EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 288 (2023) EPJ Web Conf., 288 (2023) 10003 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 288, 2023
ANIMMA 2023 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 10003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Current Trends in Development Radiation Detectors
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328810003
Published online 21 November 2023
  1. R. W. Todd, J. M. Nightingale, and D. B. Everett, ―A proposed γ camera‖, Nature 251, 132–134, (1974). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Jan, G. Santin, D. Strul, S. Staelens, K. Assié, et al., ―GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT, ‖ Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 49, no. 19, pp. 4543–4561, (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. R. Cherry, T. Jones, J. S. Karp, J. Qi, W. W. Moses, and R. D. Badawi, ―Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care‖, J. Nucl. Med., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Moskal, K. Dulski, N. Chug, et al., ―Positronium imaging with the novel multiphoton PET scanner‖, Sci. Adv. 2021; 7: eabh4394. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Tanimori, Y. Mizumura, A. Takada, et al., “Establishment of Imaging Spectroscopy of Nuclear Gamma-Rays based on Geometrical Optics‖, Sci. Rep. 7 41511 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. K. Leung, M. S. Judenhofer, S. R. Cherry, and R. D. Badawi, ―Performance assessment of a software-based coincidence processor for the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner‖, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 63, no. 18, p. 18NT01, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Terry Jones and David Townsend, ―History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography‖, Journal of Medical Imaging, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 011-013, Mar. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. A. Mullani, J. Gaeta, K. Yerian, W. H. Wong, R. K. Hartz, et al., “Dynamic Imaging with High Resolution Time-of-Flight PET Camera-TOFPET I”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 31, 1, 609-613 (1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Moskal, D. Kisielewska, C. Curceanu, E. Czerwiński, K. Dulski, A. Gajos, et al., ―Feasibility study of the positronium imaging with the J-PET tomograph‖, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 64 no. 5, 055017 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. G. S. Li, C. Lizarazo, J. Gerl, I. Kojouharov, H. Schaffner, M. Górska, N. Pietralla, S. Saha, M. L. Liu, and J. G. Wang, ―Simulated characteristics of the DEGAS γ-detector array‖, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 890 (2018) 148-154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Rudigier, Zs. Podolyák, P. H. Regan, A. M. Bruce, S. Lalkovski, R. L. Canavan, E. R. Gamba, O. Roberts, I. Burrows, D. M. Cullen, L. M. Fraile, L. Gerhard, J. Gerl, M. Gorska, A. Grant, J. Jolie, V. Karayonchev, N. Kurz, W. Korten, I.H. Lazarus, C. R. Nita, V. F. E. Pucknell, J.-M. Régis, H. Schaffner, J. Simpson, P. Singh, C. M. Townsley, J. F. Smith, and J. Vesic, ―FATIMA — FAst TIMing Array for DESPEC at FAIR‖, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 969 (2020) 163967. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Akkoyun, et al., ―AGATA—Advanced GAmma Tracking Array‖, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 668, 26 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Simpson, ―The Euroball Spectrometer‖, Z. Phys. A 358, 139 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Y. Lee, ―The GAMMASPHERE‖, Nucl. Phys. A 520, 641 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Palit, ―Recent results from digital INGA at BARC–TIFR Pelletron Linac Facility and future plans‖, Pramana 83, 719-728 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Y. Lee and J. Simpson, ―AGATA and GRETA: The Future of Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy‖, Nucl. Phys. News Intl. 20, 23-28 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Eberth, et al., ―MINIBALL: A Ge detector array for radioactive ion beam facilities‖, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46, 389 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Ródenas, A. Pascual, I. Zarza, V. Serradell, Josefina Ortiz, and L. Ballesteros, ―Analysis of the influence of germanium dead layer on detector calibration simulation for environmental radioactive samples using the Monte Carlo method‖, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 496 (2003) 390–399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Elanique, O. Marzocchi, D. Leone, L. Hegenbart, B. Breustedt, and L. Oufni, ―Dead layer thickness characterization of an HPGe detector by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations‖, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 70 (2012) 538–542. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Andreotti, M. Hult, G. Marissens, G. Lutter, A. Garfagnini, S. Hemmer, K. von Sturm, ―Determination of dead-layer variation in HPGe detectors‖, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 87 (2014) 331–335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Truong Thi Hong Loan, Vu Ngoc Ba, Truong Huu Ngan Thy, Huynh Thi Yen Hong, Ngo Quang Huy, ―Determination of the dead-layer thickness for both pand n-type HPGe detectors using the two-line method‖, Journal of. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 315 (2018) 95–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mikael Hult, Stef Geelen, Mark Stals, Guillaume Lutter, Gerd Marissens, Heiko Stroh, Sonja Schreurs, Wouter Schroeyers, Michel Bruggeman, Leen Verheyen, ―Determination of homogeneity of the top surface deadlayer in an old HPGe detector‖, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 147 (2019) 182–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ren-Yuan Zhu, ―Radiation damage in scintillating crystals‖, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 413 (1998) 327-311. [Google Scholar]
  24. B. De Canditiis, G. Duchene, M. H. Sigward, M. Filliger, F. Didierjean, M. Ginsz, D. Ralet, ―Full-volume characterization of an AGATA segmented HPGe gamma-ray detector using a 152Eu source‖, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2021) 223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. F. C. L. Crespi, F. Camera, B. Million, M. Sassi, O. Wieland, A. Bracco, ―A novel technique for the characterization of a HPGe detector response based on pulse shape comparison‖, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 593 (2008) 440–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Lewandowski, P. Reiter, B. Birkenbach, B. Bruyneel, E. Clement, J. Eberth, H. Hess, C. Michelagnoli, R.M. Perez-Vidal, and M. Zielinska, ―Pulse-Shape Analysis and position resolution in highly segmented HPGe AGATA detectors‖, Eur. Phys. J. A (2019) 55: 81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. B. De Canditiisa, G. Duchêne, ―Simulations using the pulse shape comparison scanning technique on an AGATA segmented HPGe gamma-ray detector‖, Eur. Phys. J. A 56 (2020) 276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Biswajit Das, R. Palit, R. Donthi, A. Kundu, Md. S. R. Laskar, P. Dey, D. Negi, F. S. Babra, S. Jadhav, B. S. Naidu, and A. T. Vazhappilly, ―Development of a position-sensitive fast scintillator (LaBr3(Ce)) detector setup for gamma-ray imaging application‖, EPJ Web Conf. 253 (2021) 11005. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Biswajit Das, A. Kundu, R. Palit, V. Malik, P. Dey, D. Negi, S.K. Jadhav, A. T. Vazhappilly, and B. S. Naidu, ―Development of a GAGG(Ce)-based compact 3D scanning setup for assessment of active volume in γ-ray detectors‖, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1048 (2023) 167928. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. NNDC, 2022, http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2. [Google Scholar]
  31. TIFR homepage URL http://www.tifr.res.in/~pell/lamps.html. [Google Scholar]
  32. Root-CERN homepage URL https://root.cern/. [Google Scholar]
  33. Geant4-CERN homepage URL https://geant4.web.cern.ch/. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.