Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 06049
Number of page(s) 18
Section Advanced Modelling and Simulation
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. J. Rhodes, K. Smith, and D. Lee, “CASMO-5 Development and Applications,” PHYSOR-2006, Vancouver, Canada, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Fabbris et al, “Surrogates Based Multi-Criteria Predesign Methodology of Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Cores - Application to CFV-like cores,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 305, pp. 314–333, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Reynoso-Meza, et al, “Physical programming for preference driven evolutionary multiobjective optimization,” Applied Soft Computing, 24, pp. 341–362, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Andersson, “A survey of multiobjective optimization in engineering design,” Tech. Rep. LiTH-IKP-R-1097, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linkoping University, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  5. D.E. Goldberg. 1989. “Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning,” 1st. ed. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., USA. [Google Scholar]
  6. “Nuclear Metal Fuel: Characteristics, Design, Manufacturing, Testing, and Operating History,” White Paper 18-01, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. B.M. Adams, et al, “Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.10 User’s Manual,” Sandia Technical Report SAND2014-4253, May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Messac, “Physical programming-effective optimization for computational design.” AIAA journal 34.1 (1996): 149-158. [Google Scholar]
  9. C.J. Werner, et al., “MCNP6.2 Release Notes”, Los Alamos National Laboratory, report LA-UR-18-20808 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Stewart, “FRIDGe: Fast Reactor Input Deck Generator,” Journal of Open Source Software, 4(40), 1486, [Google Scholar]
  11. M. B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Oblozinsky, et al, “ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: Cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data”, Nuclear Data Sheets, 112(12):2887-2996 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. The HDF Group. “Hierarchical Data Format, version 5,” [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Stewart, (2019). Sodium Fast Reactor Database (Version v0.1) [Data set]. Zenodo. [Google Scholar]
  14. W. McKinney. “Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python”, Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, 51-56 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Jones, E. Oliphant, P. Peterson, et al, “SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python”, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Touran, “physprog”, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Stewart and T.S. Palmer, “Geometric Design Space for Sodium Fast Reactors,” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Washington, D.C., November 17-21, Vol. 121, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Stewart and T.S. Palmer, “Metallic Fuel Design Space for Sodium Fast Reactors,” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Orlando, Florida, November 11-15, Vol. 119, (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.