Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2022
XVth Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum Conference (ConfXV)
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 8
Section 3 - Parallel Track B
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202227403007
Published online 22 December 2022
  1. K. Ackerstaff et al. [OPAL], “Measurement of the strong coupling constant alpha(s) and the vector and axial vector spectral functions in hadronic tau decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C 7 (1999), 571–593 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Boito, M. Goltennan, M. Jamin, A. Mahdavi, K. Maltman, .J. Osborne and S. Peris, “An updated detennination of as from t decays,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012), 093015 [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Schael et al, [ALEPH], “Branching ratios and spectral functions of tau decays: Final ALEPH measurements and physics implications,” Phys. Rept. 421 (2005), 191–284 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Davier, S. Descotes-Genon, A. Hocker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, “The Detennination of alpha(s) from Tau Decays Revisited,” Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008), 305–322 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Davier, A. Höcker, B. Malaescu, C. Z. Yuan and Z. Zhang, “Update of the ALEPH non-strange spectral functions from hadronic τ decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) no.3, 2803 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. The measured data of ALEPH Collaboration, with covariance matrix corrections described in Ref. [5], are available on the following web page: http://aleph.web.lal.m2p3.fr/tau/specfun13.html [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Narison and A. Pich, “QCD formulation of the τ decay and determination of Λ(MS),” Phys. Lett. B 211 (1988), 183–188 [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Braaten, “The perturbative QCD collections to the ratio R for τ decay,” Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989), 1458 [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Braaten, S. Narison and A. Pich, “QCD analysis of the τ hadronic width,” Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992), 581–612 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Le Diberder and A. Pich, “Testing QCD with τ decays,” Phys. Lett. B 289 (1992), 165–175 [Google Scholar]
  11. W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, “Electroweak Radiative Corrections to tau Decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988), 1815–1818 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Braaten and C. S. Li, “Electroweak radiative corrections to the semihadronic decay rate of the tau lepton,” Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990), 3888–3891 [Google Scholar]
  13. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. Kühn, “Order a4s QCD Corrections to Z and τ Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008), 012002 [arXiv:080l.l82l [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, S. Peris, M. V. Rodrigues and W. Schaaf, “Strong coupling from an improved τ vector isovector specnal function,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) no.3, 034028 [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Ayala, G. Cvetič and D. Teca, “Borel-Laplace Sum Rules with τ decay data, using OPE with improved anomalous dimensions,” arXiv:2206.0563lv2 [hep-ph], [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Boito, D. Homung and M. Jamin, “Anomalous dimensions of four-quark operators and renormalon structure of mesonic two-point correlators,” JHEP 12 (2015), 090 [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Cvetič, “Renonnalon-motivated evaluation of QCD observables,” Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no. 1, 014028 [Google Scholar]
  18. A. L. Kataev and V. V. Starshenko, “Estimates of the higher order QCD conections to R(s), Rτ and deep inelastic scattering sum rules,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, 235 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Boito, P. Masjuan and F. Oliani, “Higher-order QCD corrections to hadronic τ decays from Padé approximants,” JHEP 1808, 075 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Ayala, G. Cvetič and D. Teca, “Using improved Operator Product Expansion in Borel-Laplace sum rules with ALEPH τ decay data, and determination of pQCD coupling,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) no.4, 362 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Ayala, G. Cvetič and D. Teca, “Determination of perturbative QCD coupling from ALEPH τ decay data using pinched Borel-Laplace and Finite Energy Sum Rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no. 10, 930 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Boito, O. Catà, M. Golterman, M. Jamin, K. Maltman, J. Osborne and S. Peris, “A new determination of as from hadronic τ decays,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011), 113006 [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, S. Peris, private communication; we acknowledge receiving the full covariance matrix of the data (in addition to the data contained in Table I of Ref. [14]). [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, J. Osborne and S. Peris, “Strong coupling from the revised ALEPH data for hadronic τ decays,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) no.3, 034003 [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Pich and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, “Determination of the QCD coupling from ALEPH τ decay data,” Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.3, 034027 [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Pich and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, “Violations of quark-hadron duality in low-energy determinations of αs,” JHEP 07 (2022), 145 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.