Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 325, 2025
International Conference on Advanced Physics for Sustainable Future: Innovations and Solutions (IEMPHYS-24)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532501010
Published online 05 May 2025
  1. H. A. Bethe (1939) Energy production in stars. Phys. Rev. 55 103. [Google Scholar]
  2. E.M. Burbidge, G.R. Burbidge, W.A. Fowler, F. Hoyle (1957) Synthesis of the elements in stars. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 547–650 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Kocak, E. Pasayigit and S. Akkkoyun, Phys. Scr. 98 (2023) 105005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kusakabe M, Kajino T, Boyd RN, Yoshida T and Mathews GJ 2007 Phys. Rev.D 76 121302 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Spergel D.N. et. al., (WMAP) 2007 Astrophys. J. Suppl. 170 377 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clayton, D. D.; Fowler, W. A.; Hull, T. E.; Zimmerman, B. A. (1961). Annals of Physics. 12 (3): 331–408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Seeger, P. A.; Fowler, W. A.; Clayton, D. D. (1965). The Astro. J. of Supplement Series 11: 121–126 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Reifarth, et. al. (2018) Neutron-induced cross sections. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Alvarez-Ruso, et. al. (2018) NuSTEC1 White Paper: Status and challenges of neutrino–nucleus scattering. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100 1–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. F.-K. Thielemann, M. Eichler, I.V. Panov, B. Wehmeyer (2017) Neutron star mergers and nucleosynthesis of heavy elements. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 67 253–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Wiescher, F. Käppeler, K. Langanke (2012) Critical reactions in contemporary nuclear astrophysics. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50 165–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Broggini, D. Bemmerer, A. Guglielmetti, R. Menegazzo (2010) LUNA: Nuclear astrophysics deep underground. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 53–73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Baur, C.A. Bertulani, H. Rebel (1986) Coulomb dissociation as a source of information on radiative capture processes of astrophysical interest. Nucl.Phys. A 458 188–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Spitaleri, M. La Cognata, L. Lamia, R.G. Pizzone, A. Tumino (2019) Astrophysics studies with the trojan horse method. Eur. Phys. J. A 55 161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Tumino, et. al.(2013) New advances in the trojan horse method as an indirect approach to nuclear astrophysics. Few Body Syst. 54 745–753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.M. Mukhamedzhanov, C.A. Gagliardi, R.E. Tribble (2001) Asymptotic normalization coefficients, spectroscopic factors, and direct radiative capture rates. Phys. Rev. C 63 024612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. X.Z. Li, FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 41, JAN 2002 [Google Scholar]
  18. X.Z. Li. et al., Fusion Eng. And Degn. 81 (2006) 1517–1520 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D.L. Book, NRL Plasma Formulary, Revised 1980, p. 44 [Google Scholar]
  20. X.Z. Li, Q.M. Wei and B. Liu, Nucl. Fusion 48 (2008) 125003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C.L. Liang, Z.M. Dong and X.Z. Li, CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 108, NO. 4 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. Md. A. Khan, S.H. Mondal M. Alam and M. Hasan, Bul. J. of Phys. Vol. 50 (2023) 354366 [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Rolfs, Prog. In Part. And Nucl. Phys. 59 (2007) 43–50 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 69, no. 26 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Spillane, F. Raiola, C. Rolfs, D. Schurmann, F. Strieder, S. Zeng, H.W. Becker, C. Bordeanu, L. Gialanella, M. Romania and J. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRL 98, 122501 (2007) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Xu et al., NACRE II: an update of the NACRE compilation of charged-particleinduced thermonuclear reaction rates for nuclei with mass number A<16, Nuclear Physics A (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. M.I. Hussein, R. H. Abdullah, ISCPS-2020, J. Phys., Conference Series, 1660 (2020) 012102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. W.A. Fowler, G.R. Caughlan, and B.A. Zimmerman, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 13, 69 (1975) [Google Scholar]
  29. A. V. Afanasjev, M. Beard, A. I. Chugunov, M. Wiescher, and D. G. Yakovlev, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054625, (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. R. S. Canon, et al, Phys. Rev. C, VOLUME 65, 044008 [Google Scholar]
  31. Yusuf Sert, Journal of Science and Technology, 2021, 14(1), 241–248 [Google Scholar]
  32. Satchler, G, (1983). Int. series of monographs on Physics: Oxford University Press, Direct Nuclear Reaction [Google Scholar]
  33. Z. Gao-Long et al., High energy Phys. and Nucl. Phys., Vol. 31, No 7 Jul (2007) [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Sadeghi and R. Ghasemi, J. of the Korean Phys. Society, Vol. 64, No. 11, pp. 16541657 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. E. Yildiz and I. H. Sarpun, A-Applied sci. Eng., 2020, 21(1), pp. 205–209 [Google Scholar]
  36. G. Kocak, E. Pasayigit and S. Akkoyun, Phys. Scr. 98 (2023) 105005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.