Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 10028
Number of page(s) 12
Section Verification & Validation
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. W. Heeds et al., “The nuclear design of the MAPLE-X10 reactor” (INIS-XA-C--006). International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (1995) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Viktorov, “Recent experience in evaluation of safety margins of Canadian nuclear power plants”, IAEA-TECDOC--1418. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2004) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Salvatores, “Complementary role of critical integral experiment and power reactor start-up experiments for LMFBR neutronics data and method validation” (CEA-DRNR-P--353). France (1986) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. P. Wigner, “Effects of Small Perturbations on Pile Period,” CP-3048, Manhattan Project Report (1945). [Google Scholar]
  5. L.N. Usachev, Proc. of First U.N. Conf. on Peaceful Uses of At. Energy, Vol. 5, p. 503 (1955). [Google Scholar]
  6. L.N. Usachev and Y. Bobkov, “Planning on Optimum Set of Microscopic Experiments and Evaluations to Obtain a Given Accuracy in Reactor Parameter Calculations”, INDC CCP19U, IAEA Int. Nucl. Data Committee (1972) [Google Scholar]
  7. L.N. Usachev, “Can Experimental Scientists, Data Evaluators and Compilers, and Nuclear Data Users Understand One Another” INDC/166, (1967). Translated from Russian. [Google Scholar]
  8. BNL-52675, “A CSWEG Retrospective” 35th Anniversary Cross Section Working Group, Nov. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Wagner (Ed.) et al., “Evaluation and Processing of Covariance Data” Proceedings of A Specialists Meeting. NEA/NSC/DOC(93)3. (1993) [Google Scholar]
  10. B.L. Broadhead, “SCALE 5.1 Cross-Section Covariance Libraries” ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 5.1,Vol. I, Book 3, Sect. M19. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rochman, D., M. Herman, P. Oblozinsky, S.F. Mughabghab, “Preliminary Cross-section Covariances for WPEC Subgroup 26”, Technical Report BNL-77407-2007-IR, Brookhaven National Laboratory (2007). [Google Scholar]
  12. F.B. Brown “Recent Advances and Future Prospects for Monte Carlo”, LA-UR-10-06873, Super computing in Nuclear Applications & MonteCarlo2010, Tokyo, Japan (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Smith “Monte Carlo for Practical LWR Analysis: what’s needed to get to the goal?,” presented at the M&C Division Computational Roundtable, American Nuclear Society Summer Meeting, Hollywood, FL (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. D.A. Brown et al. “ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data”, Nuclear Data Sheets, Volume 148, 2018, Pages 1-142, ISSN 0090-3752, [Google Scholar]
  15. S.C. van der Marck, “Benchmarking ENDF/B-VII.1, JENDL-4.0, and JEFF-3.1” Proc. ANS Annual meeting, PHYSOR, Knoxville, TN, USA (2012) [Google Scholar]
  16. NEA (2019), “ICSBEP Handbook 2018”, International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook, [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Bernstein et al. “Final Report for the Workshop for Applied Nuclear Data Activities”, LLNL-PROC-769849, Jan 22-24, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. NEA Nuclear Data High Priority Request List, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. NEA JEFF Stakeholder Workshop. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. NEA, International Co-operation in Nuclear Data Evaluation: An Extended Summary of the Collaborative International Evaluated Library Organisation (CIELO) Pilot Project (2019), [Google Scholar]
  21. WPEC SG46 “Efficient and Effective Use of Integral Experiments for Nuclear Data Validation” (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. WPEC SG26 “Uncertainty and target accuracy assessment for innovative systems using recent covariance data evaluations.” (2008) [Google Scholar]
  23. NEA, “IRPhE Handbook 2018”, International Reactor Physics Evaluation Project Handbook, [Google Scholar]
  24. Hill, Ian, Soppera, N., Bossant, M. “IDAT: The International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments Database and Analysis Tool.” Nuclear Science and Engineering. 178. 280-294. 10.13182/NSE14-37 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Palmiotti and M. Salvatores “PIA and REWIND: Two new methodologies for cross section adjustment,” MC2017, Jeju, Korea, April 16-20 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Dyrda, I. Hill, L. Fiorito, O. Cabellos, N. Soppera, “A comparison of uncertainty propagation techniques using NDaST: full, half or zero Monte Carlo?” EPJ Nuclear Sciences and Technologies, 141-148. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Popov, S. Doerffer, R. Ion, J. Hopwood “ACR-1000TM Project - Licensing Opportunities and Challenges” International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2011) [Google Scholar]
  28. IRPHE/B&W-SS-LATTICE, Spectral Shift Reactor Lattice Experiments, NEA Databank package 1687. [Google Scholar]
  29. IRPhE-TAPIRO-ARCHIVE, Fast neutron source reactor primary documents, reactor physics experiments, NEA Databank package 1764. [Google Scholar]
  30. I. Gauld, N. Sly, F. Michel-Sendis “OECD NEA benchmark database of spent nuclear fuel isotopic compositions for world reactor designs” PHYSOR2014, Kyoto, Japan (2014) [Google Scholar]
  31. IRPhE/STEK, Reactor Physics Experiments from Fast-Thermal Coupled Facility, NEA Databank package 1714. [Google Scholar]
  32. Montgomery, C. R.; Norberg, J. A. & Wilson, T. R. “Summary of the Spert-I, -II, and -III reactor facilities”, November 1, 1957 [Google Scholar]
  33. IRPhE/BERENICE, effective delayed neutron fraction measurements, NEA Databank package 1759. [Google Scholar]
  34. S. van der Marck, R. Klein, A. Hogenbirk, A. Koning, Benchmark Results for Delayed Neutron Data. AIP Conference Proceedings (2005). 769. 10.1063/1.1945064. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.