Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 250, 2021
DYMAT 2021 - 13th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 10
Section Modelling & Numerical Simulation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125002005
Published online 09 September 2021
  1. H. Jiang, H. Ziegler, Z. Zhang, H. Meng, D. Chronopoulos, and Y. Chen, “Mechanical properties of 3D printed architected polymer foams under large deformation”, Mater. Des., vol. 194, p. 108946, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108946. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. L. Lu, M. Qian, H. P. Tang, M. Yan, J. Wang, and D. H. StJohn, “Massive transformation in Ti-6Al-4V additively manufactured by selective electron beam melting”, Acta Mater., vol. 104, pp. 303–311, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.011. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Tancogne-Dejean, X. Li, M. Diamantopoulou, C. C. Roth, and D. Mohr, “High Strain Rate Response of Additively-Manufactured Plate-Lattices: Experiments and Modeling”, J. Dyn. Behav. Mater., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 361–375, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40870-019-00219-6. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Bonatti and D. Mohr, “Mechanical performance of additively-manufactured anisotropic and isotropic smooth shell-lattice materials: Simulations & experiments”, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 122, pp. 1–26, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.022. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. W. Abueidda, A. S. Dalaq, R. K. Abu Al-Rub, and H. A. Younes, “Finite element predictions of effective multifunctional properties of interpenetrating phase composites with novel triply periodic solid shell architectured reinforcements”, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 92, pp. 80–89, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.12.004. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. S. Dalaq, D. W. Abueidda, R. K. Abu Al-Rub, and I. M. Jasiuk, “Finite element prediction of effective elastic properties of interpenetrating phase composites with architectured 3D sheet reinforcements”, Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 83, pp. 169–182, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.01.011. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. S. Dalaq, D. W. Abueidda, and R. K. Abu Al-Rub, “Mechanical properties of 3D printed interpenetrating phase composites with novel architectured 3D solidsheet reinforcements”, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 84, pp. 266–280, May 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.009. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. W. Lee, K. A. Khan, and R. K. Abu Al-Rub, “Stiffness and yield strength of architectured foams based on the Schwarz Primitive triply periodic minimal surface”, Int. J. Plast., vol. 95, pp. 1–20, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Al-Ketan, R. Rowshan, and R. K. Abu Al-Rub, “Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials”, Addit. Manuf., vol. 19, pp. 167–183, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006. [Google Scholar]
  10. F. S. L. Bobbert et al., “Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: A unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties”, Acta Biomater., vol. 53, pp. 572–584, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Al-Ketan, R. Rowshan, A. N. Palazotto, and R. K. Abu Al-Rub, “On Mechanical Properties of Cellular Steel Solids with Shell-Like Periodic Architectures Fabricated by Selective Laser Sintering”, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.1115/1.4041874. [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Novak et al., “Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviour of sheet TPMS cellular structures”, Compos. Struct., vol. 266, no. September 2020, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113801. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Kuhn and D. Medlin, Eds., Mechanical Testing and Evaluation. ASM International, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Chen and B. Song, Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. A. Kariem et al., “Round-Robin test of split Hopkinson pressure bar”, Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 126, pp. 62–75, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.12.003. [Google Scholar]
  16. ASTM E8, “ASTM E8/E8M standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials 1”, Annu. B. ASTM Stand. 4, no. C, pp. 1–27, 2010, doi: 10.1520/E0008. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.