EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 344 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 344 (2025) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 344, 2025
AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering Conference (AIPTEC 2025)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 10
Section AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534401004
Published online 22 December 2025
  1. L. Carvalho, D. Almeida, A. Loures, P. Ferreira, and F. Rebola, Quality Education for All: A Fuzzy Set Analysis of Sustainable Development Goal Compliance. 16, (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125218 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Adipat and R. Chotikapanich, Sustainable Development Goal 4: An Education Goal to Achieve Equitable Quality Education. 11, (2022). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0159 [Google Scholar]
  3. E. G. A. Tolba and A. M. Al-Osaimi, The Effectiveness of Using the Model-Based Thinking Strategy in Developing First-Grade High School Students’ Physical Concepts and Inquiry Thinking Skills. 19, (2023). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13111 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. V. Bramasta and H. Hidayati, Analysis of Scientific Literacy Availability in Physics Worksheets for Grade XI in Senior High Schools in Padang City. 1, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i4.107 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Khrennikov, Bild Conception of Scientific Theory Structuring in Classical and Quantum Physics: From Hertz and Boltzmann to Schrödinger and De Broglie. 25, 11565 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/e25111565 [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Zhi and Z. Gao, Research on the Evaluation of the Effect of Moraleducation Integration in College Students Physicaleducation Classroom Based on Behavioral Perceptionmodel. (2025). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7315654/v1 [Google Scholar]
  7. E. O. Adu and O. Olaoye, An Investigation Into Some Lexical Ambiguities in Algebra: South African Experience. 5, 20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p1243 [Google Scholar]
  8. K. G. Ambady, M. Ajmal, and P. Sukumaran, Effects of Response Cards Intervention on Academic Engagement and Achievement in Students With Intellectual Disabilities During Inclusive Elementary Mathematics Instruction. (2025). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs- 6338352/v1 [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Koparan and F. Rodríguez-Alveal, Probabilistic Thinking in Prospective Teachers From the Use of TinkerPlots for Simulation: Hat Problem. (2022). https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202217461 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. E. Forsström and O. T. Kaufmann A literature review exploring the use of programming in mathematics education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 17, 18–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.12.2 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Seebut, P. Wongsason, D. Kim, T. Putjuso, and C. Boonpok, Python-based simulations of the probabilistic behavior of random events for secondary school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 18, (2022). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12309 [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Koparan, How Does Simulation Contribute to Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Learning Experiences and Results?. Educ Sci (Basel). 12, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090624 [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Retnawati, Learning trajectory of item response theory course using multiple softwares. Olympiads in Informatics, Vilnius University. 1, 123–142 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15388/ioi.2017.10 [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Iskrenovic-Momcilovic, Improving Geometry Teaching with Scratch. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 15, (2020). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7807 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Maloney, M. Resnick, N. Rusk, B. Silverman, and E. Eastmond, The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 10, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. M. Al-Otaibi, Y. Clinics, H. M. Al-Otaibi, and T. M. A. Farghal, The Effect of Teaching Mathematics Using Scratch Software on the Achievement of 6th grade students in Kuwait. Migration Letters. 20, S1, 288–304 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Patkin, The interplay of language and mathematics. Pythagoras. 32, (2011). https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v32i2.15 [Google Scholar]
  18. B. S. Maulana and S. B. Waluya, Systematic Review tentang Berpikir Komputasional dengan Scratch dalam Pendidikan Selama 2018–2023. Seminar Nasional Matematika. 7, 328–334 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Mardiani, S. Mokodenseho, T. F. Matiala, S. S. A. Limbalo, and N. Y. Mokodompit, Implementation of Digital Science and Literacy Teaching in Developing Science Literacy in Middle School Students in Indonesia. (2024). https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v2i01.228 [Google Scholar]
  20. U. WW, S. Slamin, and D. Dafik, The Development of RBL-STEM Learning Materials to Promote the Students Analytical Thinking Skills in Solving Convolutional Neural Network Problems. (2024). https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0099. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. R. Ahmad, D. F. Ali, N. F. Othman, N. F. Jumaat, N. A. Wahab, and R. S. Sundari Systematic Review of Web-Based Learning in Enhancing Visualization Skill. (2024). https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.50.2.119142 [Google Scholar]
  22. J. E. Relyea and H. Hwang, Transactional Development of Science and Mathematics Knowledge and Reading Proficiency for Multilingual Students Across Languages of Instruction. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001858 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Alhamami, Instructional Communication and Medium of Instruction: Content Instructors’ Perspectives. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231172713 [Google Scholar]
  24. P. N. Iwuanyanwu, Addressing Common Deficiencies of Mathematics Skills Among Chemistry Student Teachers. (2021). https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v17i1.1. [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Hiebert and D. A. Grouws, The Effects of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students’ Learning. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. 2, 371–404 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Killpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell, Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Kunter, U. Klusmann, J. Baumert, D. Richter, T. Voss, and A. Hachfeld, Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. J Educ Psychol. 105, 805–820 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583 [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Loewenberg Ball, M. H. Thames, and G. Phelps, Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. J Teach Educ. 59, 389–407 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Baumert et al,Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. Am Educ Res J. 47, 133–180 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157 [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Kholifah, S. B. Waluya, and I. Kharisudin, Student’s Mathematics Communication Skill by Reading Comprehension Skill on Solving Word Problem. AIP Conf Proc. 080005, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133790 [Google Scholar]
