Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2020
ANIMMA 2019 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 8
Section Fundamental Physics
Published online 20 January 2020
  1. T. Shea, “Proton beam measurement strategy for the 5 MW European Spallation Source target”, in Proc. IBIC2013, 2013, pp. 349–352. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Cheymol, A. Jansson, and T. J. Shea, “Wire scanner design for the European Spallation Source”, in Proc. IBIC2013, 2013, pp. 830–832. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Thomas et al., “Design and implementation of non-invasive profile monitors for the ESS LEBT”, in Proc. IBIC’16, 2016, pp. 551–554. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  4. W. DeLuca, “Beam Detection using Residual Gas Ionization”, in Proc. PAC1969, 1969, pp. 813–822. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Krider, “Residual gas beam profile monitor”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 660 – 663, 1989. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Wittenburg, “Experience with the Residual Gas Ionisation Beam Profile Monitors at the DESY Proton Accelerators”, in Proc. EPAC1992, 1992, pp. 1133–1135. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Satou, N. Hayashi, S. Lee, and T. Toyama, “A prototype of Residual Gas Ionization Profile Monitor for J-PARC RCS”, in Proc. EPAC2006, 2006, pp. 1163–1165. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Giacomini, P. Forck, J. D. Villiers, J. Dietrich, and D. Liakin, “Ionization Profile monitors - IPM @ GSI”, in Proc. DIPAC2011, 2011, pp. 419–421. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  9. D. K. Morris et al., “Operational use of ionization profile monitors in the Fermilab Main Injector”, in Proc. NA-PAC2011, 2011, pp. 519–521. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Egberts, “IFMIF-LIPAc Beam Diagnostics. Profiling and Loss Monitoring Systems”, Theses, Universit´e Paris Sud - Paris XI, Sep. 2012. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Storey et al., “Development of an Ionization Profile Monitor Based on a Pixel Detector for the CERN Proton Synchrotron”, in Proc. IBIC2015, 2015, pp. 470–473. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  12. ——, “First Results From the Operation of a Rest Gas Ionisation Profile Monitor Based on a Hybrid Pixel Detector”, in Proc. IBIC’17, 2017, pp. 318–322. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  13. Tanabashi et al., “Review of particle physics”, Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, p. 030001, Aug 2018. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Kamakura, N. Sakamoto, H. Ogawa, H. Tsuchida, and M. Inokuti, “Mean excitation energies for the stopping power of atoms and molecules evaluated from oscillator-strength spectra”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, no. 6, p. 064905, sep 2006. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Weiss and W. Bernstein, “Energy required to produce one ion pair for several gases”, Physical Review, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1828–1831, jun 1955. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Bichsel, D. H. Peirson, J. W. Boring, A. Green, M. Inokuti, and G. Hurst, “Average energy required to produce an ion pair, ICRU Report 31”, Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 18–32, may 1979. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Schindler, R. Veenhof et al. (2019) Garfield++ - simulation of tracking detectors. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Smirnov, “Modeling of ionization produced by fast charged particles in gases”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 554, no. 1–3, pp. 474–493, dec 2005. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W. W. M. Allison and J. H. Cobb, “Relativistic Charged Particle Identification by Energy Loss” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 253–298, dec 1980. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Wanzenberg. (2010, May) Nonlinear Motion of a Point Charge in the 3D Space Charge Field of a Gaussian Bunch. Hamburg, Germany. [Online]. Available: 10-01.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Thomas, F. Belloni, and J. Marroncle, “Space Charge Studies for the Ionisation Profile Monitors for the ESS Cold Linac”, in Proc. IBIC’16, 2016, pp. 556–559. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Belloni et al., “Space Charge Effects Studies for the ESS Cold Linac Beam Profiler”, in Proc. IBIC’18, 2018, pp. 371–374. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Ramo, “Currents induced by electron motion”, Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 584–585, sep 1939. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Shockley, “Currents to conductors induced by a moving point charge”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 9, no. 10, p. 635, 1938. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  25. J. L. Wiza, “Microchannel plate detectors”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 162, no. 1–3, pp. 587–601, jun 1979. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Chaumont, F. Lalu, M. Salome, A.-M. Lamoise, and H. Bernas, “A medium energy facility for variable temperature implantation and analysis”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 193 – 198, 1981. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. X. Llopart, R. Ballabriga, M. Campbell, L. Tlustos, and W. Wong, “Timepix, a 65k programmable pixel readout chip for arrival time, energy and/or photon counting measurements”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 581, no. 1, pp. 485 – 494, 2007. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Kraus, M. Holik, J. Jakubek, M. Kroupa, P. Soukup, and Z. Vykydal, “FITPix — fast interface for timepix pixel detectors”, Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 6, no. 01, pp. C01 079–C01 079, jan 2011. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P.-Y. Beauvais et al., “Status report on the saclay high-intensity proton injector project (IPHI).” in Proc. EPAC2000, 2000, pp. 283–285. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  30. R. Gobin et al., “High intensity beam production at CEA/Saclay for the IPHI project”, in Proc. ECRIS2016, 2016, pp. 83–85. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  31. F. Sene et al., “Increase of IPHI Beam Power at CEA Saclay”, in Proc. IPAC’18, 2018, pp. 694–696. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.