EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 250, 2021DYMAT 2021 - 13th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading
|Number of page(s)||7|
|Section||Modelling & Numerical Simulation|
|Published online||09 September 2021|
- C. Siviour, P. Laity, W. Proud, J. Field, D. Porter, P. Church, P. Gould, and W. Huntingdon-Thresher, High Strain Rate Properties of a Polymer-Bonded Sugar: Their Dependence on Applied and Internal Constraints, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 464, 1229 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- P. J. Rae and D. M. Dattelbaum, The Properties of Poly(Tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) in Compression, Polymer. 45, 7615 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. N. Brown, P. J. Rae, and E. B. Orler, The Influence of Temperature and Strain Rate on the Constitutive and Damage Responses of Polychlorotrifluoroethylene (PCTFE, Kel-F 81), Polymer. 47, 7506 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. R. Trivedi and C. R. Siviour, A Simple Rate–Temperature Dependent Hyperelastic Model Applied to Neoprene Rubber, J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. 6, 336 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- A. R. Trivedi and C. R. Siviour, A Novel Methodology for Predicting the High Rate Mechanical Response of Polymers from Low Rate Data: Application to (Plasticised) Poly(Vinyl Chloride), Mech. Time-Dependent Mater. 1 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- D. M. Williamson, C. R. Siviour, W. G. Proud, S. J. P. Palmer, R. Govier, K. Ellis, P. Blackwell, and C. Leppard, Temperature–Time Response of a Polymer Bonded Explosive in Compression (EDC37), J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 41, 085404 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- D. R. Drodge, D. M. Williamson, S. J. P. Palmer, W. G. Proud, and R. K. Govier, The Mechanical Response of a PBX and Binder: Combining Results across the Strain-Rate and Frequency Domains, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 43, (2010). [Google Scholar]
- H. Kolsky, An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at Very High Rates of Loading, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. B 62, 676 (1949). [Google Scholar]
- G. T. (Rusty) Gray III and W. R. Blumenthal, Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing of Soft Materials, ASM Handbook Volume 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation (ASM International) (2000). [Google Scholar]
- W. Chen, B. Zhang, and M. J. Forrestal, A Split Hopkinson Bar Technique for Low Impedance Materials, Exp. Mech. 39, 81 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- M. J. Kendall, D. R. Drodge, R. F. Froud, and C. R. Siviour, Stress Gage System for Measuring Very Soft Materials under High Rates of Deformation, Meas. Sci. Technol. 25, 075603 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- F. Pierron and M. Grédiac, Towards Material Testing 2.0. A Review of Test Design for Identification of Constitutive Parameters from Full-Field Measurements, Strain 57, 12370 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- M. J. Kendall and C. R. Siviour, Experimentally Simulating Adiabatic Conditions: Approximating High Rate Polymer Behavior Using Low Rate Experiments with Temperature Profiles, Polym. (United Kingdom) 54, 5058 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- M. J. Kendall and C. R. Siviour, Experimentally Simulating High Rate Composite Deformation in Tension and Compression: Polymer Bonded Explosive Simulant, J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. 1, 114 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- MRPRA, Natural Rubber Engineering Data Sheet EDS 19, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- W. P. Cox and E. H. Merz, Correlation of Dynamic and Steady Flow Viscosities, J. Polym. Sci. 28, 619 (1958). [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Gorham, The Effect of Specimen Dimensions on High Strain Rate Compression Measurements of Copper, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 24, 1489 (1991). [Google Scholar]
- R. Cornish, D. Porter, P. Church, P. Gould, T. Andrews, B. Proud, D. Drodge, and C. Siviour, Comparison of Porter-Gould Constitutive Model with Compression Test Data for HTPB/SUGAR, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 955 (2007), pp. 777–780. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.