Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2020
ANIMMA 2019 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 7
Section Research Reactors
Published online 20 January 2020
  1. B. Michel, J. Sercombe, C. Nonon, F. Michel, and V. Marelle, “Simulation of Pellet-Cladding Interaction with the PLEIADES Fuel Performance Software Environment,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 182, pp. 124–137, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. V. D’Ambrosi, J. Gatt, F. Lebon, J. Julien, D. Parrat, and C. Destouches, in Proceedings of MECAMAT 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. P. Païdoussis, Fluid–Structure Interactions, Slender Structures and Axial Flow. ELSEVIER 2004, vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. P. Paidoussis, “Fluidelastic vibration of cylinder arrays in axial and cross flow: State of the art,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 329–360, 1981. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Axisa, Modélisation des systèmes mécaniques : Vibrations sous écoulements. Hermes, 2001, vol. 4. [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Ferrari, P. Balasubramanian, and al., “Non–linear vibrations of nuclear fuel rods,” Nuclear Engineering and Design. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Benhamadouche and al., “CFD estimation of the flow induced vibrations of fuel rod downstream a mixing grid,” proceeding of the ASME 2009 Pressure vessels and Piping division conference. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Park, H. Rhee, J.–K. Park, S.–Y. Jeon, and H.–K. Kim, “Indirect estimation method of the turbulence induced fluid force spectrum acting on a fuel rod,” vol. 239, no. 7, pp. 1237–1245. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Gradin and D. J. Rixen, Mechanical Vibrations, Theory and Application to Structural Dynamics., third edition ed. Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Alarcon, “Code aster: Modeling of damping in dynamics linear.” [Google Scholar]
  11. B. De Pauw, W. Weijtjens, S. Vanlanduit, K. Van Tichelen, and F. Berghmans, “Operational modal analysis of flow-induced vibration of nuclear fuel rods in a turbulent axial flow,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 284, pp. 19–26, Apr. 2015. [Online]. Available: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Wriggers, Computational Contact Mechanics, second edition ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York. [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Gonnier, J. Estrade, G. Bignan, and B. Maugard, in Proceedings of IGORR 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Alberman, M. Roche, P. Couffin, S. Bendotti, D. Moulin, and J. Boutfroy, “Technique for power ramp tests in the isabelle 1 loop of osiris reactor,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 293–303. [Google Scholar]
  15. J. K. Fink, “Thermophysical properties of uranium dioxide,” vol. 279, pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. M. Clinch, “Measurements of the wall pressure field at the surface of a smooth–walled pipe containing turbolent water flow,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 9, pp. 398–419, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Prakash, M. Thirumalai, M. Anandaraj, P. A. Kumar, D. Ramdasu, G. Pandey, G. Padmakumar, C. Anandbabu, and P. Kalyanasundaram, “Experimental qualification of subassembly design for prototype fast breeder reactor,” vol. 241, no. 8, pp. 3325–3332. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.