Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2017
ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
Article Number 11029
Number of page(s) 4
Section Nuclear Reaction Measurements
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714611029
Published online 13 September 2017
  1. S.M. Qaim, F. Tárkányi, P. Obložinský et al., IAEA-TECDOC-1211, Vienna, 2001. Available from: http://www-nds.iaea.org/medical/ [Google Scholar]
  2. M.U. Khandaker, H. Haba, J. Kanaya, N. Otuka, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 296, 14 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.U. Khandaker, H. Haba, J. Kanaya, N. Otuka, H.A, Nuclear Data Sheets 119, 252 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M.U. Khandaker, H. Haba, J. Kanaya, N. Otuka, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 316, 33 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. M.U. Khandaker, H. Haba, N. Otuka N, A.R. Usman, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 335, 8-18 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C.F. Williamson, J.P. Boujot, J. Picard. Report CEAR 3042 (1966) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.U. Khandaker, K.S. Kim, M.W. Lee, K.-S. Kim, G.N. Kim, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 269, 1140 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M.U. Khandaker, M.S. Uddin, K.S. Kim, Y.S. Lee, G.N. Kim, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 262, 171 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. NuDat 2.6 software, Available from <http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/> [Google Scholar]
  10. Qtool: Calculation of Reaction Q-values and thresholds, Los Alamos National Laboratory, T-2 Nuclear Information Service, Available from: <http://t2.lanl.gov/nis/data/qtool.html> [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Otuka, E. Dupont, V. Semkova et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 272 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A.J. Koning, D. Rochman, TENDL data library. Available from: https://tendl.web.psi.ch/tendl_2015/deuteron_file/Al/027/residual/rp011024.tot [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Takacs, F. Szelecsenyi, F. Tarkanyi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Physics Res. B 174, 235 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Ochiai, M. Nakao, N. Kubota et al., Int. Conf. on Nucl. Data for Sci. and Technology, Nice 2, 1011 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Bém, E. Šimečková, M. Honusek et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 044610 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R.E. Batzel, W.W.T. Crane, G.D. Kelley, Phys. Rev. 91, 939–942 (1953) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H.F. Röhm, C.J. Verwey, J. Steyn, W.L. Rautenbach, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 31, 3345–3356 (1969) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. U. Martens, G.W. Schweimer, Z. Phys. 233, 170–177 (1970) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. I.A. Watson, S.L. Waters, D.K. Bewley, D.J. Silvester, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 106, 231–235 (1973) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Michel, G. Brinkmann, M. Galas, R. Stuck, Production of 24Na and 22Na by 2H-induced reactions on aluminium, personal communication (Michel), 1982 [Google Scholar]
  21. Tao Zhenlan, Zhu Fuying, Wang Gongqing, Canadi. Nucl. Technol. 2, 45 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao Wenrong, Lu. Hanlin, Yu Weixiang, Cheng Jiangtao, Chin. J. Nucl. Phys. 17, 160 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Hagiwara, T. Itoga, M. Baba et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 329–333, 218–222 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Nakao, J. Hori, K. Ochia et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 562, 785–788 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Hermanne, S. Takács, F. Tárkányi et al., Appl. Radiat. Isot. 70, 2763–2772 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. O. Lebeda, J. Štursa, J. Ráliš, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 360, 118–128 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. P.A. Lenk, R.J. Slobodrian, Phys. Rev. 116, 1229 (1959) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M.U. Khandaker, K.S. Kim, M.-W. Lee, K.-S. Kim, G.N. Kim, N. Otuka, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 271, 72 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  29. M.U. Khandaker, K. Kim, K.S. Kim, M.W. Lee, Y.S. Lee, G.N. Kim, Y.S. Cho, Y.O. Lee, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 267, 23 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. P.P. Dmitriev, N.N. Krasnov, G.A. Molin, (J, YK, 1982, (4/48), 38, 1982) Jour: Vop. At.Nauki i Tekhn., Ser. Yadernye Konstanty 1982(4/48), 38 (1982), Russia [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.