EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 247 (2021) EPJ Web Conf., 247 (2021) 02028 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 02028
Number of page(s) 9
Section Core Analysis Methods
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124702028
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. E. Fridman and E. Shwageraus, “Modeling of SFR cores with Serpent-DYN3D codes sequence,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 53, pp. 354–363 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Nikitin, E. Fridman, and K. Mikityuk, “Solution of the OECD/NEA neutronic SFR benchmark with Serpent-DYN3D and Serpent-PARCS code systems,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 75, pp. 492–497 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Nikitin, E. Fridman, and K. Mikityuk, “On the use of the SPH method in nodal diffusion analyses of SFR cores,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 85, pp. 544–551 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Nikitin and E. Fridman, “Modeling of Phenix End-of-Life control rod withdrawal tests with the Serpent-DYN3D code system,” IAEA-CN-245, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, June 26 – 29, 2017 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Nikitin and E. Fridman, “Extension of the reactor dynamics code DYN3D to SFR applications – Part I: Thermal expansion models,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 119, pp. 382-389 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Nikitin and E. Fridman, “Extension of the reactor dynamics code DYN3D to SFR applications – Part II: Validation against the Phenix EOL control rod withdrawal tests, ”Annals of Nuclear Energy, 119, pp. 411-418 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Nikitin and E. Fridman, “Extension of the reactor dynamics code DYN3D to SFR applications – Part III: Validation against the initial phase of the Phenix EOL natural convection test, ”Annals of Nuclear Energy, 119, pp. 390-395 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Nikitin and E. Fridman, “Modeling of the FFTF isothermal physics tests with the Serpent and DYN3D codes,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 132, pp. 679-685 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. GIF, “Technology Roadmap Update for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” https://www.gen-4.org/gif/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-03/gif-tru2014.pdf (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. CEA, 4th-Generation Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors - The ASTRID Technological Demonstrator, Technical Report, CAE, France (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Sun, Analysis of Advanced Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor Core Designs with Improved Safety Characteristics, PhD Thesis, EPFL, Laussane, France (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Oshkanov, O. Saraev, M. Bakanov, P. Govorov, O. Potapov, Y. M. Ashurko, V. Poplavskii, B. Vasil’ev, Y. L. Kamanin, and V. Ershov, “30 years of experience in operating the BN-600 Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor,” Atomic energy, 108(4), pp. 234–239 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Yamaki, K. Inoue, A. Suzuoki, and S. Shingai, “Current status of liquid metalcooled fast breeder reactor safety research,” Hitachi Hyoron, 64(8), pp. 611–614 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Tassone, A. Smirnov, and G. Tikhomirov, “Specifications for a coupled neutronics thermalhydraulics SFR test case,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 781(1), IOP Publishing (2017). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Bortot, F. Alvarez-Velarde, E. Fridman et al. “European benchmark on the ASTRID-like lowvoid-effect core characterization: neutronic parameters and safety coefficients,” Proceedings of ICAPP 2015, Nice, France, Mary 03-05, 2015 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Gabrielli, A. Rineiski, B. Vezzoni et al., “ASTRID-like Fast Reactor Cores for Burning Plutonium and Minor Actinides,” Energy Procedia, 71, pp. 130-139 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Rydlewicz, Modelling of the ASTRID-like Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor with the Serpent-DYN3D code system, MPhil Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Kavenoky, The SPH homogenization method, Technical Report, CEA Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires de Cadarache, Cadarache, France (1978). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Hebert and A. Kavenoky, Development of the SPH homogenization method, Technical Report, CAE, Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires de Cadarache, Cadarache, France (1981). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Hebert, “A consistent technique for the pin-by-pin homogenization of a pressurized water reactor assembly,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, 113(3), pp. 227–238 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Courau, M. Cometto, E. Girardi, and N. Schwartz, “Elements of validation of pin-by-pin calculations with the future EDF calculation scheme based on APOLLO2 and COCAGNE codes,” Proceedings of the 2008 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants-ICAPP’08, Anaheim (CA), USA, June 9-12, 2008, pp. p. 2439-2448 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  22. U. Grundmann and S. Mittag, “Super-homogenisation factors in pinwise calculations by the reactor dynamics code DYN3D,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 38(10), pp. 2111–2119 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.