Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 03021
Number of page(s) 13
Section Deterministic Transport
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. J. Tramm, B. Forget, and K. Smith. “Early experience in full core reactor simulation with The Random Ray Method.” In PHYSOR 2018: Reactor Physics Paving The Way Towards More Efficient Systems, pp. 486–497. Cancun (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Smith. “Nodal Method Storage Reduction by Non-linear Iteration.” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society (1983), volume 44 (1983). URL [Google Scholar]
  3. J. R. Tramm, K. S. Smith, B. Forget, and A. R. Siegel. “ARRC: A random ray neutron transport code for nuclear reactor simulation.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 112(Supplement C), pp. 693–714 (2018). URL [Google Scholar]
  4. J. R. Tramm, K. S. Smith, B. Forget, and A. R. Siegel. “The Random Ray Method for neutral particle transport.” Journal of Computational Physics, volume 342, pp. 229 – 252 (2017). URL [Google Scholar]
  5. J. R. Tramm. “Development of The Random Ray Method of neutral particle transport for high-fidelity nuclear reactor simulation.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering (2018). URL [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Mazumdar and S. B. Degweker. “Solution of neutron transport equation by Method of Characteristics.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 77, pp. 522–535 (2015). URL [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Boyd, S. Shaner, L. Li, B. Forget, and K. Smith. “The OpenMOC method of characteristics neutral particle transport code.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 68, pp. 43–52 (2014). URL [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Sciannandrone, S. Santandrea, and R. Sanchez. “Optimized tracking strategies for step MOC calculations in extruded 3D axial geometries.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 87, pp. 49–60 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Boyd, N. Gibson, B. Forget, and K. Smith. “An analysis of condensation errors in multi-group cross section generation for fine-mesh neutron transport calculations.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 112, pp. 267 – 276 (2018). URL [Google Scholar]
  10. R. M. Ferrer and J. Rhodes. “Extension of linear source MOC methodology to anisotropic scattering in CASMO5.” In PHYSOR 2014 - The Role of Reactor Physics toward a Sustainable Future (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. R. M. Ferrer, J. Rhodes, and K. Smith. “Linear source approximation in CASMO5.” In PHYSOR 2012 – Advances in Reactor Physics – Linking Research, Industry, and Education (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. T. J. Rao. “Mean of ratios or ratio of means or both?” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, volume 102(1), pp. 129–138 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. A. Smith and E. Lewis. “Benchmark on deterministic transport calculations without spatial homogenisation – A 2-D/3-D MOX fuel assembly benchmark.” Technical Report ISBN 92-64-02139-6, Nuclear Energy Agency: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2003). [Google Scholar]
  14. R. J. Brissenden and A. R. Garlick. “Biases in the estimation of Keff and its error by Monte Carlo methods.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, volume 13(2), pp. 63–83 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  15. F. B. BROWN. “‘K-effective of the world’ and other concerns for Monte Carlo eigenvalue calculations.” Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology, volume 2(0), pp. 738–742 (2011). URL [Google Scholar]
  16. M. I. Belghazi, A. Baratin, S. Rajeswar, S. Ozair, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and R. D. Hjelm. “Mutual information neural estimation.” In 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2018), volume 2, pp. 864–873 (2018). URL [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Smith and B. Forget. “Challenges in the development of high-fidelity LWR core neutronics tools.” In International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2013), pp. 1809–1825 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.