink and G. Cosemans, Environ. Model. Softw. 23, 288 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  14. Z. Baratian-Ghorghi and N. B. Kaye, Sci. Total Environ. 443, 112 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Baratian-Ghorghi and N. B. Kaye, J. Vis. 16, 29 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. A. Souto, C. Moral, A. Rodríguez, S. Saavedra, J. J. Casares, and A. Hernández-Garces, Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 55, 139 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Ghermandi, S. Teggi, S. Fabbi, A. Bigi, and M. M. Zaccanti, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 693 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Ghermandi, S. Fabbi, M. Zaccanti, A. Bigi, and S. Teggi, Atmospheric Pollut. Res. 6, 382 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Š. Nosek, L. Kukačka, R. Kellnerová, K. Jurčáková, and Z. Jaňour, Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 159, 259 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Š. Nosek, L. Kukačka, K. Jurčáková, R. Kellnerová, and Z. Jaňour, Environ. Pollut. 227, 125 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Di Bernardino, P. Monti, G. Leuzzi, and G. Querzoli, Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 62, 291 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Di Bernardino, P. Monti, G. Leuzzi, and G. Querzoli, Urban Clim. 24, 80 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. D. Bernardino, P. Monti, G. Leuzzi, F. Sammartino, and S. Ferrari, HARMO 2017 18th Int. Conf. Harmon. Atmospheric Dispers. Model. Regul. Purp. Proc. 460 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  24. T. R. Oke, Energy Build. 11, 103 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  25. M. G. Badas, M. Garau, G. Querzoli, L. Salvadori, and S. Ferrari, Int. J. Environ. Pollut. In press, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Farell and A. K. S. Iyengar, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 79, 11 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. B. Blocken, Build. Environ. 91, 219 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoydysh, W.G., Griffiths, R.A., and Owaga, Y., in Proc. 67th Annu. Meet. Air Pollut. Control Assn Denver Colo. June 9-13 1974 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Ferrari, EPJ Web Conf. 143, 01001 (2017). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. L. A. Besalduch, M. G. Badas, S. Ferrari, and G. Querzoli, EPJ Web Conf. 45, 01012 (2013). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. L. A. Besalduch, M. G. Badas, S. Ferrari, and G. Querzoli, EPJ Web Conf. 67, 02007 (2014). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Ferrari and G. Querzoli, J. Hydraul. Res. 48, 632 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Ferrari and G. Querzoli, EPJ Web Conf. 92, 02018 (2015). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Ferrari, M. Badas, and G. Querzoli, Water 10, 726 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Ferrari, M. G. Badas, and G. Querzoli, EPJ Web Conf. 180, 02025 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Ferrari, M. G. Badas, and G. Querzoli, EPJ Web Conf. 114, 02022 (2016). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Querzoli, Atmos. Environ. 30, 2821 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  38. M. G. Badas and G. Querzoli, Exp. Fluids 50, 1093 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  39. F. Simone, M. G. Badas, L. A. Besalduch, and Q. Giorgio, Int. Symp. Turbul. Shear Flow Phenom. TSFP 2013 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Garau, M. G. Badas, S. Ferrari, A. Seoni, and G. Querzoli, Int. J. Environ. Pollut. In press, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Ferrari, L. Rossi, and J. C. Vassilicos, in Adv. Turbul. XI Proc. 11th EUROMECH Eur. Turbul. Conf. (2007), pp. 485–487. [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Ferrari and L. Rossi, Exp. Fluids 44, 873 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Ferrari, P. Kewcharoenwong, L. Rossi, and J. C. Vassilicos, in IUTAM Symp. Flow Control MEMS, edited by J. F. Morrison, D. M. Birch, and P. Lavoie (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2008), pp. 267–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Lardeau, S. Ferrari, and L. Rossi, Phys. Fluids 20, 127101 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. L. Rossi, S. Bocquet, S. Ferrari, J. M. Garcia de la Cruz, and S. Lardeau, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 30, 505 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  46. M. Garau, M. G. Badas, S. Ferrari, A. Seoni, and G. Querzoli, HARMO 2017 18th Int. Conf. Harmon. Atmospheric Dispers. Model. Regul. Purp. Proc. 470 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  47. M. G. Badas, S. Espa, S. Fortini, and G. Querzoli, EPJ Web Conf. 92, 02004 (2015). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Espa, M. G. Badas, S. Fortini, G. Querzoli, and A. Cenedese, Eur. J. Mech. BFluids 35, 9 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.