EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 328 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 328 (2025) 01070 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2025
First International Conference on Engineering and Technology for a Sustainable Future (ICETSF-2025)
Article Number 01070
Number of page(s) 18
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532801070
Published online 18 June 2025
  1. Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020). Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 14. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. (2018). Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. WHO. [Google Scholar]
  3. Box, G.E.P., & Jenkins, G.M. (1976). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day. [Google Scholar]
  4. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep Learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. doi:10.1038/nature14539 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press. Available at: https ://www. deeplearningbook. org/ [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785-794). doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 [Google Scholar]
  8. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1929-1958. [Google Scholar]
  9. Friedman, J.H. (2001). Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K.Q. (2018). Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4700-4708). DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Q., & Zhao, D. (2019). Short-Term Air Quality Prediction Using LSTM Neural Networks. IEEE Access, 7, 133293-133302. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932984 [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, L., & Ding, R. (2023). Deep Learning Based Multimodal Urban Air Quality Prediction and Its Spatiotemporal Correlation Analysis. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49296-7 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, Y., et. al. (2019). Deep Learning Approaches for Air Quality Prediction. AI & Society. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, X., & Zhao, L. (2020). Comparative Study of Regression Models for AQI Forecasting. Environmental Modelling. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fang, C., et. al. (2019). An Explainable AI Approach for Air Quality Forecasting. Environmental Modelling & Software, 119, 103-112. [Google Scholar]
  16. Iqbal, A., Sarkar, P., & Mukherjee, N. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for AQI Prediction in Indian Metro Cities. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 13(12), IJERTV13IS120014. doi:10.17577/IJERTV13IS120014 [Google Scholar]
  17. Rahman, M.M., Hussain, M.E., Nayeem, M.S., Tanha, K.A., Alam, M.S., Uddin, K.M.M., & Babu, H.M.H. (2024). AirNet: Predictive Machine Learning Model for Air Quality Forecasting Using Web Interface. Environmental Systems Research, 13, Article 44. doi:10.1186/s40068-024-00378-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ahmad, S., & Ahmad, T. (2023). AQI Prediction Using Layer Recurrent Neural Network Model: A New Approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195, Article 1180. doi:10.1007/s10661-023-11646-3 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ioannou, I., Nagaradjane, P., Khalifeh, A., Vassiliou, V., et. al. (2025). An Accurate Two-Stage Deep Machine Learning Aided Air Quality Estimation Based on Multiple Gases from Aerial Images. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. doi:10.1007/s11869-025-01710-x [Google Scholar]
  20. Pande, C.B.P., Radhadevi, L., & Satyanarayana, M.B. (2024). Evaluation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Daily Air Quality Index Prediction in Delhi City, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196, Article 1215. doi:10.1007/s10661-024-13351-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liao, Q., Zhu, M., Wu, L., Pan, X., Tang, X., & Wang, Z. (2020). Deep Learning for Air Quality Forecasts: A Review. Current Pollution Reports, 6, 399-409. doi:10.1007/s40726-020-00159-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhan, C., Jiang, W., Lin, F., Zhang, S., & Li, B. (2022). A Decomposition-Ensemble Broad Learning System for AQI Forecasting. Neural Computing and Applications, 34, 18461-18472. doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07448-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, Z., Zhao, W., & Lv, Y. (2022). An Ensemble LSTM-Based AQI Forecasting Model with Decomposition-Reconstruction Technique via CEEMDAN and Fuzzy Entropy. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 15, 2299-2311. doi:10.1007/s11869-022-01252-6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar, S., Mishra, A., Pandey, H.K., Tiwari, U.K., & Harnisha, M. (2025). Air Quality Prediction Using Ensemble Learning. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS, Volume 2317, pp. 60-72). doi:10.1007/978-3-031-79041-65 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sachdeva, S., Kaur, R., Kimmi, H., Singh, K., Aggarwal, K., & Kharb, S. (2024). Meteorological AQI and Pollutants Concentration-Based AQI Predictor. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21, 4979-4996. doi:10.1007/s13762-023-05307-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ansari, A., & Quaff, A.R. (2025). Data-Driven Analysis and Predictive Modelling of Hourly Air Quality Index (AQI) Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Case Study of Azamgarh, India. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 156, Article 74. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-024-05304-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, Q., Cui, B., & Liu, Z. (2024). Air Quality Class Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods Based on Monitoring Data and Secondary Modeling. Atmosphere, 15(5), 553. doi:10.3390/atmos1505 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.