Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 10019 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Verification & Validation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124710019 | |
| Published online | 22 February 2021 | |
- OECD-NEA, “SFCOMPO 2.0. Database of Measured Isotopic Concentrations of Spent Nuclear Fuel, with Operational Histories and Design Data,” https://www.oecd-nea.org/sfcompo/ (2017). [Google Scholar]
- F. Michel-Sendis et al., “SFCOMPO-2.0: An OECD NEA Database of Spent Nuclear Fuel Isotopic Assays, Reactor Design Specifications, and Operating Data,” Annals of Nuclear Energy 110, pp. 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.07.022 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- S. Tsuda et al., “Status of the NEA International Activities on Nuclear Criticality Safety,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety (ICNC 2019), Paris, France (2019). [Google Scholar]
- OECD-NEA, “International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation (IRPhE) Project” https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wprs/irphe/ (2019) [Google Scholar]
- J.D. Bess, T. Ivanova, I. Hill, and M.A. Marshall, “The 2018 Edition of the IRPhEP Handbook,” INL/CON-17-43940-Revision-0, Idaho National Laboratory https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1478327 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- J. B. Briggs, L. Scott, and A. Nouri, “The International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project,” Nuclear Science and Engineering 145(1), pp. 1–10 (2003). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE03-14 [Google Scholar]
- F. Michel-Sendis, I. Gauld, M. Bossant, and N. Soppera, “A New OECD/NEA Database of Nuclide Compositions of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR 2014), Kyoto, Japan (2014). [Google Scholar]
- I. Gauld, M.L. Williams, F. Michel-Sendis, and J.S. Martinez, “Integral Nuclear Data Validation Using Experimental Spent Nuclear Fuel Compositions,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology 49(6), pp. 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.07.002 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- D. Boulanger et al., “High Burnup PWR and BWR MOX Fuel Performance: A Review of Belgonucleaire Recent Experimental Programs,” CD, Proceedings of the 2004 International Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance, Orlando, Florida, USA (2004). [Google Scholar]
- R. Montgomery, R.N. Morris, B. Bevard, and J. Scaglione, “Key Results from Detailed Nondestructive Examinations of 25 Pressurized Water Reactor High Burnup Spent Nuclear Fuel Rods,” Nuclear Science and Engineering 193 (8), pp. 884–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1573602 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- NEA, “Spent Nuclear Fuel Assay Data for Isotopic Validation (State-of-the-Art Report),” NEA/NSC/WPNCS/DOV(2011)5 https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpncs/ADSNF/SOAR_final.pdf (2011). [Google Scholar]
- NEA, “Evaluation Guide for the Evaluated Spent Nuclear Fuel Assay Database (SFCOMPO),” NEA/NSC/R(2015)8, Nuclear Energy Agency. https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/docs/2015/nsc-r2015-8.pdf (2016). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.