Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2020
ANIMMA 2019 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 04023
Number of page(s) 6
Section Research Reactors
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202022504023
Published online 20 January 2020
  1. C. Demazière, P. Vinai, M. Hursin, S. Kollias, and J. Herb, “Overview of the CORTEX project,” in PHYSOR 2018: Reactor Physics Paving The Way Towards More Efficient Systems, 2018, pp. 2971–2980. [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Pakari, V. Lamirand, G. Perret, P. Frajtag, and A. Pautz, “Kinetic Parameter Measurements in the CROCUS Reactor Using Current Mode Instrumentation,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2456–2460, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Lamirand, G. de Izarra, A. Krasa, G. Perret, O. V. Pakari, M. Hursin, P. Blaise, J. Wagemans, and A. Pautz, “Intercomparison of neutron noise measurement systems in the CROCUS reactor,” in Proceedings of PHYSOR 2018, 2018, p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Hursin, O. Pakari, G. Perret, P. Frajtag, V. Lamirand, I. Pazsit, V. Dykin, G. Por, H. Ferroukhi, and A. Pautz, “Measurement of the gas velocity in a water-air mixture in CROCUS by neutron noise technique,” in International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2019), 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Boehmer, M. Grantz, W. Hansen, D. Hinke, J. Konheiser, H.-C. Mehner, K. Noack, R. Schneider, I. Stephan, and S. Unholzer, “Investigation of Gamma and Neutron Energy Fluences in Iron -Water Benchmark Configurations for the Verification of Monte Carlo Calculations and their Application in Reactor Material Dosimetry,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., vol. 39, no. sup2, pp. 947–950, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Rais, V. Lamirand, O. Pakari, A. Laureau, J. Pohlus, C. Pohl, M. Hursin, C. Demazière, and A. Pautz, “Towards the validation of neutron noise simulators: qualification of data acquisition systems,” in International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2019), 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Lamirand, M. Hursin, G. Perret, P. Frajtag, O. Pakari, and A. Pautz, “Future experimental programmes in the CROCUS reactor,” in RRFM/IGORR 2016, 2016, no. 02–2016, pp. 284–292. [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Lamirand, P. Frajtag, D. Godat, M. Hursin, G. Perret, O. V. Pakari, A. Laureau, A. Rais, C. Fiorina, M. Chadwick, and A. Pautz, “The COLIBRI programme in CROCUS: development and licensing of a fuel rods oscillator,” in RRFM/IGORR 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. U. Kasemeyer, R. Früh, J. M. Paratte, and R. Chawla, “Benchmark on Kinetic Parameters in the CROCUS Reactor,” in International Reactor Physics Experiments Handbook (IRPhE), no. 4440, OECD, Ed. 2007, p. 94. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. M. Paratte, R. Früh, U. Kasemeyer, M. a. Kalugin, W. Timm, and R. Chawla, “A benchmark on the calculation of kinetic parameters based on reactivity effect experiments in the CROCUS reactor,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 739–748, May 2006. [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Lamirand, P. Frajtag, D. Godat, M. Hursin, G. Perret, O. Pakari, A. Rais, C. Fiorina, and A. Pautz, “The COLIBRI programme in CROCUS : characterisation of the fuel rods oscillator,” in ANIMMA 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.