  31. R. M. Zbiek, M. K. Heid, G. W. Blume, and T. P. Dick, Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. 2, 1169–1207 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Ligozat and Y. Buyck, Comparative Didactics: Toward a Generic Model for Analyzing Content- Specific Dimensions of Teaching Quality. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041241257282 [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Brousseau, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Springer Dordrecht. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2 [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Chevallard and M. Bosch, Didactic Transposition in Mathematics Education. (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_48. [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Artigue, Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 7, 245–274 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022103903080. [Google Scholar]
  36. J.-B. Lagrange, M. Artigue, C. Laborde, and L. Trouche, Technology and Mathematics Education: A Multidimensional Study of the Evolution of Research and Innovation. Technologuyand Mathematics Education. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_9. [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Benton, C. Hoyles, I. Kalas, and R. Noss, Bridging Primary Programming and Mathematics: Some Findings of Design Research in England. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. 3, 115–138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751- 017-0028-x. [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Calder, Using Scratch: An integrated problem- solving approach to mathematical thinking. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom. 15, 9–14 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  39. L. C. Zhang and J. Nouri, A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Comput Educ. 141, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607 [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Pratt, Making sense of the total of two dice. J Res Math Educ. 31, 602–625 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/749889. [Google Scholar]
  41. C. Konold et al, TinkerPlots Workshop Guide. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Yadav, H. Hong, and C. Stephenson, Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends. 60, 565–568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7. [Google Scholar]
  43. UNESCO, Education For Sustainable Development Goals. France. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Grover and R. Pea, Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher. 42, 38–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051 [Google Scholar]
  45. P21, Partnership for 21st Century Learning A Network of Battelle For Kids Frameworks for 21st Century Learning Definitions. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  46. N. A. H. Hanafiah, Integrating Service Learning in Higher Education for Enhanced Environmental Consciousness in Yan, Kedah. (2024). https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2024.20.2.2 [Google Scholar]
  47. T. Nurul Izza, Sugiman, and S. Kholifah, Digital Didactical Design: Scratch Assisted Learning of Probability Materials in Junior High School. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 11, 277–290 (2024). https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i12.6505 [Google Scholar]
  48. M. Akram, Z. Kamran, and M. I. Malik, Maximizing Subject Matter Knowledge of Science Teachers Through Professional Development Plan and Training. (2024). https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-i)07 [Google Scholar]
  49. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (2018). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237 [Google Scholar]
  50. M. Laurent et al,Impact of a programming activity impact of programming on primary mathematics learning. Learn Instr. 82, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101667 [Google Scholar]
  51. R. García-Perales and A. Palomares-Ruiz, Education in programming and mathematical learning: Functionality of a programming language in educational processes. Sustainability (Switzerland). 12, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310129 [Google Scholar]
  52. L. Benton, P. Saunders, I. Kalas, C. Hoyles, and R. Noss, Designing for learning mathematics through programming: A case study of pupils engaging with place value. Int J Child Comput Interact. 16, 68–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  53. N. C. Obiuto, W. Ebirim, N. Ninduwezuor-Ehiobu, E. C. Ani, K. A. Olu-lawal, and E. D. Ugwuanyi, Integrating Sustainability Into HVAC Project Management: Challenges and Opportunities. (2024). https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i3.943 [Google Scholar]
  54. H. Wang and M. Liu, Methods and Content Innovation Strategies of Digital Education in Higher Vocational Colleges Under the Background of Artificial Intelligence. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251321337 [Google Scholar]
  55. M. U. Shahzad, Core Competencies for Digital Leadership Development: A Perspective From the Lens of Paradox Theory. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/bl-10-2023-0278 [Google Scholar]
  56. A.-R. Smolander and S. R. Yusof, Innovative ICT Education in Early Childhood: Building Young Talents for the Digital World. (2023). https://doi.org/10.37698/jels.v2i1.194 [Google Scholar]
  57. S. Siswadi, T. Tiwan, and A. Dharin, Project Based Learning (PjBL) for Improving Elementary School Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Banyumas Regency, Indonesia. (2024). https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.691 [Google Scholar]
  58. K. C. Li and B. T. M. Wong, The Opportunities and Challenges of Social Media in Higher Education: A Literature Review. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00857-5 [Google Scholar]
  59. B. A. Serrano et al, The Role of FAIR Nanosafety Data and Nanoinformatics in Achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals: The NanoCommons Experience. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/d3su00148b [Google Scholar]
  60. C. N. Ugwu et al, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Resilient Healthcare Systems: Addressing Medicine and Public Health Challenges in Conflict Zones. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000041535 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.